Cited by 185Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis

Jimenez, David F., Barone, Constance M., McGee, Maria E., Cartwright, Cathy C., Baker, C. Lynette·2004·Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

Abstract

Object Endoscopic techniques were introduced 7 years ago for the surgical management of patients with sagittal synostosis. In this study of 139 patients with sagittal synostosis, the authors assessed the efficacy, safety, complications, and outcomes after performing endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomies with bitemporal and biparietal barrel stave osteotomies. Methods The sample population consisted of a total of 99 boys and 40 girls who ranged in age from 0.4 to 9.2 months (mean 3.6 months). Two small incisions were made near the lambda and vertex. Using endoscopic visualization, wide-vertex craniectomies with bilateral temporal and parietal barrel stave osteotomies were performed. Postoperative treatment included custom-made surlyn cranial orthotic devices for cranial reshaping and maintenance. The mean craniectomy width was 5.4 cm and the length was 10 cm. The overall blood transfusion rate was 9% (two intraoperative and 12 postoperative transfusions). The mean estimated blood loss was 29 ml (range 5-150 ml). The mean preoperative hematocrit was 32%, whereas the postoperative level was 27%. One hundred thirty-two patients were discharged the morning following surgery. The majority of patients did not experience facial swelling, and none suffered postoperative fevers. Anthropometric cephalic index measurements indicated that excellent results were obtained in 87% of the patients (cephalic index > 75); good results in 8.7% (cephalic index 70-75); and poor results in 4.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/ped.2004.100.5.0407

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jimenez, D. F., Barone, C. M., McGee, M. E., Cartwright, C. C., & Baker, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri Health System (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Published
2004-05
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
407-417
ISSN
1933-0707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122255052
Cited by
185
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal synostosis, craniosynostosis, cranial vault reconstruction, cranial orthosis, cephalic index, surgical complications, blood loss
MeSH terms
Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Endoscopy, Female, Head Protective Devices, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Osteotomy, Postoperative Care, Blood Loss, Surgical, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review