CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low Back Pain Prevalence and Related Workplace Psychosocial Risk Factors: A Study Using Data From the 2010 National Health Interview Survey

Open access
Yang, Haiou, Haldeman, Scott, Lu, Ming-Lun, Baker, Dean·2016·Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.07.004PMC PMC5530370
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to estimate prevalence of low back pain, to investigate associations between low back pain and a set of emerging workplace risk factors, and to identify worker groups with an increased vulnerability for low back pain in the United States. METHODS: The data used for this cross-sectional study came from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey, which was designed to collect data on health conditions and related risk factors from the US civilian population. The variance estimation method was used to compute weighted data for prevalence of low back pain. Multivariable logistic regression analyses stratified by sex and age were performed to determine the odds ratios (ORs) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for low back pain. The examined work-related psychosocial risk factors included work-family imbalance, exposure to a hostile work environment, and job insecurity. Work hours, occupation, and other work organizational factors (nonstandard work arrangements and alternative shifts) were also examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported low back pain in the previous 3 months among workers in the United States was 25.7% in 2010. Female or older workers were at increased risk of experiencing low back pain. We found significant associations between low back pain and a set of psychosocial factors, including work-family imbalance (OR 1.27, CI 1.15-1.41), exposure to hostile work (OR 1.39, CI 1.25-1.55), and job insecurity (OR 1.44, CI 1.24-1.67), while controlling for demographic characteristics and other health-related factors. Older workers who had nonstandard work arrangements were more likely to report low back pain. Women who worked 41 to 45 hours per week and younger workers who worked >60 hours per week had an increased risk for low back pain. Workers from several occupation groups, including male health care practitioners, female and younger health care support workers, and female farming, fishing, and forestry workers, had an increased risk of low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study linked low back pain to work-family imbalance, exposure to a hostile work environment, job insecurity, long work hours, and certain occupation groups. These factors should be considered by employers, policymakers, and health care practitioners who are concerned about the impact of low back pain in workers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.07.004

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 118 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Clay, 2015, The changing workplace. Researchers at the “Work, Stress and Health 2015” conference explored ways to improve and sustain employees’ well-being, Monitor Psychol, 46

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 216

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yang, H., Haldeman, S., Lu, M.-L., & Baker, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Haiou
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Publisher
National University of Health Sciences
Published
2016-09
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
459-472
ISSN
0161-4754 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.07.004
PMC
PMC5530370
OpenAlex
W2510274048
Cited by
215
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
low back pain, prevalence, psychosocial risk factors, hostile work environment, job insecurity, non-standard employment, long working hours, occupational risk, sex differences, age differences, healthcare workers, farm workers
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, Prevalence, Low Back Pain, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review