The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus statement on concussion in sport – The 3rd International Conference on concussion in sport, held in Zurich, November 2008
Abstract
Preamble This paper is a revision and update of the recommendations developed following the 1 (Vienna) and 2 (Prague) International Symposia on Concussion in Sport. The Zurich Consensus statement is designed to build on the principles outlined in the original Vienna and Prague documents and to develop further conceptual understanding of this problem using a formal consensus-based approach. A detailed description of the consensus process is outlined at the end of this document under the ‘‘Background’’ section (see Section 11). This document is developed for use by physicians, therapists, certified athletic trainers, health professionals, coaches and other people involved in the care of injured athletes, whether at the recreational, elite or professional level. While agreement exists pertaining to principal messages conveyed within this document, the authors acknowledge that the science of concussion is evolving and therefore management and return to play decisions remain in the realm of clinical judgment on an individualized basis. Readers are encouraged to copy and distribute freely the Zurich Consensus document and/or the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) card, and neither is subject to any copyright restriction. The authors request, however, that the document and/or the SCAT2 card be distributed in their full and complete format. The following focus questions formed the foundation for the Zurich concussion consensus statement:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guskiewicz, K. M., Marshall, S. W., Bailes, J., McCrea, M., Cantu, R. C., Randolph, C., & Jordan, B. D. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000175725.75780.dd · Cited by 1,197
Self-citationRecurrent Concussion and Risk of Depression in Retired Professional Football Players
GUSKIEWICZ, K. M., MARSHALL, S. W., BAILES, J., MCCREA, M., HARDING, H. P., MATTHEWS, A., MIHALIK, J. R., & CANTU, R. C. (2007) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180383da5 · Cited by 928
Self-citationChronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in a National Football League Player
Omalu, B. I., DeKosky, S. T., Minster, R. L., Kamboh, M. I., Hamilton, R. L., & Wecht, C. H. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000163407.92769.ed · Cited by 894
Chamelian, L., & Feinstein, A. (2006) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.18.1.33 · Cited by 174
Cited by
The epidemiology of sport-related concussion
Daneshvar, D. H., Nowinski, C. J., McKee, A. C., & Cantu, R. C. (2011) · Clinics in Sports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.csm.2010.08.006 · Cited by 681
Self-citationMcKee, A. C., Daneshvar, D. H., Alvarez, V. E., & Stein, T. D. (2014) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1230-6 · Cited by 422
Cubon, V. A., Putukian, M., Boyer, C., & Dettwiler, A. (2011) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1430 · Cited by 297
Concussion in chronic traumatic encephalopathy
Stein, T. D., Alvarez, V. E., & McKee, A. C. (2015) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-015-0522-z · Cited by 177
Vriend, I., Gouttebarge, V., Finch, C. F., van Mechelen, W., & Verhagen, E. A. L. M. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0718-y · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- McCrory, P., Meeuwisse, W., Johnston, K., Dvorak, J., Aubry, M., Molloy, M., & Cantu, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 755-763
- ISSN
- 0967-5868 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4239626544
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
