The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing Designability via a Generalized Model of Helical Bundle Geometry
Open accessAbstract
Because the space of folded protein structures is highly degenerate, with recurring secondary and tertiary motifs, methods for representing protein structure in terms of collective physically-relevant coordinates are of great interest. By collapsing structural diversity to a handful of parameters, such methods can be used to delineate the space of designable structures, i.e. conformations that can be stabilized with a large number of sequences – a crucial task for de novo protein design. We first demonstrate this on natural α-helical coiled coils using the Crick parameterization. We show that over 95% of known coiled-coil structures are within 1 Å Cα root mean square deviation of a Crick-ideal backbone. Derived parameters show that natural geometric space of coiled coils is highly restricted and can be represented by “allowed” conformations amidst a potential continuum of conformers. Allowed structures have 1) restricted axial offsets between helices, which differ starkly from parallel to anti-parallel structures; 2) preferred superhelical radii, which depend linearly on the oligomerization state; 3) pronounced radius-dependent a and d-position aminoacid propensities and 4) discrete angles of rotation of helices about their axes, which are surprisingly independent of oligomerization state or orientation. In all, we estimate the space of designable coiled-coil structures to be reduced at least 160-fold relative to the space of geometrically feasible structures. To extend the benefits of structural parameterization to other systems, we developed a general mathematical framework for parameterizing arbitrary helical structures, which reduces to the Crick parameterization as a special case. The method is successfully validated on a set of non coiled-coil helical bundles, frequent in channels and transporter proteins, which show significant helix bending but not supercoiling. Programs for coiled-coil parameter fitting and structure generation are provided via a web interface at http://www.gevorggrigoryan.com/cccp/, and code for generalized helical parameterization is available upon request.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences.
Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M., & Stock, J. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 · Cited by 3,953
Crystal structure of an isoleucine-zipper trimer
Harbury, P. B., Kim, P. S., & Alber, T. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371080a0 · Cited by 472
Walshaw, J., & Woolfson, D. N. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4545 · Cited by 357
The Fourier transform of a coiled-coil
Crick, F. H. C. (1953) · Acta Crystallographica · doi:10.1107/s0365110x53001952 · Cited by 313
Cited by
The coming of age of de novo protein design
Huang, P.-S., Boyken, S. E., & Baker, D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19946 · Cited by 1,478
Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model
Ingraham, J. B., Baranov, M., Costello, Z., Barber, K. W., Wang, W., Ismail, A., Frappier, V., Lord, D. M., Ng-Thow-Hing, C., Van Vlack, E. R., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06728-8 · Cited by 444
Self-citationComputational design of water-soluble α-helical barrels
Thomson, A. R., Wood, C. W., Burton, A. J., Bartlett, G. J., Sessions, R. B., Brady, R. L., & Woolfson, D. N. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257452 · Cited by 330
High thermodynamic stability of parametrically designed helical bundles
Huang, P.-S., Oberdorfer, G., Xu, C., Pei, X. Y., Nannenga, B. L., Rogers, J. M., DiMaio, F., Gonen, T., Luisi, B., & Baker, D. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257481 · Cited by 277
Coiled-Coil Design: Updated and Upgraded
Woolfson, D. N. (2017) · Subcellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49674-0_2 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Grigoryan, G., & DeGrado, W. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 405
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1079-1100
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005763580
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing Designability via a Generalized Model of Helical Bundle Geometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.058
- The paper
- Grigoryan, G., & DeGrado, W. F. (2011). Probing Designability via a Generalized Model of Helical Bundle Geometry. Journal of Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.