Cited by 1,092Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCancer Cells and Metastasis

Organoid Profiling Identifies Common Responders to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Tiriac, Hervé, Belleau, Pascal, Engle, Dannielle D., Plenker, Dennis, Deschênes, Astrid, Somerville, Tim D. D., Froeling, Fieke E. M., Burkhart, Richard A. +62 more·2018·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the most lethal common solid malignancy. Systemic therapies are often ineffective, and predictive biomarkers to guide treatment are urgently needed. We generated a pancreatic cancer patient–derived organoid (PDO) library that recapitulates the mutational spectrum and transcriptional subtypes of primary pancreatic cancer. New driver oncogenes were nominated and transcriptomic analyses revealed unique clusters. PDOs exhibited heterogeneous responses to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics and investigational agents. In a case study manner, we found that PDO therapeutic profiles paralleled patient outcomes and that PDOs enabled longitudinal assessment of chemosensitivity and evaluation of synchronous metastases. We derived organoid-based gene expression signatures of chemosensitivity that predicted improved responses for many patients to chemotherapy in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Finally, we nominated alternative treatment strategies for chemorefractory PDOs using targeted agent therapeutic profiling. We propose that combined molecular and therapeutic profiling of PDOs may predict clinical response and enable prospective therapeutic selection. Significance: New approaches to prioritize treatment strategies are urgently needed to improve survival and quality of life for patients with pancreatic cancer. Combined genomic, transcriptomic, and therapeutic profiling of PDOs can identify molecular and functional subtypes of pancreatic cancer, predict therapeutic responses, and facilitate precision medicine for patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov; 8(9); 1112–29. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Collisson, p. 1062. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1047

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0349

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 114 PDO cultures from 101 patients underwent transcriptomic and drug-response profiling.

    “114 PDO cultures from 101 patients were generated127 and subjected to transcriptomic profiling, followed by therapeutic profiling”

    From Human disease models in drug development (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

    The Results section, “Assembling a pancreatic cancer patient-derived organoid library” (page unavailable), reports 114 PDO cultures generated from 101 patients. But “Transcriptomic profiling and subtyping” reports RNA sequencing of 44 PDAC-confirmed PDOs, and “PDO pharmacotyping corresponds with individual patient treatment responses” reports therapeutic profiling of 66. The source does not support the implication that all 114 underwent both types of profiling. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDO treatment outcomes correlated positively with individual patient responses.

    “The treatment outcome of the PDOs positively correlated with individual patient responses”

    From Human disease models in drug development (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

  • Patient-derived tumoroid models show promise in testing drug efficacy and potentially determining a personalized treatment for the patient.

    “patient-derived tumoroid models also show promise in testing drug efficacy and potentially determining a personalized treatment for the patient7–12.”
  • Heterogeneity in treatment responses is being exploited for the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients, with a large ongoing European multicentre clinical trial led by the HIT-Cystic Fibrosis consortium to identify potential responders.

    “This heterogeneity in treatment responses is now being exploited for the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients191, with a large ongoing European multicentre clinical trial study, led by the HIT-Cystic Fibrosis consortium, to identify potential responders214.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [214]

    Citation 214 is attached to the claim about a European multicentre cystic fibrosis trial led by the HIT-Cystic Fibrosis consortium. The Discussion describes identifying chemotherapy responders among pancreatic cancer patients, but searches for the consortium, cystic fibrosis, and the European trial found no passage addressing that trial. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Normal and tumor organoid models have been developed from human and mouse pancreas.

    “Recently, normal and tumor organoid models have been developed from both human and mouse pancreas (82, 83).”

    From KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer (2021) · cites this paper as [83]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiriac, H., Belleau, P., Engle, D. D., Plenker, D., Deschênes, A., Somerville, T. D. D., Froeling, F. E. M., Burkhart, R. A., Denroche, R. E., Jang, G.-H., Miyabayashi, K., Young, C. M., Patel, H., Ma, M., LaComb, J. F., Palmaira, R. L. D., Javed, A. A., Huynh, J. C., Johnson, M., Arora, K., Robine, N., Shah, M., Sanghvi, R., Goetz, A. B., Lowder, C. Y., Martello, L., Driehuis, E., LeComte, N., Askan, G., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A., Clevers, H., Wood, L. D., Hruban, R. H., Thompson, E., Aguirre, A. J., Wolpin, B. M., Sasson, A., Kim, J., Wu, M., Bucobo, J. C., Allen, P., Sejpal, D. V., Nealon, W., Sullivan, J. D., Winter, J. M., Gimotty, P. A., Grem, J. L., DiMaio, D. J., Buscaglia, J. M., Grandgenett, P. M., Brody, J. R., Hollingsworth, M. A., O'Kane, G. M., Notta, F., Kim, E., Crawford, J. M., Devoe, C., Ocean, A., Wolfgang, C. L., Yu, K. H., Li, E., Vakoc, C. R., Hubert, B., Fischer, S. E., Wilson, J. M., Moffitt, R., Knox, J., Krasnitz, A., Gallinger, S., & Tuveson, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • New York Genome Center (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
  • 6Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Hofstra University (US)
  • Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • 3PanCuRx Translational Research Initiative, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Corresponding author
Tuveson, David A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
1112-1129
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2807088563
Cited by
1,092
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 16
FWCI
36.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (5P30CA45508-29, 5P50CA101955-07, P20CA192996-03, 1U10CA180944-04, 5U01CA168409-5, 1R01CA188134-01, 1R01CA190092-04, HHSN26100008)
  • Lustgarten Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, patient-derived organoids, chemotherapy response, chemotherapy response prediction, predictive biomarkers, transcriptomic subtypes, cancer driver genes, gene expression signatures, synchronous metastases, chemotherapy-refractory disease, targeted therapy, precision medicine, adjuvant chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Humans, Organoids, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Regulatory Networks, Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Standard of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review