The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Clustering of Antibody CDR Loop Conformations
Open accessAbstract
Previous analyses of the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of antibodies have focused on a small number of "canonical" conformations for each loop. This is primarily the result of the work of Chothia and coworkers, most recently in 1997. Because of the widespread utility of antibodies, we have revisited the clustering of conformations of the six CDR loops with the much larger amount of structural information currently available. In this work, we were careful to use a high-quality data set by eliminating low-resolution structures and CDRs with high B-factors or high conformational energies. We used a distance function based on directional statistics and an effective clustering algorithm with affinity propagation. With this data set of over 300 nonredundant antibody structures, we were able to cover 28 CDR-length combinations (e.g., L1 length 11, or "L1-11" in our CDR-length nomenclature) for L1, L2, L3, H1, and H2. The Chothia analysis covered only 20 CDR-lengths. Only four of these had more than one conformational cluster, of which two could easily be distinguished by gene source (mouse/human; κ/λ) and one could easily be distinguished purely by the presence and the positions of Pro residues (L3-9). Thus, using the Chothia analysis does not require the complicated set of "structure-determining residues" that is often assumed. Of our 28 CDR-lengths, 15 have multiple conformational clusters, including 10 for which the Chothia analysis had only one canonical class. We have a total of 72 clusters for non-H3 CDRs; approximately 85% of the non-H3 sequences can be assigned to a conformational cluster based on gene source and/or sequence. We found that earlier predictions of "bulged" versus "nonbulged" conformations based on the presence or the absence of anchor residues Arg/Lys94 and Asp101 of H3 have not held up, since all four combinations lead to a majority of conformations that are bulged. Thus, the earlier analyses have been significantly enhanced by the increased data. We believe that the new classification will lead to improved methods for antibody structure prediction and design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Conversely, CDR-H3 loops have high conformational diversity, even in cases where sequence similarity is high [37], and so CDR-H3 modeling is a significantly less constrained, more difficult problem.”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator: Figure 1Preprint
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G. C., Chandonia, J., & Brenner, S. E. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.849004 · Cited by 12,418
Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points
Frey, B. J., & Dueck, D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136800 · Cited by 6,855
Eddy, S. R. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · Cited by 5,515
Biological sequence analysis probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids
Durbin, R. M., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A., & Mitchison, G. (1998) · Cited by 3,565
Sequences of proteins of immunological interest
Kabat, B. E. A. (1984) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(84)90805-4 · Cited by 3,363
PISCES: a protein sequence culling server
Wang, G., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · Cited by 1,664
Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1987) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90412-8 · Cited by 1,406
A NEW GENERATION OF HOMOLOGY SEARCH TOOLS BASED ON PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE
Eddy, S. R. (2009) · International Conference on Genome Informatics (GIW) · doi:10.1142/9781848165632_0019 · Cited by 1,275
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Martin, 1996, Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies, J. Mol. Biol., 263, 800, 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0617 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 382
How B-Cell Receptor Repertoire Sequencing Can Be Enriched with Structural Antibody Data
Kovaltsuk, A., Krawczyk, K., Galson, J. D., Kelly, D. F., Deane, C. M., & Trück, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01753 · Cited by 49
Cryo-electron Microscopy of Adeno-associated Virus
Stagg, S. M., Yoshioka, C., Davulcu, O., & Chapman, M. S. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00936 · Cited by 48
Engineered IgG1‐Fc – one fragment to bind them all
Laurent, E., Traxlmayr, M. W., Obinger, C., & Hasenhindl, C. (2016) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12385 · Cited by 46
Ab-Ligity: identifying sequence-dissimilar antibodies that bind to the same epitope
Wong, W. K., Robinson, S. A., Bujotzek, A., Georges, G. J., Lewis, A. P., Shi, J., Snowden, J., Taddese, B., & Deane, C. M. (2021) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.1873478 · Cited by 46
Weitzner, B. D., & Gray, J. J. (2016) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1601137 · Cited by 45
Mendoza, M. N., Jian, M., King, M. T., & Brooks, C. L. (2020) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3831 · Cited by 46
Predicting antibody complementarity determining region structures without classification
Choi, Y., & Deane, C. M. (2011) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c1mb05223c · Cited by 44
Computational and statistical study on the molecular interaction between antigen and antibody
Osajima, T., Suzuki, M., Neya, S., & Hoshino, T. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.07.005 · Cited by 42
Leveraging SBDD in Protein Therapeutic Development: Antibody Engineering
Gilliland, G. L., Luo, J., Vafa, O., & Almagro, J. C. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-520-6_14 · Cited by 43
Yang, X., Gao, M., Chen, G., Pierce, B. G., Lu, J., Weng, N., & Mariuzza, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.691311 · Cited by 40
Bivalent antibody pliers inhibit β-tryptase by an allosteric mechanism dependent on the IgG hinge
Maun, H. R., Vij, R., Walters, B. T., Morando, A., Jackman, J. K., Wu, P., Estevez, A., Chen, X., Franke, Y., Lipari, M. T., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20143-x · Cited by 40
From Concepts to Inhibitors: A Blueprint for Targeting Protein–Protein Interactions
Hong, S. H., Nguyễn, T. T., Ongkingco, J. F., Nazzaro, A., & Arora, P. S. (2025) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00046 · Cited by 45
Intelligent mining of large-scale bio-data: Bioinformatics applications
Hashemi, F. S. G., Ismail, M. R., Rafii, M. Y., Hashemi, M. S. G., Nadimi-Shahraki, M. H., Rastegari, H., Miah, G., & Aslani, F. (2017) · Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment · doi:10.1080/13102818.2017.1364977 · Cited by 44
Liu, X., Taylor, R. D., Griffin, L., Coker, S.-F., Adams, R., Ceska, T., Shi, J., Lawson, A. D. G., & Baker, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep41306 · Cited by 39
Revisiting antibody modeling assessment for CDR-H3 loop
Nishigami, H., Kamiya, N., & Nakamura, H. (2016) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzw028 · Cited by 39
Murin, C. D., Bruhn, J. F., Bornholdt, Z. A., Copps, J., Stanfield, R. L., & Ward, A. B. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009 · Cited by 38
Kovaltsuk, A., Raybould, M. I. J., Wong, W. K., Marks, C., Kelm, S., Snowden, J., Trück, J., & Deane, C. M. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007636 · Cited by 39
Kelow, S. P., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2020) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2020.1840005 · Cited by 44
Richardson, E., Galson, J. D., Kellam, P., Kelly, D. F., Smith, S. E., Palser, A. L., Watson, S. J., & Deane, C. M. (2021) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2020.1869406 · Cited by 41
Array-Based Rational Design of Short Peptide Probe-Derived from an Anti-TNT Monoclonal Antibody
Okochi, M., Muto, M., Yanai, K., Tanaka, M., Onodera, T., Wang, J., Ueda, H., & Toko, K. (2017) · ACS Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1021/acscombsci.7b00035 · Cited by 37
Mann, A. M., Friedrich, N., Krarup, A., Weber, J., Stiegeler, E., Dreier, B., Pugach, P., Robbiani, M., Riedel, T., Moehle, K., et al. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00152-13 · Cited by 37
Structural basis of VHH-mediated neutralization of the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes
King, M. T., Huh, I., Shenai, A., Brooks, T. M., & Brooks, C. L. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.003888 · Cited by 34
Krokhotin, A., Du, H., Hirabayashi, K., Popov, K. I., Kurokawa, T., Wan, X., Ferrone, S., Dotti, G., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2019) · Molecular Therapy — Oncolytics · doi:10.1016/j.omto.2019.08.008 · Cited by 38
In Silico Methods in Antibody Design
Zhao, J., Nussinov, R., Wu, W., & Ma, B. (2018) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib7030022 · Cited by 37
Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices
Fasnacht, M., Butenhof, K. J., Lamy, A., Hernandez-Guzman, F. G., Huang, H., & Yan, L. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24604 · Cited by 35
Chang, H., Jian, J.-W., Hsu, H.-J., Lee, Y., Chen, H.-S., You, J.-J., Hou, S.-C., Shao, C.-Y., Chen, Y., Chiu, K., et al. (2013) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2013.10.005 · Cited by 35
Schau, I., Michen, S., Hagstotz, A., Janke, A., Schackert, G., Appelhans, D., & Temme, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40032-8 · Cited by 35
In silico prediction of post-translational modifications in therapeutic antibodies
Vatsa, S. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.2023938 · Cited by 35
Dornburg, A., & Yoder, J. A. (2022) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s00251-021-01232-7 · Cited by 35
Lehmann, A., Wixted, J. H. F., Shapovalov, M. V., Röder, H., Dunbrack, R. L., & Robinson, M. K. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1088618 · Cited by 34
Chapman, M. S., Trzynka, A., & Chapman, B. K. (2013) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2013.01.003 · Cited by 37
Ab initio structure prediction of the antibody hypervariable H3 loop
Zhu, K., & Day, T. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24240 · Cited by 34
Antibody CDR loops as ensembles in solution vs. canonical clusters from X-ray structures
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Heiss, M. C., Pomarici, N. D., Math, B. A., & Liedl, K. R. (2020) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2020.1744328 · Cited by 34
Robustification of RosettaAntibody and Rosetta SnugDock
Jeliazkov, J. R., Frick, R., Zhou, J., & Gray, J. J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234282 · Cited by 34
PP2A/B55α substrate recruitment as defined by the retinoblastoma-related protein p107
Fowle, H. A., Zhao, Z., Xu, Q., Wasserman, J. S., Wang, X., Adeyemi, M., Feiser, F., Kurimchak, A., Atar, D., McEwan, B. C., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.63181 · Cited by 31
Downsizing antibodies: Towards complementarity-determining region (CDR)-based peptide mimetics
holsbeeck, K. V., Martins, J. C., & Ballet, S. (2021) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105563 · Cited by 30
Structural repertoire of immunoglobulin λ light chains
Chailyan, A., Marcatili, P., Cirillo, D., & Tramontano, A. L. (2011) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22979 · Cited by 33
Ikeuchi, E., Kuroda, D., Nakakido, M., Murakami, A., & Tsumoto, K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-98977-8 · Cited by 32
SCALOP: sequence-based antibody canonical loop structure annotation
Wong, W. K., Georges, G. J., Ros, F., Kelm, S., Lewis, A. P., Taddese, B., Leem, J., & Deane, C. M. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty877 · Cited by 32
Delineating the RAS Conformational Landscape
Parker, M. I., Meyer, J. E., Golemis, E. A., & Dunbrack (2022) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-0804 · Cited by 30
Peng, H., Hsu, H.-J., Yu, C.-M., Hung, F.-H., Tung, C.-P., Huang, Y.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Tsai, P.-H., & Yang, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-16841-9 · Cited by 31
Structural basis for quinine-dependent antibody binding to platelet integrin αIIbβ3
Zhu, J., Zhu, J., Bougie, D. W., Aster, R. H., & Springer, T. A. (2015) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2015-04-639351 · Cited by 31
Yang, Y. X., Wang, P., & Zhu, B. T. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2022.108364 · Cited by 31
Osinski, T., Pomés, A., Majorek, K. A., Glesner, J., Offermann, L. R., Vailes, L. D., Chapman, M. D., Minor, W., & Chruszcz, M. (2015) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1402199 · Cited by 31
Reconciling the Structural Attributes of Avian Antibodies
Conroy, P. J., Law, R. H. P., Gilgunn, S., Hearty, S., Caradoc-Davies, T. T., Lloyd, G., O’Kennedy, R. J., & Whisstock, J. C. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.562470 · Cited by 30
Immune repertoire mining for rapid affinity optimization of mouse monoclonal antibodies
Hsiao, Y.-C., Shang, Y., DiCara, D. M., Yee, A., Lai, J. J., Kim, S. H., Ellerman, D. A., Corpuz, R. T., Chen, Y., Rajan, S., et al. (2019) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2019.1584517 · Cited by 30
Structure- and sequence-based design of synthetic single-domain antibody libraries
Sevy, A. M., Chen, M., Castor, M. E., Sylvia, T., Krishnamurthy, H., Ishchenko, A., & Hsieh, C.-M. (2020) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzaa028 · Cited by 31
Sangesland, M., & Lingwood, D. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9020125 · Cited by 34
Ensembles in solution as a new paradigm for antibody structure prediction and design
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Georges, G. J., Varga, J. M., & Liedl, K. R. (2021) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.1923122 · Cited by 31
Structural Classification of CDR-H3 in Single-Domain VHH Antibodies
Kuroda, D., & Tsumoto, K. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2609-2_2 · Cited by 27
Grossman, I., Alon, A., Ilani, T., & Fass, D. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.011 · Cited by 29
Hsu, H.-J., Lee, K. H., Jian, J.-W., Chang, H., Yu, C.-M., Lee, Y., Chen, I.-C., Peng, H., Wu, C. Y., Huang, Y., et al. (2013) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2013.10.006 · Cited by 29
Osajima, T., & Hoshino, T. (2016) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2016.08.004 · Cited by 28
Vattekatte, A. M., Shinada, N. K., Narwani, T., Noël, F., Bertrand, O., Meyniel, J.-P., Malpertuy, A., Gelly, J., Cadet, F., & de Brevern, A. G. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.8408 · Cited by 29
Raybould, M. I. J., Marks, C., Kovaltsuk, A., Lewis, A. P., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008781 · Cited by 29
Gupta, S., Nerli, S., Kutti Kandy, S., Mersky, G. L., & Sgourakis, N. G. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42163-z · Cited by 26
Germline-Dependent Antibody Paratope States and Pairing Specific VH-VL Interface Dynamics
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Kroell, K. B., Bacher, L. M., Loeffler, J. R., Quoika, P. K., Georges, G. J., Bujotzek, A., Kettenberger, H., & Liedl, K. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.675655 · Cited by 27
Antibody affinity maturation by computational design
Kuroda, D., & Tsumoto, K. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8648-4_2 · Cited by 26
Sangesland, M., Yousif, A. S., Ronsard, L., Kazer, S. W., Zhu, A. L., Gatter, G. J., Hayward, M. R., Barnes, R. M., Quirindongo-Crespo, M., Rohrer, D., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108065 · Cited by 25
Skamaki, K., Emond, S., Chodorge, M., Andrews, J. L., Rees, D. G., Cannon, D. A., Popovic, B., Buchanan, A. G., Minter, R., & Hollfelder, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002954117 · Cited by 24
Spoendlin, F. C., Abanades, B., Raybould, M. I. J., Wong, W. K., Georges, G., & Deane, C. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1237621 · Cited by 26
Townsend, S., Fennell, B. J., Apgar, J. R., Lambert, M. A., McDonnell, B., Grant, J., Wade, J. M., Franklin, E., Foy, N., Shúilleabháin, D. N., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510944112 · Cited by 26
The therapeutic antibody profiler for computational developability assessment
Raybould, M. I. J., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1450-1_5 · Cited by 25
Computational tools for aiding rational antibody design
Krawczyk, K., Dunbar, J., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6637-0_21 · Cited by 26
Finn, J. A., Leman, J. K., Willis, J. R., Cisneros, A., Crowe, J. E., & Meiler, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154811 · Cited by 25
Marillet, S., Lefranc, M., Boudinot, P., & Cazals, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00034 · Cited by 25
Hanf, K. J. M., Arndt, J. W., Chen, L. L., Jarpe, M. B., Boriack‐Sjodin, P. A., Li, Y., van Vlijmen, H., Pepinsky, R. B., Simon, K. J., & Lugovskoy, A. A. (2013) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.024 · Cited by 24
Reading the repertoire: Progress in adaptive immune receptor analysis using machine learning
O’Donnell, T. J., Kanduri, C., Isacchini, G., Limenitakis, J. P., Brachman, R. A., Alvarez, R. A., Haff, I. H., Sandve, G. K., & Greiff, V. (2024) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.11.006 · Cited by 24
Henriques, P. R., Iacono, L. D., Gimeno, A., Biolchi, A., Romano, M. R., Ardá, A., Bernardes, G. J. L., Jiménez‐Barbero, J., Berti, F., Rappuoli, R., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2011385117 · Cited by 24
Surprisingly Fast Interface and Elbow Angle Dynamics of Antigen-Binding Fragments
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Kroell, K. B., Heiss, M. C., Loeffler, J. R., Quoika, P. K., Waibl, F., Bujotzek, A., Moessner, E., Georges, G. J., & Liedl, K. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.609088 · Cited by 26
Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?
Liu, C. T., Denzler, L., Hood, O. E. C., & Martin, A. C. R. (2024) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2024.2322533 · Cited by 23
Nilvebrant, J., Dunlop, D. C., Sircar, A., Wurch, T., Falkowska, E., Reichert, J. M., Helguera, G. F., Piccione, E. C., Brack, S., & Berger, S. (2012) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.4.2.19495 · Cited by 23
Antibody side chain conformations are position-dependent
Leem, J., Georges, G., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2018) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25453 · Cited by 22
MoFvAb: Modeling the Fv region of antibodies
Bujotzek, A., Fuchs, A., Qu, C., Benz, J., Klostermann, S., Antes, I., & Georges, G. J. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1068492 · Cited by 22
Tight Turns of Outer Membrane Proteins: An Analysis of Sequence, Structure, and Hydrogen Bonding
Franklin, M. W., & Slusky, J. S. G. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.013 · Cited by 22
Transitions of CDR-L3 Loop Canonical Cluster Conformations on the Micro-to-Millisecond Timescale
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Math, B. A., Loeffler, J. R., & Liedl, K. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02652 · Cited by 22
Basak, S. C., Majumdar, S., Nandy, A., Roy, P., Dutta, T., Vračko, M., & Bhattacharjee, A. K. (2019) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph12040157 · Cited by 22
Paratope states in solution improve structure prediction and docking
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Vangone, A., Loeffler, J. R., Seidler, C. A., Georges, G. J., & Liedl, K. R. (2021) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.11.001 · Cited by 25
Engineering Improved Antiphosphotyrosine Antibodies Based on an Immunoconvergent Binding Motif
Mou, Y., Zhou, X. X., Leung, K., Martinko, A. J., Yu, J., Chen, W., & Wells, J. A. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b08402 · Cited by 21
Learned features of antibody-antigen binding affinity
Miller, N. L., Clark, T., Raman, R., & Sasisekharan, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1112738 · Cited by 22
A Novel Cell-Penetrating Antibody Fragment Inhibits the DNA Repair Protein RAD51
Pastushok, L., Fu, Y., Lin, L. S., Luo, Y., DeCoteau, J. F., Lee, K. C. L., & Geyer, C. R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47600-y · Cited by 21
Dynamics of heavy chain junctional length biases in antibody repertoires
Sankar, K., Hoi, K. H., & Hötzel, I. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0931-3 · Cited by 20
The AbDesign computational pipeline for modular backbone assembly and design of binders and enzymes
Lipsh‐Sokolik, R., Listov, D., & Fleishman, S. J. (2020) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3970 · Cited by 20
Antibodies: Computer-Aided Prediction of Structure and Design of Function
Sevy, A. M., & Meiler, J. (2014) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.aid-0024-2014 · Cited by 21
Quast, N. P., Abanades, B., Guloglu, B., Karuppiah, V., Harper, S., Raybould, M. I. J., & Deane, C. M. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07708-6 · Cited by 22
Hallucinating structure-conditioned antibody libraries for target-specific binders
Mahajan, S. P., Ruffolo, J. A., Frick, R., & Gray, J. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.999034 · Cited by 20
Bazzoli, A., Vance, D. J., Rudolph, M. J., Rong, Y., Angalakurthi, S. K., Toth, R. T., Middaugh, C. R., Volkin, D. B., Weis, D. D., Karanicolas, J., et al. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25353 · Cited by 20
Jian, J.-W., Chen, H., Chiu, Y.-K., Peng, H., Tung, C.-P., Chen, I.-C., Yu, C.-M., Tsou, Y.-L., Kuo, W.-Y., Hsu, H.-J., et al. (2018) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2018.1550320 · Cited by 20
Structure of the omalizumab Fab
Jensen, R. K., Plum, M., Tjerrild, L., Jakob, T., Spillner, E., & Andersen, G. R. (2015) · Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications · doi:10.1107/s2053230x15004100 · Cited by 20
Automated Aufbau of antibody structures from given sequences using Macromoltek's SmrtMolAntibody
Berrondo, M., Kaufmann, S., & Berrondo, M. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24595 · Cited by 19
Canonical structures of short CDR‐L3 in antibodies
Teplyakov, A., & Gilliland, G. L. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24559 · Cited by 19
Adaption of human antibody λ and κ light chain architectures to CDR repertoires
van der Kant, R., Bauer, J., Karow‐Zwick, A. R., Kube, S., Garidel, P., Blech, M., Rousseau, F., & Schymkowitz, J. W. H. (2019) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzz012 · Cited by 21
VHH Structural Modelling Approaches: A Critical Review
Vishwakarma, P., Vattekatte, A. M., Shinada, N. K., Diharce, J., Martins, C., Cadet, F., Gardebien, F., Etchebest, C., Nadaradjane, A. A., & de Brevern, A. G. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23073721 · Cited by 19
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Heiss, M. C., & Liedl, K. R. (2019) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzaa004 · Cited by 19
Defining and Studying B Cell Receptor and TCR Interactions
Rappazzo, C. G., Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Mayer, A., Wu, N. C., Greiff, V., & Guthmiller, J. J. (2023) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.2300136 · Cited by 18
Guloglu, B., & Deane, C. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223802 · Cited by 20
Structure and Dynamics Guiding Design of Antibody Therapeutics and Vaccines
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Pomarici, N. D., Fischer, A.-L. M., Hoerschinger, V. J., Kroell, K. B., Riccabona, J. R., Kamenik, A. S., Loeffler, J. R., Ferguson, J. A., Perrett, H. R., et al. (2023) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib12040067 · Cited by 21
Structural basis of the broadly neutralizing anti‐interferon‐α antibody rontalizumab
Maurer, B., Bosanac, I., Shia, S., Kwong, M., Corpuz, R. T., VANDLEN, R. L., Schmidt, K. N., & Eigenbrot, C. W. (2015) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2729 · Cited by 18
Sun, W., Yang, Z.-N., Lin, H., Liu, M., Zhao, C., Hou, X., Hu, Z., & Cui, B. (2019) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2019.02.007 · Cited by 18
The structure of a LAIR1-containing human antibody reveals a novel mechanism of antigen recognition
Hsieh, F.-L., & Higgins, M. K. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27311 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- North, B., Lehmann, A., & Dunbrack, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dunbrack, Roland L.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 406
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-256
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3065967
- OpenAlex
- W1978499958
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (T32CA009035)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM84453, P20 GM76222, P20GM076222, R01GM084453)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- hypervariable region, conformational clustering, circular statistics, affinity propagation, antibody structure prediction, antibody design
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Antibodies, Humans, Immunoglobulin Variable Region, Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains, Markov Chains, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Conformation, Complementarity Determining Regions, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review