Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyber-physical systems architectures for industrial internet of things applications in Industry 4.0: A literature review

Pivoto, Diego G.S., de Almeida, Luiz F.F., da Rosa Righi, Rodrigo, Rodrigues, Joel J.P.C., Lugli, Alexandre Baratella, Alberti, Antonio M.·2021·Journal of Manufacturing Systems

Abstract

Abstract The industrial scenario is undergoing exponential changes, mainly due to the different technologies that emerge quickly and the ever increasing demand. As a consequence, the number of processing devices and systems in the industries’ architectures is also increasing. Entities connectivity, physical/virtual joint functioning, interactivity, interoperability, self-organization, smart decision making, among other factors are fundamental to foster Industry 4.0 (I4.0) potential. We believe that Cyber Physical System (CPS) and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) will have a major role in the emerging I4.0. In this context, researchers and experts from major factories are exploring these technologies in order to keep up with this digital transformation, developing IIoT systems and CPS architectures capable of connecting network devices from different information and communications technologies (ICT) systems, virtualizing the companies’ assets and integrating them with other manufacturing sectors and companies. This article performs a survey covering the main CPS architecture models available in the industrial environment, emphasizing their key characteristics and technologies, as well as the correlations among them, pointing objectives, advantages and contribution for the IIoT introduction in I4.0. It also provides a literature review covering projects from CPSs and IIoT point-of-view, identifying main technologies employed in current state-of-the-art and how they can meet the I4.0 key features of vertical and horizontal industrial integration. Finally, the article points requirements for current and future challenges, limitations, gaps and necessary changes in the CPS architectures in order to improve and introduce them in the I4.0 scenario.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.11.017

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Cited by

See all 494

Metadata

Authors
Pivoto, D. G. S., de Almeida, L. F. F., da Rosa Righi, R., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Lugli, A. B., & Alberti, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
58
Pages
176-192
ISSN
0278-6125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112314931
Cited by
494
References
94
FWCI
36.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyber-physical systems architectures for industrial internet of things applications in Industry 4.0: A literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.11.017
The paper
Pivoto, D. G. S., de Almeida, L. F. F., da Rosa Righi, R., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Lugli, A. B., & Alberti, A. M. (2021). Cyber-physical systems architectures for industrial internet of things applications in Industry 4.0: A literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.11.017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.