Cited by 3Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Single sagittal craniosynostosis surgical treatment with the “Peau d́ours” technique. Single-center experience in Mexico

Arenas-Ruiz, José Ascención, Martínez-Maldonado, Horus, Hernández-Segura, Natalia Edith, Villarreal-Silva, Eliud Enrique, González-Carranza, Vicente, Torres-García, Samuel, Chico-Ponce de León, Fernando·2022·Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Scaphocephaly (SC) is defined as an elongation of the anteroposterior axis of the skull resulting from the abnormal fusion of the sagittal suture. This study describes the "Peau d'ours" technique and results for correcting SC. We conducted a consecutive and retrospective analysis of patients treated from 2011 to 2016. We evaluated the gender, age, and surgical outcomes. A total of 53 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 19 months old. The advantages of this technique are healthy coronal and lambdoid suture preservation and symmetrical parietal bone flap opening. This technique is safe and simple to reproduce, allowing good surgical outcomes with a low incidence of secondary craniosynostosis. This technique is ideal for patients older than six months old.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.02.016

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternative surgical techniques such as the Peau d'Ours technique, triple square extended osteotomies, and transsutural distraction osteogenesis remain limited to specialized centres and lack widespread clinical acceptance due to their complexity and the availability of more established techniques.

    “Despite ongoing advancements, several alternative surgical techniques remain limited to specialized centres. Approaches such as the Peau d'Ours technique, triple square extended osteotomies, and transsutural distraction osteogenesis have been explored but lack widespread clinical acceptance due to their complexity and the availability of more established techniques [54, 81–84].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arenas-Ruiz, J. A., Martínez-Maldonado, H., Hernández-Segura, N. E., Villarreal-Silva, E. E., González-Carranza, V., Torres-García, S., & Chico-Ponce de León, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX)
  • Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (MX)
Corresponding author
Arenas-Ruiz, José Ascención
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
99
Pages
73-77
ISSN
0967-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220656878
Cited by
3
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal craniosynostosis, scaphocephaly, craniosynostosis surgery, surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Humans, Infant, Mexico, Retrospective Studies, Skull

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review