Cited by 382Protein Structure and DynamicsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New Clustering of Antibody CDR Loop Conformations

Open access

North, Benjamin, Lehmann, Andreas, Dunbrack, Roland L.·2011·Journal of Molecular Biology

DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030PMC PMC3065967

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Previous analyses of the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of antibodies have focused on a small number of "canonical" conformations for each loop. This is primarily the result of the work of Chothia and coworkers, most recently in 1997. Because of the widespread utility of antibodies, we have revisited the clustering of conformations of the six CDR loops with the much larger amount of structural information currently available. In this work, we were careful to use a high-quality data set by eliminating low-resolution structures and CDRs with high B-factors or high conformational energies. We used a distance function based on directional statistics and an effective clustering algorithm with affinity propagation. With this data set of over 300 nonredundant antibody structures, we were able to cover 28 CDR-length combinations (e.g., L1 length 11, or "L1-11" in our CDR-length nomenclature) for L1, L2, L3, H1, and H2. The Chothia analysis covered only 20 CDR-lengths. Only four of these had more than one conformational cluster, of which two could easily be distinguished by gene source (mouse/human; κ/λ) and one could easily be distinguished purely by the presence and the positions of Pro residues (L3-9). Thus, using the Chothia analysis does not require the complicated set of "structure-determining residues" that is often assumed. Of our 28 CDR-lengths, 15 have multiple conformational clusters, including 10 for which the Chothia analysis had only one canonical class. We have a total of 72 clusters for non-H3 CDRs; approximately 85% of the non-H3 sequences can be assigned to a conformational cluster based on gene source and/or sequence. We found that earlier predictions of "bulged" versus "nonbulged" conformations based on the presence or the absence of anchor residues Arg/Lys94 and Asp101 of H3 have not held up, since all four combinations lead to a majority of conformations that are bulged. Thus, the earlier analyses have been significantly enhanced by the increased data. We believe that the new classification will lead to improved methods for antibody structure prediction and design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator: Figure 1Preprint
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G. C., Chandonia, J., & Brenner, S. E. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.849004 · Cited by 12,418
Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points
Frey, B. J., & Dueck, D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136800 · Cited by 6,855
Profile hidden Markov models
Eddy, S. R. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · Cited by 5,515
Biological sequence analysis probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids
Durbin, R. M., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A., & Mitchison, G. (1998) · Cited by 3,565
Sequences of proteins of immunological interest
Kabat, B. E. A. (1984) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(84)90805-4 · Cited by 3,363
PISCES: a protein sequence culling server
Wang, G., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · Cited by 1,664
Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1987) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90412-8 · Cited by 1,406
A NEW GENERATION OF HOMOLOGY SEARCH TOOLS BASED ON PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE
Eddy, S. R. (2009) · International Conference on Genome Informatics (GIW) · doi:10.1142/9781848165632_0019 · Cited by 1,275

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Martin, 1996, Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies, J. Mol. Biol., 263, 800, 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0617 · DOI

Sorted by citations

Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks
Leman, J. K., Weitzner, B. D., Lewis, S. M., Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Alam, N., Alford, R. F., Aprahamian, M., Baker, D., Barlow, K. A., Barth, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · Cited by 888
SAbDab: the structural antibody database
Dunbar, J., Krawczyk, K., Leem, J., Baker, T., Fuchs, A., Georges, G., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1043 · Cited by 674
Antibody Structure and Function: The Basis for Engineering Therapeutics
Chiu, M. L., Goulet, D. R., Teplyakov, A., & Gilliland, G. L. (2019) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib8040055 · Cited by 711
APCluster: an R package for affinity propagation clustering
Bodenhofer, U., Kothmeier, A., & Hochreiter, S. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr406 · Cited by 479
Defining a new nomenclature for the structures of active and inactive kinases
Modi, V., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1814279116 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling
Raybould, M. I. J., Marks, C., Krawczyk, K., Taddese, B., Nowak, J., Lewis, A. P., Bujotzek, A., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810576116 · Cited by 357
Structural Repertoire of HIV-1-Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the CD4 Supersite in 14 Donors
Zhou, T., Lynch, R. M., Chen, L., Acharya, P., Wu, X., Doria-Rose, N. A., Joyce, M. G., Lingwood, D., Soto, C. S., Bailer, R. T., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.007 · Cited by 311
Modeling and docking of antibody structures with Rosetta
Weitzner, B. D., Jeliazkov, J. R., Lyskov, S., Marze, N. A., Kuroda, D., Frick, R., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Biswas, N., Dunbrack, R. L., & Gray, J. J. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.180 · Cited by 266
ABodyBuilder: automated antibody structure prediction with data-driven accuracy estimation
Leem, J., Dunbar, J., Georges, G., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1205773 · Cited by 238
Antibody structure determination using a combination of homology modeling, energy-based refinement, and loop prediction
Zhu, K., Day, T., Warshaviak, D., Murrett, C. S., Friesner, R., & Pearlman, D. (2014) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24551 · Cited by 206
RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): a general framework for computational antibody design
Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Kalyuzhniy, O., Kubitz, M., Weitzner, B. D., Hu, X., Adachi, Y., Schief, W. R., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112 · Cited by 227
Self-citation
Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends
Norman, R. A., Ambrosetti, F., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Colwell, L. J., Kelm, S., Kumar, S., & Krawczyk, K. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz095 · Cited by 219
“[155], WolfGuy [107] and Aho [43] exist but these are less prevalent.”
Background
Computer-aided antibody design
Kuroda, D., Shirai, H., Jacobson, M. P., & Nakamura, H. (2012) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzs024 · Cited by 225
Comprehensive computational design of ordered peptide macrocycles
Hosseinzadeh, P., Bhardwaj, G., Mulligan, V. K., Shortridge, M. D., Craven, T. W., Pardo‐Ávila, F., Rettie, S., Kim, D. E., Silva, D., Ibrahim, Y., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap7577 · Cited by 222
Antibody structure prediction using interpretable deep learning
Ruffolo, J. A., Sulam, J., & Gray, J. J. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100406 · Cited by 216
Natively glycosylated HIV-1 Env structure reveals new mode for antibody recognition of the CD4-binding site
Gristick, H. B., von Boehmer, L., West, A. P., Schamber, M. R., Gazumyan, A., Golijanin, J., Seaman, M. S., Fätkenheuer, G., Klein, F., Nussenzweig, M. C., et al. (2016) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3291 · Cited by 197
BioPhi: A platform for antibody design, humanization, and humanness evaluation based on natural antibody repertoires and deep learning
Prihoda, D., Maamary, J., Waight, A., Juan, V., Fayadat-Dilman, L., Svozil, D., & Bitton, D. A. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.2020203 · Cited by 190
Structural Basis of Signaling Blockade by Anti-IL-13 Antibody Lebrikizumab
Ultsch, M., Bevers, J., Nakamura, G., Vandlen, R., Kelley, R. F., Wu, L. C., & Eigenbrot, C. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.024 · Cited by 174
Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development
Kim, J., McFee, M., Fang, Q., Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M. (2023) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005 · Cited by 178
Engineering antibody therapeutics
Chiu, M. L., & Gilliland, G. L. (2016) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2016.07.012 · Cited by 175
Phage Display Libraries for Antibody Therapeutic Discovery and Development
Almagro, J. C., Pedraza‐Escalona, M., Arrieta-Oliva, H. I., & Pérez‐Tapia, S. M. (2019) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib8030044 · Cited by 170
Human Non-neutralizing HIV-1 Envelope Monoclonal Antibodies Limit the Number of Founder Viruses during SHIV Mucosal Infection in Rhesus Macaques
Santra, S., Tomaras, G. D., Warrier, R., Nicely, N. I., Liao, H., Pollara, J., Liu, P., Alam, S. M., Zhang, R., Cocklin, S. L., et al. (2015) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005042 · Cited by 164
Specificity, polyspecificity, and heterospecificity of antibody‐antigen recognition
Regenmortel, M. H. V. V. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.2394 · Cited by 151
Antibody recognition of carbohydrate epitopes
Haji‐Ghassemi, O., Blackler, R. J., Young, N. M., & Evans, S. V. (2015) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwv037 · Cited by 150
Association between a common immunoglobulin heavy chain allele and rheumatic heart disease risk in Oceania
Parks, T., Mirabel, M., Kado, J. H., Auckland, K., Nowak, J., Rautanen, A., Mentzer, A. J., Marijon, É., Jouven, X., Perman, M. L., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14946 · Cited by 142
Antibody modeling assessment
Almagro, J. C., Beavers, M. P., Hernandez‐Guzman, F., Maier, J., Shaulsky, J., Butenhof, K., Labute, P., Thorsteinson, N., Kelly, K., Teplyakov, A., et al. (2011) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.23130 · Cited by 131
STCRDab: the structural T-cell receptor database
Leem, J., de Oliveira, S. H. P., Krawczyk, K., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx971 · Cited by 130
An Expanded Benchmark for Antibody-Antigen Docking and Affinity Prediction Reveals Insights into Antibody Recognition Determinants
Guest, J. D., Vreven, T., Zhou, J., Moal, I. H., Jeliazkov, J. R., Gray, J. J., Weng, Z., & Pierce, B. G. (2020) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.01.005 · Cited by 124
PyIgClassify: a database of antibody CDR structural classifications
Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Xu, Q., North, B., Lehmann, A., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1106 · Cited by 120
Sparks of function by de novo protein design
Chu, A. E., Lu, T., & Huang, P. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02133-2 · Cited by 131
TCR3d: The T cell receptor structural repertoire database
Gowthaman, R., & Pierce, B. G. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz517 · Cited by 115
Glycan Shifting on Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) E2 Glycoprotein Is a Mechanism for Escape from Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies
Pantua, H., Diao, J., Ultsch, M. H., Hazen, M., Mathieu, M. A., McCutcheon, K. M., Takeda, K., Date, S. V., Cheung, T. K., Phung, Q. T., et al. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.02.025 · Cited by 113
AbDesign: An algorithm for combinatorial backbone design guided by natural conformations and sequences: Combinatorial Backbone Design in Antibodies
Lapidoth, G. D., Baran, D., Pszolla, G. M., Norn, C., Alon, A., Tyka, M. D., & Fleishman, S. J. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24779 · Cited by 107
Understanding the significance and implications of antibody numbering and antigen-binding surface/residue definition
Dondelinger, M., Filée, P., Sauvage, E., Quinting, B., Muyldermans, S., Galleni, M., & Vandevenne, M. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02278 · Cited by 107
The H3 loop of antibodies shows unique structural characteristics
Regep, C., Georges, G., Shi, J., Popovic, B., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25291 · Cited by 99
The Origin of CDR H3 Structural Diversity
Weitzner, B. D., Dunbrack, R. L., & Gray, J. J. (2015) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.11.010 · Cited by 109
Design, development and characterization of ACT017, a humanized Fab that blocks platelet's glycoprotein VI function without causing bleeding risks
Lebozec, K., Jandrot‐Perrus, M., Avenard, G., Favre‐Bulle, O., & Billiald, P. (2017) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2017.1336592 · Cited by 100
Many Routes to an Antibody Heavy-Chain CDR3: Necessary, Yet Insufficient, for Specific Binding
D’Angelo, S., Ferrara, F., Naranjo, L. A., Erasmus, M. F., Hraber, P., & Bradbury, A. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00395 · Cited by 98
Blind prediction performance of RosettaAntibody 3.0: Grafting, relaxation, kinematic loop modeling, and full CDR optimization
Weitzner, B. D., Kuroda, D., Marze, N. A., Xu, J., & Gray, J. J. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24534 · Cited by 94
The indistinguishability of epitopes from protein surface is explained by the distinct binding preferences of each of the six antigen-binding loops
Kunik, V., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt027 · Cited by 96
Characterizing the Diversity of the CDR-H3 Loop Conformational Ensembles in Relationship to Antibody Binding Properties
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Loeffler, J. R., Kraml, J., Kahler, U., Kamenik, A. S., & Liedl, K. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.03065 · Cited by 98
A flexible docking approach for prediction of T cell receptor–peptide–MHC complexes
Pierce, B. G., & Weng, Z. (2012) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2181 · Cited by 92
Prediction of site-specific interactions in antibody–antigen complexes: the proABC method and server
Olimpieri, P. P., Chailyan, A., Tramontano, A., & Marcatili, P. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt369 · Cited by 90
Camelid Ig V genes reveal significant human homology not seen in therapeutic target genes, providing for a powerful therapeutic antibody platform
Klarenbeek, A., Mazouari, K. E., Desmyter, A., Blanchetot, C., Hultberg, A., Jonge, N. D., Roovers, R. C., Cambillau, C., Spinelli, S., Del‐Favero, J., et al. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1046648 · Cited by 96
Studying the antibody repertoire after vaccination: practical applications
Galson, J. D., Pollard, A. J., Trück, J., & Kelly, D. F. (2014) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2014.04.005 · Cited by 94
Assessment of fully automated antibody homology modeling protocols in molecular operating environment
Maier, J. K. X., & Labute, P. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24576 · Cited by 91
A new clustering and nomenclature for beta turns derived from high-resolution protein structures
Shapovalov, M. V., Vučetić, S., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006844 · Cited by 94
Antigen‐binding site anatomy and somatic mutations in antibodies that recognize different types of antigens
Raghunathan, G., Smart, J., Williams, J. F., & Almagro, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.2158 · Cited by 88
An autoreactive antibody from an SLE/HIV-1 individual broadly neutralizes HIV-1
Bonsignori, M., Wiehe, K. J., Grimm, S. K., Lynch, R. M., Yang, G., Kozink, D. M., Perrin, F., Cooper, A. J., Hwang, K., Chen, X., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci73441 · Cited by 87
LYRA, a webserver for lymphocyte receptor structural modeling
Klausen, M. S., Anderson, M. V., Jespersen, M. C., Nielsen, M., & Marcatili, P. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv535 · Cited by 87
Fundamental Characteristics of the Immunoglobulin VH Repertoire of Chickens in Comparison with Those of Humans, Mice, and Camelids
Wu, L., Oficjalska, K., Lambert, M. A., Fennell, B. J., Darmanin-Sheehan, A., Shúilleabháin, D. N., Autin, B., Cummins, E., Tchistiakova, L., Bloom, L., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1102466 · Cited by 87
The diversity of H 3 loops determines the antigen‐binding tendencies of antibody CDR loops
Tsuchiya, Y., & Mizuguchi, K. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2874 · Cited by 86
Current advances in biopharmaceutical informatics: guidelines, impact and challenges in the computational developability assessment of antibody therapeutics
Khetan, R., Curtis, R., Deane, C. M., Hadsund, J. T., Kar, U., Krawczyk, K., Kuroda, D., Robinson, S. A., Sormanni, P., Tsumoto, K., et al. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2021.2020082 · Cited by 93
Structure of adeno-associated virus-2 in complex with neutralizing monoclonal antibody A20
McCraw, D. M., O’Donnell, J. K., Taylor, K. A., Stagg, S. M., & Chapman, M. S. (2012) · Virology · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2012.05.004 · Cited by 84
Molecular Determinants for Antibody Binding on Group 1 House Dust Mite Allergens
Chruszcz, M., Pomés, A., Glesner, J., Vailes, L. D., Osinski, T., Porebski, P. J., Majorek, K. A., Heymann, P. W., Platts‐Mills, T. A. E., Minor, W., et al. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.311159 · Cited by 84
Antigen–Antibody Complexes
Kapingidza, A. B., Kowal, K., & Chruszcz, M. (2020) · Sub-cellular biochemistry/Subcellular biochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41769-7_19 · Cited by 88
Computational Methods in Immunology and Vaccinology: Design and Development of Antibodies and Immunogens
Guarra, F., & Colombo, G. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00513 · Cited by 82
Antibody humanization by structure-based computational protein design
Choi, Y., Hua, C. K., Sentman, C. L., Ackerman, M. E., & Bailey‐Kellogg, C. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1076600 · Cited by 85
Geometric potentials from deep learning improve prediction of CDR H3 loop structures
Ruffolo, J. A., Guerra, C., Mahajan, S. P., Sulam, J., & Gray, J. J. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa457 · Cited by 74
Natural and man-made V-gene repertoires for antibody discovery
Finlay, W. J. J., & Almagro, J. C. (2012) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2012.00342 · Cited by 82
Comparative Analysis of the CDR Loops of Antigen Receptors
Wong, W. K., Leem, J., & Deane, C. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02454 · Cited by 80
CDR-H3 loop ensemble in solution – conformational selection upon antibody binding
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Kraml, J., Georges, G. J., & Liedl, K. R. (2019) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2019.1618676 · Cited by 77
Antibody informatics for drug discovery
Shirai, H., Prades, C., Vita, R., Marcatili, P., Popovic, B., Xu, J., Overington, J. P., Hirayama, K., Soga, S., Tsunoyama, K., et al. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.07.006 · Cited by 73
Aberrant B cell repertoire selection associated with HIV neutralizing antibody breadth
Roskin, K. M., Jackson, K., Lee, J.-Y., Hoh, R. A., Joshi, S. A., Hwang, K., Bonsignori, M., Pedroza‐Pacheco, I., Liao, H., Moody, M. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0581-0 · Cited by 77
Antibody modeling assessment II. Structures and models
Teplyakov, A., Luo, J., Obmolova, G., Malia, T. J., Sweet, R., Stanfield, R. L., Kodangattil, S., Almagro, J. C., & Gilliland, G. L. (2014) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24554 · Cited by 72
Structural insights into the mechanism of action of a biparatopic anti-HER2 antibody
Oganesyan, V., Li, P., Bee, J. S., Li, J., Perry, S. R., Comer, F. I., XU, L. L., Cook, K. E., Senthil, K., Clarke, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.818013 · Cited by 72
A Review of Deep Learning Methods for Antibodies
Graves, J., Byerly, J., Priego, E., Makkapati, N., Parish, S., Medellin, B. P., & Berrondo, M. (2020) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib9020012 · Cited by 76
Nature-inspired design of motif-specific antibody scaffolds
Koerber, J. T., Thomsen, N. D., Hannigan, B. T., DeGrado, W. F., & Wells, J. A. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2672 · Cited by 71
Overlapping hotspots in CDRs are critical sites for V region diversification
Wei, L., Chahwan, R., Wang, S., Wang, X. H., Pham, P., Goodman, M. F., Bergman, A., Scharff, M. D., & MacCarthy, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1500788112 · Cited by 69
Evaluation of template‐based modeling in CASP13
Croll, T. I., Sammito, M. D., Kryshtafovych, A., & Read, R. J. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25800 · Cited by 69
How repertoire data are changing antibody science
Marks, C., & Deane, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.rev120.010181 · Cited by 69
Conservation and diversity in the ultralong third heavy-chain complementarity-determining region of bovine antibodies
Stanfield, R. L., Wilson, I. A., & Smider, V. V. (2016) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aaf7962 · Cited by 64
Repertoire Analysis of Antibody CDR-H3 Loops Suggests Affinity Maturation Does Not Typically Result in Rigidification
Jeliazkov, J. R., Sljoka, A., Kuroda, D., Tsuchimura, N., Katoh, N., Tsumoto, K., & Gray, J. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00413 · Cited by 68
Bent into shape: Folded peptides to mimic protein structure and modulate protein function
Merritt, H. I., Sawyer, N., & Arora, P. S. (2020) · Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/pep2.24145 · Cited by 65
Expressed antibody repertoires in human cord blood cells: 454 sequencing and IMGT/HighV-QUEST analysis of germline gene usage, junctional diversity, and somatic mutations
Prabakaran, P., Chen, W., Singarayan, M. G., Stewart, C. C., Streaker, E. D., Feng, Y., & Dimitrov, D. S. (2011) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s00251-011-0595-8 · Cited by 63
In silico methods for design of biological therapeutics
Roy, A., Nair, S. A., Sen, N., Soni, N., & Madhusudhan, M. S. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.09.008 · Cited by 62
Structural diversity in a human antibody germline library
Teplyakov, A., Obmolova, G., Malia, T., Luo, J., Muzammil, S., Sweet, R. W., Almagro, J. C., & Gilliland, G. L. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1190060 · Cited by 62
Assessing human B cell repertoire diversity and convergence
Imkeller, K., & Wardemann, H. (2018) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12670 · Cited by 61
Prediction of delayed retention of antibodies in hydrophobic interaction chromatography from sequence using machine learning
Jain, T., Boland, T., Lilov, A., Burnina, I., Brown, M., Xu, Y., & Vásquez, M. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx519 · Cited by 61
PIGSPro: prediction of immunoGlobulin structures v2
Lepore, R., Olimpieri, P. P., Messih, M. A., & Tramontano, A. L. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx334 · Cited by 61
Antibody H3 structure prediction
Marks, C., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2017.01.010 · Cited by 56
Augmenting adaptive immunity: progress and challenges in the quantitative engineering and analysis of adaptive immune receptor repertoires
Brown, A. J., Snapkov, I., Akbar, R., Pavlović, M., Miho, E., Sandve, G. K., & Greiff, V. (2019) · Molecular Systems Design & Engineering · doi:10.1039/c9me00071b · Cited by 59
AbRSA: A robust tool for antibody numbering
Li, L., Chen, S., Miao, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Xiao, Z. J., & Cao, Y. (2019) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3633 · Cited by 62
An Ultra-specific Avian Antibody to Phosphorylated Tau Protein Reveals a Unique Mechanism for Phosphoepitope Recognition
Shih, H. H., Tu, C., Cao, W. J., Klein, A., Ramsey, R., Fennell, B. J., Lambert, M. A., Shúilleabháin, D. N., Autin, B., Kouranova, E., et al. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.415935 · Cited by 59
Trends in therapeutic antibody affinity maturation: From in-vitro towards next-generation sequencing approaches
Tabasinezhad, M., Talebkhan, Y., Wenzel, W., Rahimi, H., Omidinia, E., & Mahboudi, F. (2019) · Immunology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2019.06.009 · Cited by 59
Maturation of the Human Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Repertoire With Age
Ghraichy, M., Galson, J. D., Kovaltsuk, A., von Niederhäusern, V., Schmid, J. P., Recher, M., Jauch, A., Miho, E., Kelly, D. F., Deane, C. M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01734 · Cited by 57
Modeling Immunity with Rosetta: Methods for Antibody and Antigen Design
Schoeder, C. T., Schmitz, S., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Sevy, A. M., Finn, J. A., Sauer, M. F., Bozhanova, N. G., Mueller, B. K., Sangha, A. K., Bonet, J., et al. (2021) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00912 · Cited by 57
Antibody modeling using the Prediction of ImmunoGlobulin Structure (PIGS) web server
Marcatili, P., Olimpieri, P. P., Chailyan, A., & Tramontano, A. L. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.189 · Cited by 60
Structural basis for norovirus neutralization by an HBGA blocking human IgA antibody
Shanker, S., Czakó, R., Sapparapu, G., Alvarado, G. S., Viskovska, M., Sankaran, B., Atmar, R. L., Crowe, J. E., Estes, M. K., & Prasad, B. V. V. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1609990113 · Cited by 59
Antibodies exhibit multiple paratope states influencing VH–VL domain orientations
Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Pomarici, N. D., Math, B. A., Kroell, K. B., Waibl, F., Bujotzek, A., Georges, G. J., & Liedl, K. R. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01319-z · Cited by 59
Prediction of VH-VL domain orientation for antibody variable domain modeling
Bujotzek, A., Dunbar, J., Lipsmeier, F., Schäfer, W., Antes, I., Deane, C. M., & Georges, G. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24756 · Cited by 56
Engineering Stability, Viscosity, and Immunogenicity of Antibodies by Computational Design
Kuroda, D., & Tsumoto, K. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.01.011 · Cited by 59
Combining experimental techniques with molecular dynamics to investigate the impact of different enzymatic hydrolysis of β-lactoglobulin on the antigenicity reduction
Yu, X.-X., Liang, W.-Y., Yin, J., Zhou, Q., Chen, D., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129139 · Cited by 55
Challenges in antibody structure prediction
Fernández-Quintero, M. L., Kokot, J., Waibl, F., Fischer, A.-L. M., Quoika, P. K., Deane, C. M., & Liedl, K. R. (2023) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2023.2175319 · Cited by 55
Improved prediction of antibody VL–VHorientation
Marze, N. A., Lyskov, S., & Gray, J. J. (2016) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzw013 · Cited by 55
Length-independent structural similarities enrich the antibody CDR canonical class model
Nowak, J., BAKER, T. S., Georges, G. J., Kelm, S., Klostermann, S., Shi, J., Sridharan, S., & Deane, C. M. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1158370 · Cited by 59
Antibody Structure
Stanfield, R. L., & Wilson, I. A. (2014) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.aid-0012-2013 · Cited by 54
T-dependent B cell responses to Plasmodium induce antibodies that form a high-avidity multivalent complex with the circumsporozoite protein
Fisher, C. R., Sutton, H. J., Kaczmarski, J. A., McNamara, H. A., Clifton, B. E., Mitchell, J. A., Cai, Y., Dups, J., D'Arcy, N. J., Singh, M., et al. (2017) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006469 · Cited by 53
High-resolution modeling of antibody structures by a combination of bioinformatics, expert knowledge, and molecular simulations
Shirai, H., Ikeda, K., Yamashita, K., Tsuchiya, Y., Sarmiento, J., Liang, S., Morokata, T., Mizuguchi, K., Higo, J., Standley, D. M., et al. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24591 · Cited by 51
Kotai Antibody Builder: automated high-resolution structural modeling of antibodies
Yamashita, K., Ikeda, K., Amada, K. M., Liang, S., Tsuchiya, Y., Nakamura, H., Shirai, H., & Standley, D. M. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu510 · Cited by 48

Authors: North, B., Lehmann, A., & Dunbrack, R. L.
Affiliations: Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author: Dunbrack, Roland L.
ORCID: Lehmann, Andreas
Dunbrack, Roland L.
Venue: Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2011-02
Volume: 406
Issue: 2
Pages: 228-256
ISSN: 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030
PMC: PMC3065967
OpenAlex: W1978499958
Cited by: 380
References: 38
Citations by year: 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI: 4.95
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders: National Cancer Institute (T32CA009035)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM84453, P20 GM76222, P20GM076222, R01GM084453)
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords: hypervariable region, conformational clustering, circular statistics, affinity propagation, antibody structure prediction, antibody design
MeSH terms: Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Antibodies, Humans, Immunoglobulin Variable Region, Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains, Markov Chains, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Conformation, Complementarity Determining Regions, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

A New Clustering of Antibody CDR Loop Conformations

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks