Cited by 218Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsMenstrual Health and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endometriosis and Mechanisms of Pelvic Pain

Howard, Fred M.·2009·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract

Endometriosis remains an enigmatic disorder in that the cause, the natural history, and the precise mechanisms by which it causes pain are not completely understood. The pain symptoms most commonly attributed to endometriosis are dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. Pain may be due to nociceptive, inflammatory, or neuropathic mechanisms, and there is evidence that all 3 of these mechanisms are relevant to endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. It is proposed that the clinically observed inconsistencies of the relationships of endometriosis severity and the presence or severity of pain are likely due to variable roles of different pain mechanisms in endometriosis. A better understanding of the roles of nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain in endometriosis is likely to improve the treatment of women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.017

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 90 references

2 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sampson, 1924, Benign and malignant endometrial implants in the peritoneal cavity and their relationship to certain ovarian tumors, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 38, 287

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–218 of 218

Metadata

Authors
Howard, F. M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Howard, Fred M.
Venue
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
540-550
ISSN
1553-4650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085922363
Cited by
218
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, nociceptive pain, inflammatory pain, neuropathic pain, pain mechanisms, endometriosis severity, pain management
MeSH terms
Animals, Chronic Disease, Disease Models, Animal, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Interleukins, Mast Cells, Nerve Growth Factors, Pelvic Pain, Chemokine CCL2, Tumor Necrosis Factors, Pain, Referred, Referred Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review