The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Rescorla, R. A. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,342
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Harris, Z. S. (1954) · WORD · doi:10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 · Cited by 4,807
Cited by
Distributional Models of Word Meaning
Lenci, A. (2018) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125254 · Cited by 447
Multilink: a computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation
DIJKSTRA, T., WAHL, A., BUYTENHUIJS, F., VAN HALEM, N., AL-JIBOURI, Z., DE KORTE, M., & REKKÉ, S. (2019) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000287 · Cited by 379
Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619861372 · Cited by 341
Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance
Beaty, R. E., & Johnson, D. R. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01453-w · Cited by 341
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas
Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., McCormick, S. F., & Keuleers, E. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9 · Cited by 207
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 92
- Pages
- 57-78
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2415973339
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 18.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.001
- The paper
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
