CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154scientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and Information SystemsData Quality and Management

A Systematic Analysis of Duplicate Records in Scopus

Valderrama-Zurián, Juan-Carlos, Aguilar-Moya, Remedios, Melero-Fuentes, David, Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael·2015·Journal of Informetrics
DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scopus includes content from many specialized databases, such as Embase, Compendex, World Textile Index, Fluidex, Geobase, Biobase, and Medline, and their content is integrated and equally accessible.

    “Thus, although Scopus also includes content from many specialized databases, such as Embase, Compendex, World Textile Index, Fluidex, Geobase, Biobase, and Medline [30], their content is integrated and equally accessible.”

    From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C., Aguilar-Moya, R., Melero-Fuentes, D., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R.
Affiliations
Valencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr (ES)
Corresponding author
Melero-Fuentes, David
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Informetrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
570-576
ISSN
1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002
OpenAlex
W2126622095
Cited by
154
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
Keywords
duplicate records, Scopus, bibliographic databases, journal renaming, citation counts, bibliometric analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review