Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laws of crack motion and phase-field models of fracture

Open access
Hakim, Vincent, Karma, Alain·2009·Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids

Abstract

Recently proposed phase-field models offer self-consistent descriptions of brittle fracture. Here, we analyze these theories in the quasistatic regime of crack propagation. We show how to derive the laws of crack motion either by using solvability conditions in a perturbative treatment for slight departure from the Griffith threshold or by generalizing the Eshelby tensor to phase-field models. The analysis provides a simple physical interpretation of the second component of the classic Eshelby integral in the limit of vanishing crack propagation velocity: it gives the elastic torque on the crack tip that is needed to balance the Herring torque arising from the anisotropic surface energy. This force-balance condition can be interpreted physically based on energetic considerations in the traditional framework of continuum fracture mechanics, in support of its general validity for real systems beyond the scope of phase-field models. The obtained law of crack motion reduces in the quasistatic limit to the principle of local symmetry in isotropic media and to the principle of maximum energy-release-rate for smooth curvilinear cracks in anisotropic media. Analytical predictions of crack paths in anisotropic media are validated by numerical simulations. Interestingly, for kinked cracks in anisotropic media, force-balance gives significantly different predictions from the principle of maximum energy-release-rate and the difference between the two criteria can be numerically tested. Simulations also show that predictions obtained from force-balance hold even if the phase-field dynamics is modified to make the failure process irreversible. Finally, the role of dissipative forces on the process zone scale as well as the extension of the results to motion of planar cracks under pure antiplane shear are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.012

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Hakim, V., & Karma, A.
Venue
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
342-368
ISSN
0022-5096 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034192334
Cited by
405
References
15
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laws of crack motion and phase-field models of fracture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.012
The paper
Hakim, V., & Karma, A. (2009). Laws of crack motion and phase-field models of fracture. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.