Cited by 7Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A review of effects of death anxiety on the human brain

Hiyoshi, K., Becker, C., Oishi, N., Fukuyama, H.·2017·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2017.08.732

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hiyoshi, K., Becker, C., Oishi, N., & Fukuyama, H.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hiyoshi, K.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
381
Pages
257
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2773934294
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
fear of death, terror management theory, existential anxiety, self-esteem, cultural worldview, neural correlates, neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review