Cited by 2,334Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis

Peritoneal endometriosis due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity

Sampson, John A.·1927·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)30003-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most widely accepted theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis is retrograde menstruation through the fallopian tubes into the pelvic cavity.

    “The most widely accepted theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis is retrograde menstruation through the fallopian tubes into the pelvic cavity.”

    From Extra-pelvic endometriosis: a review. (2020) · cites this paper as [4]

  • The implantation theory was a reasonable hypothesis when formulated.

    “The implantation theory (1, 11, 201) was a reasonable hypothesis when formulated, while the metaplasia theory (31) was a histologic observation that did not consider genetic or epigenetic changes.”
  • Arcellana et al. observed in one neonate with the McKusick-Kaufman syndrome not only the presence of tubal regurgitation of menstrual debris, but in addition, for the first time, the serosal implantation of endometrial fragments.

    “Arcellana et al. (31) observed in one neonate with the McKusick-Kaufman syndrome not only the presence of tubal regurgitation of menstrual debris, as also observed by Sampson (6, 7), but in addition, for the first time, the serosal implantation of endometrial fragments.”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Sampson observed tubal reflux of menstrual shedding at the time of menstruation, but never reported the early stage of endometrial attachment to the mesothelium and invasion as documented by Witz et al. in experimental conditions.

    “It is important to note that although Sampson observed tubal reflux of menstrual shedding (7) at the time of menstruation, but never reported the early stage of endometrial attachment to the mesothelium and invasion as documented by Witz et al. (32) in experimental conditions.”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sampson, J. A.
Affiliations
Albany Medical College (US)
Corresponding author
Sampson, John A.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1927
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
422-469
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2203749559
Cited by
2,334
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 74
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Keywords
peritoneal endometriosis, endometrium, peritoneal cavity, endometriosis etiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review