Cited by 39Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDental Radiography and ImagingDental Education, Practice, Research

Attitude, perception and barriers of dental professionals towards artificial intelligence

Open access
Singh, Nishi, Pandey, Anushka, Tikku, Aseem Prakash, Verma, Promila, Singh, Balendra Pratap·2023·Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research

Abstract

Aim: To know attitudes, perceptions and barriers towards the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in dentistry in India among undergraduate and postgraduate students. Methodology: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted among participants pursuing graduation and postgraduation. The questionnaire consisted of 23 close-ended and 2 open-ended questions divided into various sections of attitude, perception and barriers. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0. Result: Out of 937 responses, 55.2% responded that they get information about AI from social media platforms. 51.3% of respondents have basic knowledge about the use of AI in dentistry. 59.6% agreed that AI can be used as a "definitive diagnostic tool" in the diagnosis of diseases. 66.5% agreed that AI can be used for radiographic diagnosis of tooth caries. 71.3% stated that AI can be used as a "treatment planning tool" in dentistry. 55.7% stated that AI should be part of undergraduate dental training. Conclusion: This study concluded that both dental students are aware of the concept of AI. Participants were positive when asked if AI can increase the efficiency of diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning procedures as well as in managing patient data. Both participants believed that the barriers to the introduction of AI in dentistry are a lack of technical resources and a lack of training personnel in college.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.06.006

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Artificial intelligence and echocardiography - PubMed [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30400053/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, N., Pandey, A., Tikku, A. P., Verma, P., & Singh, B. P.
Affiliations
King George's Medical University (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, Nishi
Venue
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
584-588
ISSN
2212-4268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385438120
Cited by
39
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Indian Council of Medical Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
artificial intelligence in dentistry, dental students, attitudes toward AI, perceptions of AI, AI adoption barriers, AI knowledge, AI-assisted diagnosis, dental education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review