Cited by 133Cancer Risks and FactorsWomen's cancer prevention and managementObesity and Health Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Obesity on Gynecologic Cancer Screening: An Integrative Literature Review

Aldrich, Tess, Hackley, Barbara·2010·Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence indicates lower rates of breast and cervical cancer screening among obese compared to nonobese women. This integrative review examines the association between gynecologic cancer screening and body weight, as well as potential barriers to screening. Methods: A literature search of standard computerized databases was conducted for peer‐reviewed articles published between 1950 and January 2009. Results: Twenty‐three studies met the criteria for review. Of the 17 studies that evaluated rates of cervical cancer screening, 13 found obese women significantly less likely than their nonobese counterparts to have had a recent Papanicolaou test, a trend that was stronger in white women when compared to African American women. Eight of the 15 studies examining routine mammography found an inverse association between increasing body weight and recent screening, although findings generally pertained only to women who were white and/or severely obese. Possible barriers to care included embarrassment and perceived weight stigma in the clinical setting, lack of appropriately sized examination equipment, and poor patient–provider communication. Discussion: Further research is needed to clarify the challenges that obese women face in accessing care and to evaluate strategies such as ensuring the availability of appropriate equipment and supplies, the use of alternative screening methodologies, and more culturally sensitive counseling approaches that may improve screening rates in obese women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010;55:344–356 © 2010 by the American College of Nurse‐Midwives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.10.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00261.x · DOI
  4. 10.1097/01.ogx.0000180866.62409.01 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/aje/152.6.514 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009292 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/aje/153.3.284 · DOI
  8. 10.7326/0003-4819-103-6-1034 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/cncr.11567 · DOI
  10. 10.1300/J013v20n02_04 · DOI
  11. 10.1353/hpu.2010.0582 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803105 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/cncr.10681 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s10552-007-9019-3 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/cncr.20583 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/cncr.21660 · DOI
  17. 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.531 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.004 · DOI
  19. 10.1089/152460901300233939 · DOI
  20. 10.1001/archfami.7.4.381 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80350-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1001/archfami.3.10.888 · DOI
  23. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047803 · DOI
  24. 10.1023/A:1018754307718 · DOI
  25. 10.7326/0003-4819-132-9-200005020-00003 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30354.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.01.020 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/oby.2000.49 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/epirev/mxm007 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s10549-008-0037-y · DOI
  31. Coughlin SS, 2004, Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: What are the linkages to chronic disease risk?, Prev Chronic Dis, 1, A04
  32. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.031 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/oby.2005.152 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/4594704 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/cncr.23408 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04450.x · DOI
  37. 10.1038/oby.2003.142 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801745 · DOI
  39. 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00122.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2002.tb00089.x · DOI
  41. 10.1038/oby.2005.49 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/oby.2004.184 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00705.x · DOI
  44. 10.1017/S1368980007000651 · DOI
  45. 10.1097/00000441-200604000-00002 · DOI
  46. 10.2337/diacare.24.12.2049 · DOI
  47. 10.2105/AJPH.87.7.1190 · DOI
  48. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00115.x · DOI
  49. 10.2105/AJPH.79.6.721 · DOI
  50. 10.1006/pmed.2002.1079 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/oby.2000.75 · DOI
  52. 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.049 · DOI
  53. 10.1001/archfami.7.4.385 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/000313480707300605 · DOI
  55. 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1140 · DOI
  56. 10.2214/ajr.174.5.1741251 · DOI
  57. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2935 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1080/00016340601033667 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.021 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Metadata

Authors
Aldrich, T., & Hackley, B.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Aldrich, Tess
Venue
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-08
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
344-356
ISSN
  • 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-2011
OpenAlex
W1977197407
Cited by
133
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity, gynecologic cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, breast cancer screening, mammography, Pap smear, barriers to screening, weight stigma, patient-provider communication, health care access, racial disparities, African American women, white women, body weight
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Vaginal Smears, White People, Young Adult, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review