Cited by 98Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

Comparison of the brain penetration injury associated with microdialysis and voltammetry

Open access
Jaquins-Gerstl, Andrea, Michael, Adrian C.·2009·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that differences between microdialysis- and voltammetry-based estimates of extracellular dopamine in the brain might originate in the different penetration injury associated with each technique. To address this issue in a direct fashion, microdialysis probes and voltammetric microelectrodes were implanted in the rat striatum for 1, 4, or 24 h. Tissues were perfused with a suspension of fluorescently labeled nanobeads to assess blood vessels near the implant. Tissue sections (30 microm) were labeled with antibodies for PECAM, an endothelial cell marker, or GFAP, a glial marker. In non-implanted control tissue, blood vessels were reliably double-labeled with nanobeads and antiPECAM. Tissue near microdialysis probe tracks exhibited ischemia in the form of PECAM immunoreactive blood vessels devoid of nanobeads. Ischemia was most apparent after the 4-h implants. Probe tracks were surrounded by endothelial cell debris, which appeared as a diffuse halo of PECAM immunoreactivity. The halo intensity decreased with implant duration, indicative of an active wound-healing process. Consistent with this, after 24-h implants, the probe tracks were surrounded by hyperplasic and hypertrophic glia and glial processes were extending towards, and engulfing, the track. Carbon fiber microelectrodes produced a diffuse disruption of nanobead labeling but no focal disruption of blood vessels, no PECAM immunoreactive halo, and no glial activation. These findings illuminate the differences between the extent and nature of the penetration injuries associated with microdialysis and voltammetry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.06.023

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implant's size and volume directly correlate with the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic injuries.

    “The implant’s size and volume directly correlate with the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic injuries (Rosidi et al., 2011), with larger implants exerting more pressure, potentially leading to vascular compression and secondary injuries (Jaquins-Gerstl and Michael, 2009; Kozai et al., 2012).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Jaquins-Gerstl and Michael, 2009

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says penetration-injury severity and extent are related to penetrator size. The Discussion reports ischemic disruption around microdialysis probes but not comparable focal disruption around carbon-fiber microelectrodes. The paper does not establish the cited clause’s proposed mechanism—that larger implants exert more pressure and compress vessels. The hemorrhage-risk clause is cited to Rosidi et al., not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Solutions for balancing power delivery and data transmission can result in compromises such as trade-offs between implant size and power capacity or between energy efficiency and data rate.

    “However, these solutions can sometimes result in compromises, such as trade-offs between the size of the implant and its power capacity or between the energy efficiency and the data rate (Santiago and Westerink, 1990; Deboer and Abercrombie, 1996; Jaquins-Gerstl and Michael, 2009; Kozai et al., 2012).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Jaquins-Gerstl and Michael, 2009

    The Introduction discusses how probe size relates to brain penetration injury, and the Discussion addresses changes in tissue after implantation. Neither addresses trade-offs between implant size and power capacity or between energy efficiency and data rate; searches for power delivery and data transmission found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The inter-relationship between power transfer and data communication in neural implants introduces additional difficulty.

    “Furthermore, the inter-relationship between power transfer and data communication in these implants introduces additional layers of difficulty.”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Jaquins-Gerstl and Michael, 2009

    The Discussion (page unavailable) compares tissue injury from microdialysis probes and carbon-fiber microelectrodes; the Voltammetry Procedures section (page unavailable) describes electrode operation. Neither addresses an inter-relationship between power transfer and data communication in neural implants. Searches for those terms and for wireless power, telemetry, and transmission found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Benveniste H Diemer NH Cellular reactions to implantation of a microdialysis tube in the rat hippocampus Acta Neuropathologica 1987 74 234 38 3673515
  2. Benveniste H Drejer J Schousboe A Diemer NH Regional cerebral glucose phosphorylation and blood flow after insertion of a microdialysis fiber through the dorsal hippocampus in the rat J Neurochem 1987 49 729 34 3612121
  3. Bignami A Dahl D Reuger DC Federoff S Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in normal neural cells and in pathological conditions Advances in cellular neurobiology Orlando Academic Press 1980 285 310
  4. Borland LM Michael AC Voltammetric study of the control of striatal dopamine release by glutamate J Neurochem 2004 91 220 9 15379902
  5. Borland LM Shi G Yang H Michael AC Voltammetric study of extracellular dopamine near microdialysis probes acutely implanted in the striatum of the anesthetized rat J Neurosci Methods 2005 146 149 58 15975664
  6. Bungay PM Newton-Vinson P Isele W Garris PA Justice JB Jr Microdialysis of dopamine interpreted with quantitative model incorporation probe implantation trauma J Neurochem 2003 86 932 46 12887691 PMC2386091
  7. Clapp-Lilly KL Roberts RC Duffy LK Irons KP Hu Y Drew KL An ultrastructural analysis of tissue surrounding a microdialysis probe J Neurosci Methods 1999 90 129 42 10513596
  8. Cookson MR The biochemistry of Parkinson’s disease Ann Rev Biochem 2005 74 29 52 15952880
  9. Cragg SJ Rice ME Greenfield SJ Heterogeneity of electrically evoked dopamine release and reuptake in substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, and striatum J Neurophysiol 1997 77 862 73 9065855
  10. Cropley VL Fujita M Innis RB Nathan PJ Molecular imaging of the dopaminergic system and its association with human cognition Biol Psychiatry 2006 59 898 907 16682268
  11. David DJ Zahniser NR Hoffer BJ Gerhardt GA In vivo electrochemical studies of dopamine clearance in subregions of rat nucleus accumbens: differential properties of the core and shell Exp Neurology 1998 153 277 86 9784287
  12. DeBoer P Abercrombie ED Physiological release of striatal acetylcholine in vivo: modulation by D1 and D2 dopamine receptor subtypes J Pharm Exp Ther 1996 277 775 83 8627558
  13. Dickinson SD Sabeti J Larson GA Giardina K Rubinstein M Kelley MA Grandy DK Low MJ Gerhardt GA Zahniser NR Dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice exhibit decreased dopamine transporter function but no changes in dopamine release in dorsal striatum J Neurochem 1999 72 148 56 9886065
  14. DiChiara G Tanda G Carboni E Estimation of in-vivo neurotransmitter release by brain microdialysis: the issue of validity Behav Pharmacol 1996 7 640 57 11224460
  15. Dyskstra KH Hsiao JK Morrison PF Bungay PM Mefford IN Scully MM Dedrick RL Quantitative examination of tissue concentration profiles associated with microdialysis J Neurochem 1992 58 931 40 1738000
  16. Eng LF DeArmond SJ Federoff S Immunohistochemical studies of astrocytes in normal development and disease Advances in cellular neurobiology Academic Press Orlando 1982 145 71
  17. Garris PA Christensen JRC Rebec GV Wightman RM Real-time measurement of electrically evoked extracellular dopamine in the striatum of freely moving rats J Neurochem 1997 68 152 61 8978721
  18. Garris PA Ciolkowski EL Wightman RM Heterogeneity of evoked dopamine overflow within the striatal and striatoamygdaloid regions Neurosci 1994 59 417 27 8008199
  19. Garris PA Kilpatrick M Bunin MA Michael D Walker QD Wightman RM Dissociation of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens from intracranial self-stimulation Nature 1999 398 67 9 10078530
  20. Gonon F Prolonged and extrasynaptic excitatory action of dopamine mediated by D1 receptors in the rat striatum in vivo J Neurosci 1997 17 5972 78 9221793 PMC6573191
  21. Groothius DR Ward S Schlageter KE Itskovish AC Schwerin SC Allen CV Dills C Levy RM Changes in blood-brain barrier permeability associated with insertion of brain cannulas and microdialysis probes Brain Res 1998 803 218 30 9729397
  22. Groto Y Otani S Grace AA The Yin and Yang of dopamine release: a new perspective Neuropharm 2007 53 583 7 PMC2078202 17709119
  23. Holson RR Bowyer JF Clausing P Gough B Methamphetamine-stimulated striatal dopamine release declines rapidly over time following microdialysis probe insertion Brain Res 1996 739 301 7 8955951
  24. Jones SR Gainetdinov RR Caron MG Application of microdialysis and voltammetry to assess dopamine functions in genetically altered mice: correlation with locomotor activity Psychopharm 1999 147 30 2 10591864
  25. Jones SR Gainetdinov RR Jaber M Giros B Wightman RM Caron MG Profound neuronal plasticity in response to inactivation of the dopamine transporter Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998 95 4029 34 9520487 PMC19957
  26. Kadota E Nonaka K Karasuno M Nishi K Nakamura Y Namikawa K Okazaki YY Teramura K Hashimoto S Experimental quantitative evaluation of transvascular removal of unnecessary substances in brain edema fluid Acta Neurochir Suppl 1994 Suppl 60 162 4 7976534
  27. Kawagoe KT Zimmerman JB Wightman RM Principles of voltammetry and microelectrode surface states J Neurosci Methods 1993 48 225 40 8412305
  28. Kulagina NV Zigmond MJ Michael AC Glutamate regulates the spontaneous and evoked release of dopamine in the rat striatum Neuroscience 2001 102 121 8 11226675
  29. Lu Y Peters JL Michael AC Direct comparison of the response of voltammetry and microdialysis to electrically evoked release of striatal dopamine J Neurochem 1998 70 584 93 9453552
  30. Major O Shdanova T Duffek L Nagy Z Continuous monitoring of blood-brain barrier opening to 51Cr-EDTA by microdialysis after probe injury Acta Neurochir Suppl 1990 51 46 8 2128582
  31. Mitala CM Wang Y Borland LM Jung M Shand S Watkins S Weber SG Michael AC Impact of microdialysis probes on vasculature and dopamine in the rat striatum: A combined fluorescence and voltammetry study J Neurosci Methods 2008 174 177 85 18674561 PMC2713687
  32. Morgan ME Singhal D Anderson BD Quantitative assessment of blood-brain barrier damage during microdialysis J Pharm Exp Ther 1996 277 1167 76 8627529
  33. Ogura T Ogata M Akita H Jitsuki S Akiba L Noda K Hoka S Saji M Impaired acquisition of skilled behavior in rotarod task by moderate depletion of striatal dopamine in a pre-symptomatic stage model of Parkinson’s disease Neurosci Res 2005 51 299 308 15710494
  34. Pellegrino LJ Pellegrino AS Cushman AJ A stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain 2 New York Plenum Press 1979
  35. Peters JL Michael AC Modeling voltammetry and microdialysis of striatal extracellular dopamine: the impact of dopamine uptake on extraction and recovery ratios J Neurochem 1998 70 594 603 9453553
  36. Peters JL Michael AC Changes in the kinetics of dopamine release and uptake have differential effects on the spatial distribution of extracellular dopamine concentration in the rat striatum J Neurochem 2000 74 1563 73 10737613
  37. Peters JL Miner LH Michael AC Sesack SR Ultrastructure at carbon fiber microelectrode implantation sites after acute voltammetric measurements in the striatum of anesthetized rats J Neurosci Methods 2004 137 9 23 15196823
  38. Qian J Wu Y Yang H Michael AC An integrated decoupler for capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection: application to analysis of brain microdialysate Anal Chem 1999 71 4486 92 10546530
  39. Rebec GV Langley PE Pierce CR Wang Z Heidenrich BA A simple micromanipulator for mulipe uses in freely moving rats: electrophysiology, voltammtery and simultaneous intracerebral infusions J Neurosci Methods 1993 47 53 9 8321014
  40. Salgado-Pineda P Delaveau P Blin O Nieoullon A Dopaminergic contribution to the regulation of emotional perception Clinical Neuropharm 2005 28 228 37 16239763
  41. Schiffer WK Mirrione MM Biegon A Alexoff DL Patel V Dewey SL Serial microPET measures of the metabolic reaction to microdialysis probe implants J Neurosci Methods 2006 115 272 84 16519945
  42. Shain W Spataro L Dilgen J Haverstick K Retterer S Isaacson M Saltsman M Turner JN Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003 11 186 8 12899270
  43. Smith AD Justice JB The effect of inhibition of synthesis, release, metabolism and uptake on the microdialysis extraction fraction of dopamine J Neurosci Methods 1994 54 75 82 7815821
  44. Szarowski DH Anderson MD Retterer S Spence AJ Isaacson M Craighead HG Turner JN Shain W Brain responses to mico-machined silicon devices Brain Res 2003 983 23 35 12914963
  45. Timmerman W Westerink BHC Brian microdialysis of GABA and glutamate: what does it signify? Synapse 1997 27 242 61 9329159
  46. Turner JN Shain W Szarowski DN Andersen M Martins S Isaacson M Craighead HG Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants Exp Neurol 1999 156 33 49 10192775
  47. Wagner AK Sokoloski JE Ren D Chen X Khan AS Zafonte RD Michael AC Dixon CE Controlled cortical impact injury affects dopaminergic transmission in the rat striatum J Neurochem 2005 95 457 65 16190869
  48. Warden DL Gordon B McAllister TW Silver JM Barth JT Bruns J Drake A Gentry T Katz DI Kraus J Labbate LA Ryan LM Sparling MB Walters B Whyte J Zapata A Zitnay G Guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury J Neurotrauma 2006 23 1468 1501 17020483
  49. Westerink BHC deVries JB Characterization of in vivo dopamine release as determined by brain microdialysis after acute and subchronic implantations: methodological aspects J Neurochem 1988 51 683 7 3411321
  50. Westerink BHC Tuntler J Damsma G Rollema H de Vries JB The use of tetrodotoxin for the characterization of drug-enhanced dopamine release in conscious rats studied by brain dialysis Naunyn-Schemiederg’s Arch Pharmacol 1987 336 502 7 3501841
  51. Wightman RM Heien MLAV Wassum KM Sombers LA Aragona BJ Khan AS Ariansen JL Cheer JL Phillips PE Carelli RM Dopamine release is heterogeneous within microenvironments of the rat nucleus accumbens Eur J Neurosci 2007 26 2046 54 17868375
  52. Williams GV Castner SA Under the curve: critical issues for elucidating D1 receptor function in working memory Neurosci 2006 139 263 76 16310964
  53. Yang H Michael AC Michael AC Borland LM In vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry of dopamine near microdialysis probes Electrochemical methods for neuroscience CRC Press Boca Raton, FL 2007 489 501 21204386
  54. Yang H Peters JL Michael AC Coupled effects of mass transfer and uptake kinetics on in vivo microdialysis of dopamine J Neurochem 1998 71 684 92 9681459
  55. Zhou F Shu X Castellani RJ Stimmelmayr R Perry G Smith MA Drew KL Hibernation, a model of neuroprotection Am J Pathol 2001 158 2145 51 11395392 PMC1891987

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaquins-Gerstl, A., & Michael, A. C.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Michael, Adrian C.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
183
Issue
2
Pages
127-135
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033922262
Cited by
98
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (#MH075989, R01MH075989)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
microdialysis, voltammetry, carbon fiber microelectrodes, extracellular dopamine, striatum, PECAM, glial activation, wound healing, implant duration
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Blood Vessels, Brain Injuries, Corpus Striatum, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Male, Medial Forebrain Bundle, Time Factors, Wounds, Penetrating, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Microdialysis, Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1, Rats, Electrochemical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review