Cited by 1,446Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDental Radiography and ImagingAI in cancer detection

Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Chances and Challenges

Open access
Schwendicke, F., Samek, W., Krois, J.·2020·Journal of Dental Research

Abstract

The term “artificial intelligence” (AI) refers to the idea of machines being capable of performing human tasks. A subdomain of AI is machine learning (ML), which “learns” intrinsic statistical patterns in data to eventually cast predictions on unseen data. Deep learning is a ML technique using multi-layer mathematical operations for learning and inferring on complex data like imagery. This succinct narrative review describes the application, limitations and possible future of AI-based dental diagnostics, treatment planning, and conduct, for example, image analysis, prediction making, record keeping, as well as dental research and discovery. AI-based applications will streamline care, relieving the dental workforce from laborious routine tasks, increasing health at lower costs for a broader population, and eventually facilitate personalized, predictive, preventive, and participatory dentistry. However, AI solutions have not by large entered routine dental practice, mainly due to 1) limited data availability, accessibility, structure, and comprehensiveness, 2) lacking methodological rigor and standards in their development, 3) and practical questions around the value and usefulness of these solutions, but also ethics and responsibility. Any AI application in dentistry should demonstrate tangible value by, for example, improving access to and quality of care, increasing efficiency and safety of services, empowering and enabling patients, supporting medical research, or increasing sustainability. Individual privacy, rights, and autonomy need to be put front and center; a shift from centralized to distributed/federated learning may address this while improving scalability and robustness. Lastly, trustworthiness into, and generalizability of, dental AI solutions need to be guaranteed; the implementation of continuous human oversight and standards grounded in evidence-based dentistry should be expected. Methods to visualize, interpret, and explain the logic behind AI solutions will contribute (“explainable AI”). Dental education will need to accompany the introduction of clinical AI solutions by fostering digital literacy in the future dental workforce.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022034520915714

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bubba TA Kutyniok G Lassas M März M Samek W Siltanen S Srinivasan V. 2019 Learning the invisible: a hybrid deep learning-shearlet framework for limited angle computed tomography. Inverse Probl. 35(6):064002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ab10ca. · DOI
  2. El Naqa I Ruan D Valdes G Dekker A McNutt T Ge Y Wu QJ Oh JH Thor M Smith W, et al 2018 Machine learning and modeling: data, validation, communication challenges. Med Phys. 45(10): e834– e840. 30144098 PMC6181755
  3. England JR Cheng PM 2019 Artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: a guide for authors and reviewers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 212(3): 513– 519. 30557049
  4. Hornik K 1991 Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw. 4(2): 251– 257.
  5. Israni ST Verghese A. 2019 Humanizing artificial intelligence. JAMA. 321(1): 29– 30. 30535297
  6. Kolossváry M De Cecco CN Feuchtner G Maurovich-Horvat P. 2019 Advanced atherosclerosis imaging by CT: radiomics, machine learning and deep learning. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 13(5): 274– 280. 31029649
  7. Lapuschkin S Wäldchen S Binder A Montavon G Samek W Müller K-R. 2019 Unmasking Clever Hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn. Nat Commun. 10(1): 1096. PMC6411769 30858366
  8. Moons KG Altman DG Reitsma JB Ioannidis JP Macaskill P Steyerberg EW Vickers AJ Ransohoff DF Collins GS 2015 Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 162(1): W1– 73. 25560730
  9. Naylor CD 2018 On the prospects for a (deep) learning health care system. JAMA. 320(11): 1099– 1100. 30178068
  10. Samek W Montavon G Vedaldi A Hansen L Müller K. 2019 Explainable AI: interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning. Berlin: Springer.
  11. Sattler F Wiedemann S Müller K Samek W. 2019 Robust and communication-efficient federated learning from non-i.i.d. data. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst [epub ahead of print 01 Nov 2019] in press. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8889996. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2944481 31689214 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Schwendicke F Golla T Dreher M Krois J. 2019 Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: a scoping review. J Dent. 91: 103226. 31704386
  13. Strubell E Ganesh A McCallum A. 2019 Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 3645– 3650.
  14. Walsh T 2018 Fuzzy gold standards: approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard. J Dent. 74 Suppl 1: S47– S49. 29929589
  15. Wu J Liu X Zhang X He Z Lv P. 2018 Master clinical medical knowledge at certificated-doctor-level with deep learning model. Nat Commun. 9(1): 4352. 30341328 PMC6195515

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwendicke, F., Samek, W., & Krois, J.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute (DE)
Corresponding author
Schwendicke, F.
Venue
Journal of Dental Research
Published
2020-04-21
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
769-774
ISSN
  • 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-0591
OpenAlex
W3016417837
Cited by
1,446
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 448 · 2025: 359 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 8
FWCI
26.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dental Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
artificial intelligence in dentistry, machine learning, deep learning, dental diagnosis, treatment planning, dental image analysis, data availability, AI ethics, federated learning, explainable AI, digital literacy, dental education, evidence-based dentistry
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Dentistry, Forecasting, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review