Cited by 24Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Isolated Endometriosis on the Rectus Abdominis Muscle in Women without a History of Abdominal Surgery: a Rare and Intriguing Finding

Granese, Roberta, Cucinella, Gaspare, Barresi, Valeria, Navarra, Giuseppe, Candiani, Massimo, Triolo, Onofrio·2009·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract

We report 2 rare cases of endometriosis on the rectus abdominal muscle diagnosed incidentally during an operation for inguinal hernia repair in women with no surgical history. Two women sought medical attention for a mass found in the pubic abdominal wall. Only 1 woman reported occasional pain. At physical examination in both women, an ovoid swelling in the right pubic area was felt. One woman experienced pain on palpation, and one reported slight discomfort. Ultrasonography demonstrated a heterogeneous hypoechogenic formation with indistinct edges; diagnosis was difficult. Routine clinical and instrumental (pelvic ultrasonography) gynecologic examination in both patients performed shortly before hospitalization had not revealed any macroscopic focus of endometriosis in the pelvic region. At surgery, a lesion consistent with the diagnosis of endometriosis was found, which was confirmed at histologic analysis. These cases could represent the consolidation of different theories of endometriosis diffusion. We suggest including endometriosis in the differential diagnosis of a symptomatic mass in the abdominal wall in women with and without a surgical history.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.08.005

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a substantial minority of cases, abdominal wall endometriosis does not arise in association with abdominal scarring or prior surgery.

    “However, in a substantial minority of cases, AWE does not arise in association with abdominal scarring or in the context of prior surgery (1, 2).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Granese, R., Cucinella, G., Barresi, V., Navarra, G., Candiani, M., & Triolo, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo (IT)
  • Ospedale San Paolo (IT)
Corresponding author
Granese, Roberta
Venue
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
798-801
ISSN
1553-4650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130196013
Cited by
24
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, rectus abdominis, abdominal wall mass, inguinal hernia repair, incidental finding, differential diagnosis, pubic region, ultrasonography
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnostic Errors, Endometriosis, Female, Hernia, Inguinal, Humans, Middle Aged, Ultrasonography, Rectus Abdominis, Incidental Findings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review