Cited by 623Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias

Puhl, R. M., Brownell, K. D.·2003·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Widespread bias and discrimination based on weight have been documented in key areas of living, including education, employment, and health care. This paper examines the social and psychological origins of this bias through a review and critique of theoretical and empirical literatures, and proposes how the field might best advance in the area of reducing stigma. Explanations for the development and reduction of weight stigma are examined with different theoretical ap‐proaches, including attribution theory and a social consensus model. Individual and sociocultural contributors to bias suggested by these approaches are highlighted. New directions are discussed in both the understanding and prevention of weight bias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2003.00122.x

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Puhl, R. M.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
213-227
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2161582645
Cited by
623
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 35
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
weight stigma, weight bias, attribution theory, weight discrimination, stigma reduction, sociocultural factors
MeSH terms
Body Image, Body Weight, Delivery of Health Care, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Prejudice, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review