The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ColoSeq Provides Comprehensive Lynch and Polyposis Syndrome Mutational Analysis Using Massively Parallel Sequencing
Open accessAbstract
Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) and adenomatous polyposis syndromes frequently have overlapping clinical features. Current approaches for molecular genetic testing are often stepwise, taking a best-candidate gene approach with testing of additional genes if initial results are negative. We report a comprehensive assay called ColoSeq that detects all classes of mutations in Lynch and polyposis syndrome genes using targeted capture and massively parallel next-generation sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument. In blinded specimens and colon cancer cell lines with defined mutations, ColoSeq correctly identified 28/28 (100%) pathogenic mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM, APC, and MUTYH, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions, and large copy number variants. There was 100% reproducibility of detection mutation between independent runs. The assay correctly identified 222 of 224 heterozygous SNVs (99.4%) in HapMap samples, demonstrating high sensitivity of calling all variants across each captured gene. Average coverage was greater than 320 reads per base pair when the maximum of 96 index samples with barcodes were pooled. In a specificity study of 19 control patients without cancer from different ethnic backgrounds, we did not find any pathogenic mutations but detected two variants of uncertain significance. ColoSeq offers a powerful, cost-effective means of genetic testing for Lynch and polyposis syndromes that eliminates the need for stepwise testing and multiple follow-up clinical visits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.
Adzhubei, I. A., Schmidt, S., Peshkin, L., Ramensky, V. E., Gerasimova, A., Bork, P., Kondrashov, A. S., & Sunyaev, S. R. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · Cited by 13,194
Kumar, P., Henikoff, S., & Ng, P. C. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.86 · Cited by 6,521
A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs
The International HapMap Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06258 · Cited by 4,438
MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations
Schwarz, J. M., Rödelsperger, C., Schuelke, M., & Seelow, D. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0810-575 · Cited by 2,975
Hu, H., Wrogemann, K., Kalscheuer, V., Tzschach, A., Richard, H., Haas, S. A., Menzel, C., Bienek, M., Froyen, G., Raynaud, M., et al. (2009) · The HUGO Journal · doi:10.1007/s11568-010-9137-y · Cited by 49
Cited by
Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Pritchard, C. C., Mateo, J., Walsh, M. F., De Sarkar, N., Abida, W., Beltran, H., Garofalo, A., Gulati, R., Carreira, S., Eeles, R., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1603144 · Cited by 1,680
Self-citationOrganoid Profiling Identifies Common Responders to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer
Tiriac, H., Belleau, P., Engle, D. D., Plenker, D., Deschênes, A., Somerville, T. D. D., Froeling, F. E. M., Burkhart, R. A., Denroche, R. E., Jang, G.-H., et al. (2018) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0349 · Cited by 1,092
Pearlman, R., Frankel, W. L., Swanson, B., Zhao, W., Yilmaz, A., Miller, K., Bacher, J., Bigley, C., Nelsen, L., Goodfellow, P. J., et al. (2017) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5194 · Cited by 707
Self-citationLaDuca, H., Stuenkel, A. J., Dolinsky, J. S., Keiles, S., Tandy, S., Pesaran, T., Chen, E., Gau, C.-L., Palmaer, E., Shoaepour, K., et al. (2014) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2014.40 · Cited by 332
Pritchard, C. C., Salipante, S. J., Koehler, K., Smith, C., Scroggins, S., Wood, B., Wu, D., Lee, M. K., Dintzis, S., Adey, A., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.08.004 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pritchard, C. C., Smith, C., Salipante, S. J., Lee, M. K., Thornton, A. M., Nord, A. S., Gulden, C., Kupfer, S. S., Swisher, E. M., Bennett, R. L., Novetsky, A. P., Jarvik, G. P., Olopade, O. I., Goodfellow, P. J., King, M.-C., Tait, J. F., & Walsh, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-366
- ISSN
- 1525-1578 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032465462
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ColoSeq Provides Comprehensive Lynch and Polyposis Syndrome Mutational Analysis Using Massively Parallel Sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.03.002
- The paper
- Pritchard, C. C., Smith, C., Salipante, S. J., Lee, M. K., Thornton, A. M., Nord, A. S., Gulden, C., Kupfer, S. S., Swisher, E. M., Bennett, R. L., Novetsky, A. P., Jarvik, G. P., Olopade, O. I., Goodfellow, P. J., King, M.-C., Tait, J. F., & Walsh, T. (2012). ColoSeq Provides Comprehensive Lynch and Polyposis Syndrome Mutational Analysis Using Massively Parallel Sequencing. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.03.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.