Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 543

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells?

Open access
Im, Gun-II, Shin, Yong-Woon, Lee, Kee-Byung·2005·Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ATMSCs) have been shown to differentiate into bone, cartilage, fat or muscle. However, it is not certain that ATMSCs are equal to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSC) for their bone and cartilage forming potential. The purpose of this study was to answer the question. METHODS BMMSCs were obtained from the medullary canal of femur and ATMSCs were isolated from the fat harvested during liposuction procedures. After cell expansion in culture media and two passages, the immunofluorescent studies for STRO-1 and CD34 were performed to characterize the BMMSCs and ATMSCs. Osteogenesis was induced on a monolayer culture with osteogenic medium containing dexamethasone, beta-glycerophosphate and ascorbate. After 2-3 weeks, alkaline phosphatase (AP) and Von Kossa staining were done. To test for chondrogenesis, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were cultured in a pellet culture and in a fibrin scaffold with a chondrogenic medium (CM) containing transforming growth factor-beta(2) and insulin-like growth factor-I. After 4 weeks, Safranin-O staining and immunohistochemical staining for type II collagen were done to evaluate the chondrogenic differentiation and the matrix production. A histological scale was used to semiquantitatively assess the degree of chondrogenesis. RESULTS Both BMMSCs and ATMSCs were STRO-1 positive and CD34 negative. On the test of osteogenesis, the osteoblastic differentiation of ATMSCs as demonstrated by AP staining was much less than that of the BMMSCs (P=0.002). The amount of matrix mineralization shown by Von Kossa staining also showed statistical differences between the two MSCs (P=0.011). On the test for chondrogenesis by the pellet culture ATMSCs showed much weaker presentation as chondrogenic cells in both cell morphology and the matrix production. The histological score was 6.5 (SD1.3) for the BMMSCs, and 4.3 (SD1.6) for the ATMSCs cultured in CM, which was statistically significant (P=0.023). The results from fibrin gel paralleled those from the pellet culture in general. CONCLUSION The results of our study suggest that the ATMSCs may have an inferior potential for both osteogenesis and chondrogenesis compared with the BMMSCs, and these cast doubts on the value of adipose tissue as a source of MSCs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joca.2005.05.005

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 543

Metadata

Authors
Im, G.-I., Shin, Y.-W., & Lee, K.-B.
Venue
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
845-853
ISSN
1063-4584 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085662881
Cited by
543
References
37
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joca.2005.05.005
The paper
Im, G.-I., Shin, Y.-W., & Lee, K.-B. (2005). Do adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells? Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.05.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.