Cited by 106Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and Medication ImpactDiabetes Management and Research

Guideline No. 393-Diabetes in Pregnancy

Berger, Howard, Gagnon, Robert, Sermer, Mathew·2019·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Abstract

Objectives This guideline reviews the evidence relating to the diagnosis and obstetrical management of diabetes in pregnancy. Outcomes The outcomes evaluated were short and long-term maternal outcomes including pre-eclampsia, Caesarean section, future diabetes and other cardiovascular complications; and fetal outcomes including congenital anomalies, stillbirth, macrosomia, birth trauma, hypoglycemia and long-term effects. Evidence Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and The Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary (MeSH terms "diabetes" and "pregnancy"). Where appropriate, results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits but results were limited to English or French language materials. Values The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Summary statements RECOMMENDATIONS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.008

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Canada, the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus changed from 3.8 to 6.5% (SOGC) or 2.0-4.0% (DA) in 1992 to 7.0% using the two-step method or 16.1% using the one-step method.

    “Analyzing the data, the incidence of GDM changed from 3.8 to 6.5% (SOGC) or 2.0–4.0% (DA) in 1992 to 7.0% using the two-step method or to 16.1% using the one-step method.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, H., Gagnon, R., & Sermer, M.
Corresponding author
Berger, Howard
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
1814-1825.e1
ISSN
1701-2163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990526949
Cited by
106
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-10-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-existing diabetes mellitus, preconception care, glycemic control, stillbirth, preeclampsia, cesarean section, shoulder dystocia, macrosomia, type 2 diabetes risk, glucose challenge test, 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, fetal monitoring, multidisciplinary management, congenital malformations
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Preventive Health Services, Diabetes, Gestational, Stillbirth, Perinatal Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review