Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase 2 trial of temozolomide and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme following concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Ananda, Sumitra, Nowak, Anna K., Cher, Lawrence, Dowling, Anthony, Brown, Chris, Simes, John, Rosenthal, Mark A.·2011·Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Concurrent and post-radiotherapy temozolomide (T) significantly improves survival in patient with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. We aimed to assess the activity of the combination of T and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in this population. A combination of T (days 1-5, 200mg/m(2) orally) and PLD (day 1, 40 mg/m(2) intravenous) was given every 4 weeks for six cycles following chemo-radiotherapy as a post-operative treatment. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (6PFS). Of the 40 patients who enrolled (53 years median age, 73% male), the 6PFS was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-72%). The median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6-8.0 months) and overall survival (OS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.7-15.8 months). Thirty-four patients had measurable disease: one had a complete response (3%), 28 had stable disease (82%), and five had progressive disease (15%). Treatment was well tolerated: hematological toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia (8%). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity included nausea and vomiting (8%) and palmar-plantar toxicity (5%). We concluded that combination T and PLD is well tolerated but does not add significant clinical benefit regarding 6PFS and OS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.026

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Jemal, 2002, Cancer statistics, 2002, CA Cancer J Clin, 52, 23
  2. Stupp, 2005, Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma, N Engl J Med, 352, 987, 10.1056/NEJMoa043330 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Stupp, 2009, Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial, Lancet Oncol, 10, 459, 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7 · DOI
  4. Gabizon, 1994, Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes, Cancer Res, 54, 987
  5. Uziely, 1995, Liposomal doxorubicin: antitumor activity and unique toxicities during two complementary phase I studies, J Clin Oncol, 13, 1777, 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1777 · DOI
  6. Siegal, 1995, Doxorubicin encapsulated in sterically stabilized liposomes for the treatment of a brain tumor model: biodistribution and therapeutic efficacy, J Neurosurg, 83, 1029, 10.3171/jns.1995.83.6.1029 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hau, 2004, Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-efficacy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma, Cancer, 100, 1199, 10.1002/cncr.20073 · DOI
  8. Sharma, 1997, Liposome-mediated therapy of intracranial brain tumors in a rat model, Pharm Res, 14, 992, 10.1023/A:1012136925030 · DOI
  9. Volm, 2000, A phase I study of liposomal doxorubicin, temozolomide in patients with advanced cancer, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 19
  10. Chua, 2004, Phase 2 study of temozolomide and Caelyx in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, Neuro-oncol, 6, 38, 10.1215/S1152851703000188 · DOI
  11. Simon, 1989, Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials, Control Clin Trials, 10, 1, 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fine, 1993, Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults, Cancer, 71, 2585, 10.1002/1097-0142(19930415)71:8<2585::AID-CNCR2820710825>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  13. Stewart, 2002, Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials, Lancet, 359, 1011, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08091-1 · DOI
  14. Walker, 1978, Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial, J Neurosurg, 49, 333, 10.3171/jns.1978.49.3.0333 · DOI
  15. Medical Research Council Brain Tumor Working Party. Randomized trial of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in the adjuvant treatment of high-grade astrocytoma: a Medical Research Council trial. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:509–18. · DOI
  16. Clarke, 1999, KRN8602 (MX2-hydrochloride): an active new agent for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma, J Clin Oncol, 17, 2579, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2579 · DOI
  17. Fabel, 2001, Long-term stabilization in patients with malignant glioma after treatment with liposomal doxorubicin, Cancer, 92, 1936, 10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:7<1936::AID-CNCR1712>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  18. Harris, 2001, An Australian experience with temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent high grade gliomas, J Clin Neurosci, 8, 325, 10.1054/jocn.2000.0809 · DOI
  19. Stupp, 2001, Current and future developments in the use of temozolomide for the treatment of brain tumours, Lancet Oncol, 2, 552, 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00489-2 · DOI
  20. Yung, 1999, Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse. Temodal Brain Tumor Group, J Clin Oncol, 17, 2762, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2762 · DOI
  21. Lamborn, 2008, Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas, Neuro-oncol, 10, 162, 10.1215/15228517-2007-062 · DOI
  22. Wen, 2010, Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group, J Clin Oncol, 28, 1963, 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ananda, S., Nowak, A. K., Cher, L., Dowling, A., Brown, C., Simes, J., & Rosenthal, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1444-1448
ISSN
0967-5868
Cited by
116
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review