CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance

Schlösser, Thomas, Dunning, David, Johnson, Kerri L., Kruger, Justin·2013·Journal of Economic Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Ackerman, 2002, What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge, Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 587, 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00174-X · DOI
  2. Amemiya, 1973, Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal, Econometrica, 41, 997, 10.2307/1914031 · DOI
  3. Austin, 2008, “I just don’t know what I’m supposed to know”: Evaluating self-assessment skills of international pharmacy graduates in Canada, Administrative Pharmacy, 4, 115, 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.03.002 · DOI
  4. Burson, 2006, Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 60, 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.60 · DOI
  5. Caputo, 2005, What you don’t know: The role played by errors of omission in imperfect self-assessments, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 488, 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.09.006 · DOI
  6. Dunning, 2011, The Dunning–Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance, Vol. 44, 247
  7. Dunning, 2003, Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83, 10.1111/1467-8721.01235 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Economist, 2004, The curse of nepotism, The Economist, 27
  9. Ehrlinger, 2008, Why the unskilled are unaware? Further explorations of (lack of) self-insight among the incompetent, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 98, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fagin, 1988, Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, 34, 39, 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90003-8 · DOI
  11. Ferraro, 2010, Know thyself: Competence and self-awareness, Atlantic Economic Journal, 38, 183, 10.1007/s11293-010-9226-2 · DOI
  12. Haun, 2000, Assessing the competence of specimen-processing personnel, Laboratory Medicine, 31, 633, 10.1309/8Y66-NCN2-J8NH-U66R · DOI
  13. Heifetz, 2006, Interactive unawareness, Journal of Economic Theory, 130, 78, 10.1016/j.jet.2005.02.007 · DOI
  14. Helzer, 2012, Why and when peer prediction is superior to self-prediction: The weight given to future aspiration versus past achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 38, 10.1037/a0028124 · DOI
  15. Krajč, 2008, Are the unskilled really that unaware? An alternative explanation, Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 724, 10.1016/j.joep.2007.12.006 · DOI
  16. Krueger, 2002, Unskilled, unaware, or both? The contribution of social–perceptual skills and statistical regression to self-enhancement biases, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 180, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.180 · DOI
  17. Kruger, 1999, Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kruger, 2002, Unskilled and unaware—But why? A reply to Krueger and Mueller, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 189, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.189 · DOI
  19. Miller, 2011, Training metacognition in the classroom: The influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions, Metacognition & Learning, 6, 303, 10.1007/s11409-011-9083-7 · DOI
  20. Mynttinsen, 2009, Self-assessed driver competence among novice drivers: A comparison of driving test candidate assessments and examiner assessments in a Dutch and Finnish sample, Journal of Safety Research, 40, 301, 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.04.006 · DOI
  21. Park, 2010, Overconfidence in tournaments: Evidence from the field, Theory and Decision, 69, 143, 10.1007/s11238-010-9200-0 · DOI
  22. Ross, 1977, The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279, 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X · DOI · Paper page
  23. Rothschild, 1976, Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 629, 10.2307/1885326 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ryvkin, 2012, Are the unskilled doomed to remain unaware?, Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 1012, 10.1016/j.joep.2012.06.003 · DOI
  25. Sheldon, O. J., Dunning, D., & Ames, D. R. (in press). Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology. · DOI
  26. Simons, 2013, Unskilled and optimistic: Overconfident predictions despite calibrated knowledge of relative skill, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 601, 10.3758/s13423-013-0379-2 · DOI
  27. Spence, 1973, Job market signaling, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355, 10.2307/1882010 · DOI
  28. Williams, 2013, The hobgoblin of consistency: Algorithmic judgment strategies underlie inflated self-assessments of performance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 976, 10.1037/a0032416 · DOI
  29. Zenger, 1992, Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 198, 10.2307/2393221 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schlösser, T., Dunning, D., Johnson, K. L., & Kruger, J.
Venue
Journal of Economic Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
39
Pages
85-100
ISSN
0167-4870
DOI
10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.004
Cited by
166
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0745806)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review