The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a result, there is a growing body of literature that argues it is more appropriate to use generalized linear mixed-effects probit/logit models to analyze these types of accuracy data (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Quené and van den Bergh, 2008; Song et al., 2017).”
From Cognitive Mapping Without Vision: Comparing Wayfinding Performance After Learning From Digital Touchscreen-Based Multimodal Maps vs. Embossed Tactile Overlays (2020) · cites this paper as Quené and van den Bergh, 2008
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 · Cited by 11,187
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 · Cited by 8,540
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
Myers, J. L., & Winer, B. J. (1964) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419292 · Cited by 8,111
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bailey, 1982, Confounding, Vol. 2, 128
- Bates, 2005, Fitting linear models in R: Using the lme4 package, R News, 5, 27
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · Cited by 10,328
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010) · International journal of psychological research · doi:10.21500/20112084.807 · Cited by 1,151
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 · Cited by 791
Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English
Bresnan, J. W., & Ford, M. (2010) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.0.0189 · Cited by 622
An Introduction to Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling in R
Brown, V. A. (2021) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920960351 · Cited by 576
Metadata
- Authors
- Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Quené, Hugo
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413-425
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988055263
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiteit Utrecht
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- mixed models, crossed random effects, binomial data, generalized linear mixed models, repeated measures ANOVA, type I error
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
