Cited by 41Voice and Speech DisordersArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Responsible development of clinical speech AI: Bridging the gap between clinical research and technology

Open access
Berisha, Visar, Liss, Julie M.·2024·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

This perspective article explores the challenges and potential of using speech as a biomarker in clinical settings, particularly when constrained by the small clinical datasets typically available in such contexts. We contend that by integrating insights from speech science and clinical research, we can reduce sample complexity in clinical speech AI models with the potential to decrease timelines to translation. Most existing models are based on high-dimensional feature representations trained with limited sample sizes and often do not leverage insights from speech science and clinical research. This approach can lead to overfitting, where the models perform exceptionally well on training data but fail to generalize to new, unseen data. Additionally, without incorporating theoretical knowledge, these models may lack interpretability and robustness, making them challenging to troubleshoot or improve post-deployment. We propose a framework for organizing health conditions based on their impact on speech and promote the use of speech analytics in diverse clinical contexts beyond cross-sectional classification. For high-stakes clinical use cases, we advocate for a focus on explainable and individually-validated measures and stress the importance of rigorous validation frameworks and ethical considerations for responsible deployment. Bridging the gap between AI research and clinical speech research presents new opportunities for more efficient translation of speech-based AI tools and advancement of scientific discoveries in this interdisciplinary space, particularly if limited to small or retrospective datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-024-01199-1

Cites

98 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical AI speech and language diagnostics can be too high stakes given the variable reliability of clinician judgment.

    “Clinical AI test sets that include typical speakers would be most useful for diagnostic classification of clinical speakers versus typical speakers, but we and others contend clinical AI speech and language diagnostics can be too high stakes given the variable reliability of clinician judgment (Berisha & Liss, 2024).”

    From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Berisha & Liss, 2024

    The Introduction cautions that stand-alone speech-based models are unlikely to achieve high diagnostic accuracy for some conditions and warns against premature deployment. The “Diagnostic assistance” section reports variable reliability in clinician-dependent assessments, but presents objective speech measures as a way to improve diagnosis; it does not say that clinician variability makes AI diagnostics too high stakes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [19]Baevski, A., Zhou, Y., Mohamed, A. & Auli, M. wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 12449–12460 (2020).
  2. [21]Achiam, J. et al. GPT-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023). · arXiv
  3. [22]Kenton, J. D. M.-W. C. & Toutanova, L. K. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of naacL-HLT, vol. 1, 2 (2019).
  4. [27]Boushra, M. & McDowell, C. Stroke-Like Conditions (StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), 2023). http://europepmc.org/books/NBK541044. 31082088
  5. [41]Raphael, L. J., Borden, G. J. & Harris, K. S. Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007).
  6. [43]Duffy, J. R. In Motor Speech Disorders-E-Book: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012).
  7. [50]Kaufman, J. M., Thommandram, A. & Fossat, Y. Acoustic analysis and prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus using smartphone-recorded voice segments. Mayo Clin. Proc.: Digit. Health 1, 534–544 (2023). PMC11975753 40206319
  8. [78]Jacobson, N. C., Kowatsch, T. & Marsch, L. A. Digital therapeutics for mental health and addiction: The state of the science and vision for the future (Academic Press, 2022).
  9. [80]Li, W., Dasarathy, G. & Berisha, V. Regularization via structural label smoothing. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1453–1463 (PMLR, 2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berisha, V., & Liss, J. M.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Berisha, Visar
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-08-09
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
208-208
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401450033
Cited by
41
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 15
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
The JTMF Foundation is the John and Tami Marick Family Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
overfitting, model generalization, speech science, clinical research, speech analytics, explainable AI, model validation, responsible AI, interdisciplinary research, speech disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review