Cited by 185Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time to diagnosis and factors affecting diagnostic delay in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Open access
Richards, Danielle, Morren, John A., Pioro, Erik P.·2020·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive, degenerative neuromuscular disease with limited treatment options. The diagnosis of ALS can be challenging for numerous reasons, resulting in delays that may compromise optimal management and enrollment into clinical trials. Several studies have examined the process and challenges regarding the clinical diagnosis of ALS. Twenty-one studies that were almost exclusively from the English literature published between 1990 and 2020 were identified via PubMed using relevant search terms and included patient populations from the United States, Canada, Japan, Egypt, and several countries in South America and Europe. Probable or definitive ALS patients were identified using El Escorial or revised El Escorial/Airlie House Criteria. Time to diagnosis or diagnostic delay was defined as mean or median time from patient-reported first symptom onset to formal diagnosis by a physician, as recorded in medical records. The typical time to diagnosis was 10-16 months from symptom onset. Several points of delay in the diagnosis course were identified, including specialist referrals and misdiagnoses, often resulting in unnecessary procedures and surgeries. Bulbar onset was noted to significantly reduce time to ALS diagnosis. Future interventions and potential research opportunities were reviewed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117054

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnostic delay for ALS is shorter compared with other neurodegenerative syndromes.

    “However, diagnostic delay for ALS is shorter compared with other neurodegenerative syndromes.31”

    From Head trauma and environment progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: long-term data from the National ALS Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    Section 5 reports that most studies found an ALS diagnostic delay of 10–16 months. Section 3 discusses delayed dementia diagnosis, but gives no comparable duration or finding that ALS is diagnosed sooner than other neurodegenerative syndromes. The claimed comparison is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Overlapping findings in ALS and other neuromuscular disorders assessed through EMG still need further testing and the engagement of a multidisciplinary team for interpretation to ensure an accurate diagnosis.

    “research shows that overlapping findings in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neuromuscular disorders assessed through electromyography (EMG) still need further testing and the engagement of a multidisciplinary team for interpretation to ensure an accurate diagnosis [52].”

    From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    Section 7 (page unavailable) says EMG does not guarantee a correct diagnosis, that other neuromuscular diseases can be difficult to distinguish from ALS, and that an experienced electrophysiologist should interpret the findings. Sections 9 and 12 discuss multidisciplinary ALS care and specialist evaluation, but do not say a multidisciplinary team is needed to interpret EMG; section 12 also cautions against unnecessary additional testing. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Insurance-related systemic issues often create significant challenges in obtaining prompt and accurate diagnostic services, especially for low-income individuals.

    “Insurance-related systemic issues often create significant challenges in obtaining prompt and accurate diagnostic services, especially for low-income individuals [52].”

    From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Summary and conclusion (section 12; page not provided) says medical insurance restrictions or financial hardship may limit access to appropriate multidisciplinary care for people with ALS. It does not establish that these issues often cause significant difficulty obtaining prompt, accurate diagnostic services, or that low-income individuals are especially affected. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This understanding can help prevent diagnostic errors and receive timely and effective care.

    “This understanding can help prevent diagnostic errors and receive timely and effective care [52,53].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Manjaly, 2010, The sex ratio in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A population based study, Amyotroph. Lateral Scler., 10.3109/17482961003610853 · DOI
  2. Palese, 2019, Predictors of diagnostic delay in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cohort study based on administrative and electronic medical records data, Amyotroph Lateral Scler Front Degener, 10.1080/21678421.2018.1550517 · DOI
  3. Chiò, 2013, Global epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review of the published literature, Neuroepidemiology, 10.1159/000351153 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hardiman, 2011, Clinical diagnosis and management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Nat. Rev. Neurol., 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.153 · DOI
  5. Brooks, 1994, El escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, J. Neurol. Sci., 10.1016/0022-510X(94)90191-0 · DOI
  6. Lomen-Hoerth, 2003, Are amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients cognitively normal?, Neurology, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000055861.95202.8D · DOI
  7. Lomen-Hoerth, 2002, The overlap of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, Neurology, 10.1212/WNL.59.7.1077 · DOI
  8. Poon, 2012, Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns contributing to missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers: A process analysis of closed malpractice claims, J. Gen. Intern. Med., 10.1007/s11606-012-2107-4 · DOI
  9. Aminzadeh, 2012, A review of barriers and enablers to diagnosis and management of persons with dementia in primary care, Can. Geriatr. J., 10.5770/cgj.15.42 · DOI
  10. Hamidou, 2017, Exploring the diagnosis delay and ALS functional impairment at diagnosis as relevant criteria for clinical trial enrolment*, Amyotroph Lateral Scler Front Degener., 10.1080/21678421.2017.1353098 · DOI
  11. Williams, 2013, Diagnosis pathway for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Retrospective analysis of the US Medicare longitudinal claims database, BMC Neurol., 10.1186/1471-2377-13-160 · DOI
  12. Galvin, 2017, The path to specialist multidisciplinary care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study of consultations, interventions and costs, PLoS One, 10.1371/journal.pone.0179796 · DOI
  13. Turner, 2010, The diagnostic pathway and prognosis in bulbar-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, J. Neurol. Sci., 10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.028 · DOI
  14. Paganoni, 2014, Diagnostic timelines and delays in diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Amyotroph Lateral Scler Front Degener., 10.3109/21678421.2014.903974 · DOI
  15. Belsh, 1990, Misdiagnosis in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Arch. Intern. Med., 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390220055011 · DOI
  16. Armstrong, 2020, Rural Residence and Diagnostic Delay for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Saskatchewan, Can. J. Neurol. Sci./J Can. des Sci. Neurol., 10.1017/cjn.2020.38 · DOI
  17. Nzwalo, 2014, Delayed diagnosis in ALS: The problem continues, J. Neurol. Sci., 10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.003 · DOI
  18. Chiò, 1999, ISIS Survey: An international study on the diagnostic process and its implications in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, J. Neurol.
  19. Mitchell, 2010, Timelines in the diagnostic evaluation of people with suspected amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND) -a 20-year review: can we do better?, Amyotroph. Lateral Scler., 10.3109/17482968.2010.495158 · DOI
  20. Cellura, 2012, Factors affecting the diagnostic delay in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg., 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.11.026 · DOI
  21. Kraemer, 2010, Diagnostic problems and delay of diagnosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg., 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.10.014 · DOI
  22. Vázquez-Costa, 2018, Analysis of the diagnostic pathway and delay in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Valencian Community, Neurologia
  23. Belsh, 1996, The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patient perspective on misdiagnosis and its repercussions, J. Neurol. Sci., 10.1016/0022-510X(96)00088-3 · DOI
  24. Househam, 2000, Diagnostic delay in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: what scope for improvement?, J. Neurol. Sci., 10.1016/S0022-510X(00)00418-4 · DOI
  25. Kano, 2013, Limb-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients visiting orthopedist show a longer time-to-diagnosis since symptom onset, BMC Neurol., 10.1186/1471-2377-13-19 · DOI
  26. Rocchetti, 2012, Modeling delay to diagnosis for Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Under reporting and incidence estimates, BMC Neurol., 10.1186/1471-2377-12-160 · DOI
  27. Srinivasan, 2006, Inappropriate surgeries resulting from misdiagnosis of early amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Muscle Nerve, 10.1002/mus.20555 · DOI
  28. Zoccolella, 2006, Predictors of delay in the diagnosis and clinical trial entry of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: A population-based study, J. Neurol. Sci., 10.1016/j.jns.2006.06.027 · DOI
  29. Rashed, 2020, Diagnostic delay among ALS patients: Egyptian study, Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener., 1
  30. Westeneng, 2018, Prognosis for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: development and validation of a personalised prediction model, Lancet Neurol., 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30089-9 · DOI
  31. Shayya, 2018, Predominance of Electrodiagnostic Abnormalities in Early-Stage Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Muscle Nerve, 10.1002/mus.26158 · DOI
  32. Braun, 2020, The revised El Escorial criteria “clinically probable laboratory supported ALS”-once a promising now a superfluous category?, Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener., 21, 24, 10.1080/21678421.2019.1666875 · DOI
  33. Van Den Berg, 2019, Revised Airlie House consensus guidelines for design and implementation of ALS clinical trials, Neurology, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007242 · DOI
  34. Van Eijk, 2019, Refining eligibility criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials, Neurology, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006855 · DOI
  35. Shook, 2009, Racing against the clock: Recognizing, differentiating, diagnosing, and referring the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient, Ann. Neurol., 10.1002/ana.21545 · DOI
  36. Lee, 1995, Prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the effect of referral selection, J. Neurol. Sci., 10.1016/0022-510X(95)00154-T · DOI
  37. Chiò, 2006, Positive effects of tertiary centres for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on outcome and use of hospital facilities, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 10.1136/jnnp.2005.083402 · DOI
  38. De Carvalho, 2015, Tackling diagnostic delays in ALS, Lancet Neurol., 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00020-4 · DOI
  39. Gelinas, 1999, Conceptual approach to diagnostic delay in ALS: A United States perspective, Neurology, 53, S17
  40. Eisen, 1999, How to improve the diagnostic process, J. Neurol.
  41. Torny, 2006, Étude des causes du retard au diagnostic de la sclérose latérale amyotrophique = Analysis of reasons for the late diagnosis of amylotrophic lateral sclerosis, Rev. Neurol. (Paris), 10.1016/S0035-3787(06)75055-X · DOI
  42. Li, 1991, Diagnosis of motor neuron disease by neurologists: A study in three countries, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 10.1136/jnnp.54.11.980 · DOI
  43. Koch, 2011, Dementia diagnosis andmanagement: A narrative review of changing practice, Br. J. Gen. Pract., 10.3399/bjgp11X588493 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Richards, D., Morren, J. A., & Pioro, E. P.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Morren, John A.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
417
Pages
117054
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045204869
Cited by
185
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Biogen
  • Avanir Pharmaceuticals
  • Cytokinetics
  • Otsuka America
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, time to diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, diagnosis, misdiagnosis, specialist referral, bulbar onset, symptom onset, diagnostic criteria, clinical trial recruitment
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Canada, Egypt, Europe, Humans, Japan, Delayed Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review