The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of the Maternity Blues in the Postpartum Period
Abstract
Objective To determine the prevalence of maternity blues among women in the postpartum period.Data sources We conducted our systematic review and meta-analysis by searching the literature for relevant articles published in three international databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from date of inception through December 11, 2019, using the keywords prevalence, incidence, maternity blues, and baby blues.Study selection From 336 articles initially screened, we included 26 articles in the systematic review and meta-analysis.Data extraction Two independent reviewers used a standardized form to extract data from eligible articles. We evaluated the quality of individual studies and the overall evidence according to Hoy et al.'s risk of bias tool.Data synthesis The prevalence of maternity blues in the 26 included studies was 13.7% to 76.0%. Based on the results of the random effects model, the prevalence of maternity blues in 5,667 women was 39.0% (95% confidence interval [32.3, 45.6]; I 2 = 96.6%). The prevalence of maternity blues among women in Africa was greatest at 49.6%.Conclusion Considering the great prevalence of maternity blues in women after childbirth, paying attention to the key symptoms of maternity blues and implementing educational programs for health care providers and mothers after childbirth are essential.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Postpartum blues is a high prevalence, transient phenomenon, thought to be caused by hormonal changes after delivery, affecting up to half of new mothers in the first week postpartum (Bass III and Bauer, 2018; Rezaie-Keikhaie et al., 2020).”
From Associations between maternal psychological distress and mother-infant bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Rezaie-Keikhaie et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement
McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & Lefebvre, C. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021 · Cited by 5,700
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Woolf, A., Blyth, F., March, L., Bain, C., Baker, P., Smith, E., & Buchbinder, R. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 · Cited by 2,555
Postpartum depression: current status and future directions
O'Hara, M. W., & McCabe, J. E. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185612 · Cited by 1,750
Gelaye, B., Rondon, M. B., Araya, R., & Williams, M. A. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30284-x · Cited by 1,155
Treatment and prevention of mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries
Patel, V., Araya, R., Chatterjee, S., Chisholm, D., Cohen, A., De Silva, M., Hosman, C., McGuire, H., Rojas, G., & van Ommeren, M. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61240-9 · Cited by 930
Magnitude and risk factors for postpartum symptoms: A literature review
Norhayati, M. N., Nik Hazlina, N. H., Asrenee, A. R., & Wan Emilin, W. M. A. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.041 · Cited by 816
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gautam, 2014, Sheehan’s syndrome with psychosis: A rare case presentation, Delhi Psychiatry Journal, 17, 211
- 2011, Vol. 4
- Moslemi, 2012, The frequency and several effective factors on baby blues, HealthMED, 6, 4004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Poromaa, I. S., Comasco, E., Sumner, R. L., & Eileen Luders, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2020.100856 · Cited by 217
O’Dea, G. A., Youssef, G. J., Hagg, L. J., Francis, L. M., Spry, E. A., Rossen, L., Smith, I., Teague, S. J., Mansour, K., Booth, A., et al. (2023) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-023-01332-1 · Cited by 213
Molgora, S., & Accordini, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567155 · Cited by 131
Phenomenology, Epidemiology and Aetiology of Postpartum Psychosis: A Review
Perry, A., Gordon‐Smith, K., Jones, L. A., & Jones, I. R. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11010047 · Cited by 119
Diseases and Complications of the Puerperium
Schrey-Petersen, S., Tauscher, A., Dathan‐Stumpf, A., & Stepan, H. (2021) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0168 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Rezaie-Keikhaie, K., Arbabshastan, M. E., Rafiemanesh, H., Amirshahi, M., Ostadkelayeh, S. M., & Arbabisarjou, A.
- Corresponding author
- Arbabshastan, Mohammad Edris
- Venue
- Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-136
- ISSN
- 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
- 0884-2175
- OpenAlex
- W3004695425
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- maternity blues, postpartum depression, postpartum period, prevalence, postpartum women, risk of bias, maternal health education
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Prevalence, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
