Cited by 26Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsResearch Data Management Practices

ModelCIF: An Extension of PDBx/mmCIF Data Representation for Computed Structure Models

Open access
Vallat, Brinda, Tauriello, Gerardo, Bienert, Stefan, Haas, Juergen, Webb, Benjamin M., Žídek, Augustin, Zheng, Wei, Peisach, Ezra +17 more·2023·Journal of Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ModelCIF (github.com/ihmwg/ModelCIF) is a data information framework developed for and by computational structural biologists to enable delivery of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) data to users worldwide. ModelCIF describes the specific set of attributes and metadata associated with macromolecular structures modeled by solely computational methods and provides an extensible data representation for deposition, archiving, and public dissemination of predicted three-dimensional (3D) models of macromolecules. It is an extension of the Protein Data Bank Exchange / macromolecular Crystallographic Information Framework (PDBx/mmCIF), which is the global data standard for representing experimentally-determined 3D structures of macromolecules and associated metadata. The PDBx/mmCIF framework and its extensions (e.g., ModelCIF) are managed by the Worldwide Protein Data Bank partnership (wwPDB, wwpdb.org) in collaboration with relevant community stakeholders such as the wwPDB ModelCIF Working Group (wwpdb.org/task/modelcif). This semantically rich and extensible data framework for representing computed structure models (CSMs) accelerates the pace of scientific discovery. Herein, we describe the architecture, contents, and governance of ModelCIF, and tools and processes for maintaining and extending the data standard. Community tools and software libraries that support ModelCIF are also described.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168021

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vallat, B., Tauriello, G., Bienert, S., Haas, J., Webb, B. M., Žídek, A., Zheng, W., Peisach, E., Piehl, D. W., Anischanka, I., Sillitoe, I., Tolchard, J., Varadi, M., Baker, D., Orengo, C., Zhang, Y., Hoch, J. C., Kurisu, G., Patwardhan, A., Velankar, S., Burley, S. K., Sali, A., Schwede, T., Berman, H. M., & Westbrook, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Institute for Protein Research, The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
Vallat, Brinda
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
435
Issue
14
Pages
168021
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321483489
Cited by
26
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (22ama121001)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJND2205)
  • US Department of Energy (DE-SC0019749)
  • National Science Foundation (DBI-2112967, DBI-1756250, DBI-1756248, DBI-1832184, DBI-2129634, DBI-2019297, ACI-1548562, DBI-2112966)
  • DeepMind (R01GM109046)
  • Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM133198, R01GM083960, P41GM109824, R01GM109046, DBI-2112967, DBI-1756250)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/W017970/1, BB/S020071/1, BB/V004247/1, BB/S020144/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
FAIR data, data standards, metadata, wwPDB, data governance
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, Software, Databases, Protein, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review