Cited by 176Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Testing Theories of Dietary Behavior Change in Youth Using the Mediating Variable Model with Intervention Programs

Cerin, Ester, Barnett, Anthony, Baranowski, Tom·2009·Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Abstract

Objective To review and critique current experimentally-based evidence of theoretical mechanisms of dietary behavior change in youth and provide recommendations on ways to enhance theory evaluation. Methods Interventions that examined mediators of dietary behavior change in youth (age 5-18 years) were identified via electronic database searches and reference scanning. Selected studies were reviewed for quality and content and findings were tabulated. Results Seven published interventions were found. All were school-based but differed substantially in dietary outcome, target population, measures, methods of mediation analyses, and theoretical framework. Interventions were relatively unsuccessful in changing mediators. Self-efficacy and outcome expectations were the mechanisms most consistently associated with dietary behavior change. However, only outcome expectancies were identified as mediators in multiple interventions. Conclusions and implications Few interventions have assessed the validity of theoretical mechanisms of dietary behavior change in youth. The variability in the design and target populations across studies makes it impossible to draw conclusions regarding the validity of theories and mediators of dietary behavior change in youth. Future intervention trials need to focus on the identification of effective procedures for mediator change and adopt a more rigorous and systematic approach to theory testing. This is likely to result in more effective interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneb.2009.03.129

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cerin, E., Barnett, A., & Baranowski, T.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
309-318
ISSN
1499-4046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106714104
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
dietary behavior change, youth, school-based intervention, mediation analysis, theory testing, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, theoretical mechanisms, nutrition education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review