The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Obesity on Gynecologic Cancer Screening: An Integrative Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence indicates lower rates of breast and cervical cancer screening among obese compared to nonobese women. This integrative review examines the association between gynecologic cancer screening and body weight, as well as potential barriers to screening. Methods: A literature search of standard computerized databases was conducted for peer‐reviewed articles published between 1950 and January 2009. Results: Twenty‐three studies met the criteria for review. Of the 17 studies that evaluated rates of cervical cancer screening, 13 found obese women significantly less likely than their nonobese counterparts to have had a recent Papanicolaou test, a trend that was stronger in white women when compared to African American women. Eight of the 15 studies examining routine mammography found an inverse association between increasing body weight and recent screening, although findings generally pertained only to women who were white and/or severely obese. Possible barriers to care included embarrassment and perceived weight stigma in the clinical setting, lack of appropriately sized examination equipment, and poor patient–provider communication. Discussion: Further research is needed to clarify the challenges that obese women face in accessing care and to evaluate strategies such as ensuring the availability of appropriate equipment and supplies, the use of alternative screening methodologies, and more culturally sensitive counseling approaches that may improve screening rates in obese women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010;55:344–356 © 2010 by the American College of Nurse‐Midwives.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Obesity also adversely impacts age-appropriate cancer screening, which can lead to delays in breast, gynecological, and colorectal cancer detection42.”
From Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. Adults
Calle, E. E., Rodriguez, C., Walker-Thurmond, K., & Thun, M. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021423 · Cited by 7,696
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00261.x · DOI
- 10.1097/01.ogx.0000180866.62409.01 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/152.6.514 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009292 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/153.3.284 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-103-6-1034 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.11567 · DOI
- 10.1300/J013v20n02_04 · DOI
- 10.1353/hpu.2010.0582 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803105 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.10681 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10552-007-9019-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.20583 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.21660 · DOI
- 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.531 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1089/152460901300233939 · DOI
- 10.1001/archfami.7.4.381 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80350-7 · DOI
- 10.1001/archfami.3.10.888 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047803 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1018754307718 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-132-9-200005020-00003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30354.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.01.020 · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2000.49 · DOI
- 10.1093/epirev/mxm007 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10549-008-0037-y · DOI
- Coughlin SS, 2004, Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: What are the linkages to chronic disease risk?, Prev Chronic Dis, 1, A04
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.031 · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2005.152 · DOI
- 10.2307/4594704 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.23408 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04450.x · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2003.142 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801745 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00122.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2002.tb00089.x · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2005.49 · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2004.184 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00705.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S1368980007000651 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000441-200604000-00002 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.24.12.2049 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.87.7.1190 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00115.x · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.79.6.721 · DOI
- 10.1006/pmed.2002.1079 · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2000.75 · DOI
- 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.049 · DOI
- 10.1001/archfami.7.4.385 · DOI
- 10.1177/000313480707300605 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1140 · DOI
- 10.2214/ajr.174.5.1741251 · DOI
- 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2935 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00016340601033667 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.021 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity
Phelan, S. M., Burgess, D. J., Yeazel, M. W., Hellerstedt, W. L., Griffin, J. M., & van Ryn, M. (2015) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12266 · Cited by 1,361
Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity
Rubino, F., Puhl, R. M., Cummings, D. E., Eckel, R. H., Ryan, D. H., Mechanick, J. I., Nadglowski, J., Ramos Salas, X., Schauer, P. R., Twenefour, D., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0803-x · Cited by 1,152
“Obesity also adversely impacts age-appropriate cancer screening, which can lead to delays in breast, gynecological, and colorectal cancer detection 42 .”
BackgroundWeight bias and health care utilization: A scoping review
Alberga, A. S., Edache, I. Y., Forhan, M., & Russell-Mayhew, S. (2019) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423619000227 · Cited by 348
Obesity in South and Southeast Asia—A new consensus on care and management
Tham, K. W., Abdul Ghani, R., Cua, S. C., Deerochanawong, C., Fojas, M., Hocking, S., Lee, J., Nam, T. Q., Pathan, F., Saboo, B., et al. (2023) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13520 · Cited by 187
Alberga, A. S., Russell-Mayhew, S., von Ranson, K. M., & McLaren, L. (2016) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-016-0112-4 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Aldrich, T., & Hackley, B.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aldrich, Tess
- ORCID
- Hackley, Barbara
- Venue
- Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 344-356
- ISSN
- 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2011
- OpenAlex
- W1977197407
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
- Keywords
- obesity, gynecologic cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, breast cancer screening, mammography, Pap smear, barriers to screening, weight stigma, patient-provider communication, health care access, racial disparities, African American women, white women, body weight
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Vaginal Smears, White People, Young Adult, Papanicolaou Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review