Cited by 58Neonatal skin health carePressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Frequency, location and risk factors of neonatal skin injuries from mechanical forces of pressure, friction, shear and stripping: A systematic literature review

August, Deanne L., New, Karen, Ray, Robin A., Kandasamy, Yogavijayan·2018·Journal of Neonatal Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnn.2017.08.003

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
August, D. L., New, K., Ray, R. A., & Kandasamy, Y.
Affiliations
  • Townsville Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Corresponding author
August, Deanne L.
Venue
Journal of Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
173-180
ISSN
1355-1841 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2762765924
Cited by
58
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Neonatal skin health care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
neonatal skin injury, pressure ulcers, friction injuries, shear injury, mechanical forces, risk factors, prevalence, gestational age, birth weight, medical devices, neonatal intensive care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review