CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 91Bone health and osteoporosis researchHip and Femur FracturesMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Joint Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®

Open access
Hans, Didier B., Kanis, John A., Baim, Sanford, Bilezikian, John P., Binkley, Neil, Cauley, Jane A., Compston, Juliet E., Cooper, Cyrus, Dawson-Hughes, Bess, El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ghada, Leslie, William D., Lewiecki, E. Michael, Luckey, Marjorie M., McCloskey, Eugene V., Papapoulos, Socrates E., Poiana, Catalina, Rizzoli, René·2011·Journal of Clinical Densitometry
DOI 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) convened the FRAX(®) Position Development Conference (PDC) in Bucharest, Romania, on November 14, 2010, following a two-day joint meeting of the ISCD and IOF on the "Interpretation and Use of FRAX(®) in Clinical Practice." These three days of critical discussion and debate, led by a panel of international experts from the ISCD, IOF and dedicated task forces, have clarified a number of important issues pertaining to the interpretation and implementation of FRAX(®) in clinical practice. The Official Positions resulting from the PDC are intended to enhance the quality and clinical utility of fracture risk assessment worldwide. Since the field of skeletal assessment is still evolving rapidly, some clinically important issues addressed at the PDCs are not associated with robust medical evidence. Accordingly, some Official Positions are based largely on expert opinion. Despite limitations inherent in such a process, the ISCD and IOF believe it is important to provide clinicians and technologists with the best distillation of current knowledge in the discipline of bone densitometry and provide an important focus for the scientific community to consider. This report describes the methodology and results of the ISCD-IOF PDC dedicated to FRAX(®).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Lenchik, 2002, Executive summary International Society for Clinical Densitometry position development conference Denver, Colorado July 20–22, 2001, J Clin Densitom, 5, S1, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S01 · DOI
  2. 2004, Executive Summary, J Clin Densitom, 7, 7, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:7 · DOI
  3. 2004, Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women and children, J Clin Densitom, 7, 17, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:17 · DOI
  4. 2004, Indications and reporting for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 37, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:37 · DOI
  5. 2004, Introduction, Methods and Participants, J Clin Densitom, 7, 13, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:13 · DOI
  6. 2004, Nomenclature and decimal places in bone densitometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 45, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:45 · DOI
  7. Leib, 2004, Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 1, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:1 · DOI
  8. 2004, Technical standardization for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, J Clin Densitom, 7, 27, 10.1385/JCD:7:1:27 · DOI
  9. Leib, 2002, Position statements of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: Methodology, J Clin Densitom, 5, S5, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S05 · DOI
  10. Hamdy, 2002, Which central dual X-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S11, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S11 · DOI
  11. Binkley, 2002, What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S19, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S19 · DOI
  12. Lenchik, 2002, What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S29, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S29 · DOI
  13. Miller, 2002, What are the standards by which bone mass measurement at peripheral skeletal sites should be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis?, J Clin Densitom, 5, S39, 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S39 · DOI
  14. Binkley, 2006, Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and Executive Summary of the 2005 Position Development Conference, J Clin Densitom, 9, 4, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.002 · DOI
  15. Shepherd, 2006, Cross-calibration and minimum precisions standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: The 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 31, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.005 · DOI
  16. Hans, 2006, Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: The 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 15, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.003 · DOI
  17. Leslie, 2006, Application of the 1994 WHO Classification to Populations other than postmenopausal Caucasian women: The 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 22, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.004 · DOI
  18. Vokes, 2006, Vertebral Fracture Assessment: The 2005 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 9, 37, 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.006 · DOI
  19. Hans, 2008, Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 188, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.012 · DOI
  20. Krieg, 2008, Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 163, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.011 · DOI
  21. Engelke, 2008, Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 123, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Simonelli, 2008, Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Technical issues: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 109, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.009 · DOI
  23. Schousboe, 2008, Vertebral Fracture Assessment: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 92, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.008 · DOI
  24. Baim, 2008, Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference, J Clin Densitom, 11, 75, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Zemel, 2008, Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in children and adolescents: the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 59, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.006 · DOI
  26. Gordon, 2008, Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 43, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.005 · DOI
  27. Bishop, 2008, Dual-energy X-ray aborptiometry assessment in children and adolescents with diseases that may affect the skeleton: the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 29, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.004 · DOI
  28. Rauch, 2008, Fracture prediction and the definition of osteoporosis in children and adolescents: the ISCD 2007 Pediatric Official Positions, J Clin Densitom, 11, 22, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.003 · DOI
  29. Baim, 2008, Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Position Development Conference, J Clin Densitom, 11, 6, 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.002 · DOI
  30. Kanis, 2008, FRAX® and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK, Osteoporos Int, 19, 385, 10.1007/s00198-007-0543-5 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Anonymous 2002 Cochrane Reviews Handbook, vol. 4.1.5. Oxford.
  32. Fitch, 2001, The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual, The RAND Corporation
  33. Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, and the Task Force of the FRAX Initiative Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. 2011 Osteoporosis International. In press.
  34. Lewiecki, 2011, Official positions for FRAX® bone mineral density and FRAX® simplification, J Clin Densitom, 14, 226, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.017 · DOI
  35. McCloskey, 2011, FRAX® clinical task force of the 2010 joint international society for clinical densitometry & international osteoporosis foundation position development conference, J Clin Densitom, 14, 181, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.013 · DOI
  36. Broy, 2011, Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding rheumatoid arthritis, J Clin Densitom, 14, 184, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.012 · DOI
  37. Dimai, 2011, Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding smoking, J Clin Densitom, 14, 190, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.011 · DOI
  38. Masud, 2011, Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding falls and frailty: Can falls and frailty be used in FRAX®?, J Clin Densitom, 14, 194, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.010 · DOI
  39. Blank, 2011, Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding prior fractures, J Clin Densitom, 14, 205, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.009 · DOI
  40. Leib, 2011, Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding glucocorticoids: The impact of the use of glucocorticoids on the estimate by FRAX® of the 10 year risk of fracture, J Clin Densitom, 14, 212, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.014 · DOI
  41. McCloskey, 2011, Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding biochemical markers, J Clin Densitom, 14, 220, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.008 · DOI
  42. Lewiecki, 2011, FRAX® bone mineral density task force of the 2010 joint international society for clinical densitometry & international osteoporosis foundation position development conference, J Clin Densitom, 14, 223, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.018 · DOI
  43. Cauley, 2011, FRAX® international task force of the 2010 joint international society for clinical densitometry & international osteoporosis foundation position development conference, J Clin Densitom, 14, 237, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.016 · DOI
  44. Cauley, 2011, Official positions for frax® clinical regarding international differences, J Clin Densitom, 14, 240, 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hans, D. B., Kanis, J. A., Baim, S., Bilezikian, J. P., Binkley, N., Cauley, J. A., Compston, J. E., Cooper, C., Dawson-Hughes, B., El-Hajj Fuleihan, G., Leslie, W. D., Lewiecki, E. M., Luckey, M. M., McCloskey, E. V., Papapoulos, S. E., Poiana, C., & Rizzoli, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Saint Barnabas Medical Center (US)
  • Northern General Hospital (GB)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Hans, Didier B.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
171-180
ISSN
1094-6950 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.007
OpenAlex
W2137949218
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Densitometry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0508-10082)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
FRAX, fracture risk assessment, osteoporosis, bone mineral density, fracture risk prediction, International Osteoporosis Foundation, expert consensus
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Femur Neck, Hip Fractures, Humans, Osteoporosis, Risk Factors, Societies, Medical, Models, Statistical, Absorptiometry, Photon, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Bone, Osteoporotic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review