A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

Cites (377)

Items 201–359 of 359

1. Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts
   Filippo Radicchi, Claudio Castellano · 2011 · Journal of Informetrics
2. Accuracy Evaluation of Scopus Author ID Based on the Largest Funding Database in Japan
   Kawashima, Hirotaka, Tomizawa, Hiroyuki · 2015 · Scientometrics
3. Citation analysis of research performer quality
   Ronald Neil Kostoff · 2002 · Scientometrics
4. Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science
   Judit Bar‐Ilan · 2010 · Scientometrics
5. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics
   Mike A Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha · 2015 · El Profesional de la Informacion
6. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web
   Mike A Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha · 2015 · El Profesional de la Informacion
7. Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation databases—Scopus and Web of Science
   Lokman I. Meho, Cassidy R. Sugimoto · 2009 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
8. Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences?
   Anne-Wil K. Harzing · 2012 · Scientometrics
9. The growth of science and database coverage
   Carolin Michels, Ulrich Schmoch · 2012 · Scientometrics
10. Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus
    Daniel Torres‐Salinas, Emilio Delgado López‐Cózar, Evaristo Jiménez‐Contreras · 2009 · Scientometrics
11. Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact
    Mu‐Hsuan Huang, Chi‐Shiou Lin, Dar‐Zen Chen · 2011 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
12. A robust formula to credit authors for their publications
    Frank J. Trueba, H. Guerrero · 2004 · Scientometrics
13. Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors
    Thed N. van Leeuwen, Henk F. Moed · 2005 · Scientometrics
14. Universality of citation distributions revisited
    Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Anthony F. J. van Raan · 2011 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
15. The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count
    Chi‐Shiou Lin, Mu‐Hsuan Huang, Dar‐Zen Chen · 2013 · Journal of Informetrics
16. Multiple Authorship
    D. J. deS. Price · 1981 · Science
17. The Publish or Perish Book
    Nicola De Bellis · 2011 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
18. Where are citations located in the body of scientific articles? A study of the distributions of citation locations
    Zhigang Hu, Chaomei Chen, Zeyuan Liu · 2013 · Journal of Informetrics
19. Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles
    Mike A Thelwall, Ruth Fairclough · 2015 · Journal of Informetrics
20. The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g index
    Michael Schreiber · 2008 · Scientometrics
21. Multidimensional Journal Evaluation
    Stefanie Haustein · 2012 · Saur eBooks
22. The significance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolificacy
    Reinier Plomp · 1990 · Scientometrics
23. Academic Search Engine Spam and Google Scholar's Resilience Against it
    Joeran Beel, Béla Gipp · 2010 · Journal of Electronic Publishing
24. Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation
    Michel Zitt, Suzy Ramanana-Rahary, Elise Bassecoulard · 2003 · Scientometrics
25. Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts
    Filippo Radicchi, Claudio Castellano · 2012 · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
26. In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices
    Xiaojun Hu, Ronald Rousseau, Jin Chen · 2009 · Journal of Information Science
27. Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journals in oncology
    Carmen López-Illescas, Félix de Moya Anegón, Henk F. Moed · 2008 · Journal of Information Science
28. Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods
    Tove Faber Frandsen, Ronald Rousseau · 2004 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
29. Comparison of the effect of mean-based method and z-score for field normalization of citations at the level of Web of Science subject categories
    Zhihui Zhang, Ying Cheng, Nian Cai Liu · 2014 · Scientometrics
30. Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
    Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
31. Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments
    Jiang Li, Mark Sanderson, Peter Willett, Michael W. Norris, Charles Oppenheim · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
32. Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals
    Gaby Haddow, Paul Genoni · 2010 · Scientometrics
33. Errors in DOI Indexing by Bibliometric Databases
    Franceschini, Fiorenzo, Maisano, Domenico, Mastrogiacomo, Luca · 2015 · Scientometrics
34. Google Scholar's Dramatic Coverage Improvement Five Years after Debut
    Xiaotian Chen · 2010 · Serials Review
35. Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor
    Michel Zitt · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
36. Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length
    Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo · 2011 · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
37. Median and percentile impact factors: A set of new indicators
    Ronald Rousseau · 2005 · Scientometrics
38. CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre
    Henk F. Moed · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
39. PageRank-Related Methods for Analyzing Citation Networks
    Ludo Waltman, Erjia Yan · 2014 · Springer eBooks
40. Empirical study of journal impact factors obtained using the classical two-year citation window versus a five-year citation window
    Juan Miguel Campanario · 2010 · Scientometrics
41. Big Macs and Eigenfactor scores: Don't let correlation coefficients fool you
    Jevin D. West, Théodore C. Bergstrom, Carl T. Bergstrom · 2010 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
42. Profit (p)-Index: The Degree to Which Authors Profit from Co-Authors
    N. Ahmad Aziz, Maarten Pieter Rozing · 2013 · PLoS ONE
43. Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields
    Narongrit Sombatsompop, Teerasak Markpin · 2005 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
44. The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach
    Mike A Thelwall · 2016 · Journal of Informetrics
45. The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities
    Peter Ingwersen, Birger Larsen, Ronald Rousseau, Jane Margaret Russell · 2001 · Chinese Science Bulletin
46. The pureh-index: calculating an author’sh- index by taking co-authors into account
    Jin-kun Wan, Ping-huan Hua, Ronald Rousseau · 2007 · Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management
47. A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors
    Michael Schreiber · 2009 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
48. Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship
    Lokman I. Meho, Diane H. Sonnenwald · 2000 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science
49. Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index
    Xuan Zhen Liu, Hui Fang · 2011 · Scientometrics
50. Correlation between the Journal Impact Factor and three other journal citation indices
    Mark Russell Elkins, Christopher Gerard Maher, Rob Herbert, Anne M. Moseley, Catherine Sherrington · 2010 · Scientometrics
51. Publication Credit
    Susan E. Hodge, David A. Greenberg · 1981 · Science
52. The application of characteristic scores and scales to the evaluation and ranking of scientific journals
    Wolfgang Glänzel · 2010 · Journal of Information Science
53. Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of <scp>CWTS</scp> and i<scp>FQ</scp> in comparison to the <scp>W</scp>eb of science
    Olensky, Marlies, Schmidt, Marion, van Eck, Nees Jan · 2016 · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
54. More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons
    Ruth Fairclough, Mike A Thelwall · 2015 · Journal of Informetrics
55. Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS
    Loet Leydesdorff A, Tobias Opthof A · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
56. The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance
    Reinier Plomp · 1994 · Scientometrics
57. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: books and non standard outputs
    Kayvan Kousha, Mike A Thelwall · 2015 · El Profesional de la Informacion
58. Reference standards for citation based assessments
    András P. Schubert, T. Braun · 1993 · Scientometrics
59. Tailor based allocations for multiple authorship: a fractional gh-index
    Serge Galam · 2011 · Scientometrics
60. Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices
    Jian Du, Tang Xiao-li · 2013 · Scientometrics
61. The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach
    Mike A Thelwall · 2016 · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
62. Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy
    Nils T. Hagen · 2013 · Journal of Informetrics
63. The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric meso-indicators. The case of european universities
    Bart Thijs, Wolfgang Glänzel · 2006 · Scientometrics
64. Quantitative evaluation of alternative field normalization procedures
    Yunrong Li, Filippo Radicchi, Claudio Castellano, Javier Ruiz‐Castillo · 2013 · Journal of Informetrics
65. Averages of ratios vs. ratios of averages: An empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation
    Vincent Larivière, Yves Gingras · 2011 · Journal of Informetrics
66. Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of “equal first authors” and corresponding authors
    Xiaojun Hu · 2009 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
67. A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts
    Christoph Neuhaus, Hans‐Dieter Daniel · 2008 · Scientometrics
68. High-Ranked Social Science Journal Articles Can Be Identified from Early Citation Information
    David I. Stern · 2014 · PLoS ONE
69. Gossypol: Effect on Testosterone
    Martin Dym · 1981 · Science
70. Credit where credit’s due: accounting for co-authorship in citation counts
    Richard S.J. Tol · 2011 · Scientometrics
71. Redefining the field of economics: Improving field normalization for the application of bibliometric techniques in the field of economics
    Thed N. van Leeuwen, Clara Calero Medina · 2012 · Research Evaluation
72. Journal influence factors
    Massimo Franceschet · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
73. The standard impact factor as an evaluation tool of science fields and scientific journals
    Ирина Маршакова-Шайкевич · 1996 · Scientometrics
74. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship
    Ash Mohammad Abbas · 2011 · Scientometrics
75. The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual’s research output
    Fiorenzo Franceschini, Maurizio Galetto, Domenico Augusto Maisano, Luca Mastrogiacomo · 2011 · Scientometrics
76. Percentile Rank and Author Superiority Indexes for Evaluating Individual Journal Articles and the Author’s Overall Citation Performance
    A. I. Pudovkin, Eugene Garfield · 2009 · Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management
77. The weight of author self-citations. A fractional approach to self-citation counting
    András P. Schubert, Wolfgang Glänzel, Bart Thijs · 2006 · Scientometrics
78. The case of scientometricians with the “absolute relative” impact indicator
    Péter Vinkler · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
79. NORMALISED IMPACT FACTOR
    B. K. Sen · 1992 · Journal of Documentation
80. Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors
    Istv�n Lukovits, Péter Vinkler · 1995 · Social Indicators Research
81. The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited
    Marek Kosmulski · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
82. Impact maturity times and citation time windows: The 2-year maximum journal impact factor
    P. Dorta-González, M.I. Dorta-González · 2013 · Journal of Informetrics
83. Skewed citation distributions and bias factors: Solutions to two core problems with the journal impact factor
    Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
84. A priori vs. a posteriori normalisation of citation indicators. The case of journal ranking
    Wolfgang Glänzel, András P. Schubert, Bart Thijs, Koenraad Debackere · 2011 · Scientometrics
85. Proceeding papers in journals versus the “regular” journal publications
    Lin Zhang, Wolfgang Glänzel · 2011 · Journal of Informetrics
86. The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments
    Thed N. van Leeuwen, Rodrigo Costas, Clara Calero‐Medina, Martijn S. Visser · 2012 · Scientometrics
87. Earth's Cores
    Stephen G. Brush · 1981 · Science
88. The stability of the h-index
    Monika Rauch Henzinger, Jacob Suñol, Ingmar G. Weber · 2009 · Scientometrics
89. Should we use the mean citations per paper to summarise a journal’s impact or to rank journals in the same field?
    Mike Calver, J. Stuart Bradley · 2009 · Scientometrics
90. Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science
    Carolin Michels, Fu Junying · 2014 · Scientometrics
91. Calibrating the zoom — a test of Zitt’s hypothesis
    Jonathan R. Adams, Karen Gurney, Louise T. Jackson · 2008 · Scientometrics
92. Ten good reasons to use the Eigenfactor™ metrics
    Massimo Franceschet · 2010 · Information Processing & Management
93. A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocation
    Jinseok Kim, Jana Diesner · 2014 · Scientometrics
94. A new author’s productivity index: p-index
    Nicholas Assimakis, Μαρία Αδάμ · 2010 · Scientometrics
95. The effects and their stability of field normalization baseline on relative performance with respect to citation impact: A case study of 20 natural science departments
    Cristian Colliander, Per Ahlgren · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
96. Improving the coverage of social science and humanities researchers' output: The case of the Érudit journal platform
    Vincent Larivière, Benoît Macaluso · 2011 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
97. Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output
    Marek Kosmulski · 2011 · Journal of Informetrics
98. The measurement of low- and high-impact in citation distributions: Technical results
    Pedro Albarrán, Ignacio Ortuño-Ortı́n, Javier Ruiz‐Castillo · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
99. The application of citation-based performance classes to the disciplinary and multidisciplinary assessment in national comparison and institutional research assessment
    Wolfgang Glänzel, Bart Thijs, Koenraad Debackere · 2014 · Scientometrics
100. The “Mendel syndrome” in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists
     Rodrigo Costas, Thed N. van Leeuwen, Anthony F. J. van Raan · 2011 · Scientometrics
101. Impact maturity times and citation time windows: The 2-year maximum journal impact factor
     Pablo Dorta–González, María Isabel Dorta-González · 2013 · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
102. An Analysis of Document Types Published in Journals Related to Physics: Proceeding Papers Recorded in the Science Citation Index Database
     Anne Sigogneau · 2000 · Scientometrics
103. Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias
     Nils T. Hagen · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
104. How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts
     Loet Leydesdorff A, Zhou Ping, Lutz Bornmann · 2012 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
105. Modifying h-index by allocating credit of multi-authored papers whose author names rank based on contribution
     Xuan Zhen Liu, Hui Fang · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
106. Influence of Omitted Citations on the Bibliometric Statistics of the Major Manufacturing Journals
     Franceschini, Fiorenzo, Maisano, Domenico, Mastrogiacomo, Luca · 2015 · Scientometrics
107. Author credit‐assignment schemas: A comparison and analysis
     Jian Xu, Ying Ding, Min Song, Tamy Chambers · 2015 · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
108. Journal topic citation potential and between-field comparisons: The topic normalized impact factor
     Pablo Dorta–González, María Isabel Dorta-González, Dolores Rosa Santos Peñate, Rafael Suárez‐Vega · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
109. A novel approach for estimating the omitted‐citation rate of bibliometric databases with an application to the field of bibliometrics
     Fiorenzo Franceschini, Domenico Augusto Maisano, Luca Mastrogiacomo · 2013 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
110. The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators
     Rosa, José Maria Silva · 2011 · Library Management
111. Scientific journal publishers and omitted citations in bibliometric databases: Any relationship?
     Fiorenzo Franceschini, Domenico Augusto Maisano, Luca Mastrogiacomo · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
112. The efficiency of self-citations in economics
     Marshall H. Medoff · 2006 · Scientometrics
113. Field‐normalized impact factors ( IFs ): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs
     Loet Leydesdorff A, Filippo Radicchi, Lutz Bornmann, Claudio Castellano, Wouter de Nooy · 2013 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
114. Do Scopus and WoS Correct “Old” Omitted Citations?
     Franceschini, Fiorenzo, Maisano, Domenico, Mastrogiacomo, Luca · 2016 · Scientometrics
115. Rethinking the comparison of coauthorship credit allocation schemes
     Jinseok Kim, Jinmo Kim · 2015 · Journal of Informetrics
116. Validation of citation analysis
     Eugene Garfield · 1997 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science
117. Review of the indirect citations paradigm: theory and practice of the assessment of papers, authors and journals
     Eleni Fragkiadaki, Georgios Evangelidis · 2013 · Scientometrics
118. WL ‐index: Leveraging citation mention number to quantify an individual's scientific impact
     Xiaojun Wan, Fang Liu · 2014 · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
119. The Reference Return Ratio
     Jeppe Nicolaisen, Tove Faber Frandsen · 2008 · Journal of Informetrics
120. Citation Counts of Multi-Authored Papers — First-named Authors and Further Authors
     Lydia L. Lange · 2001 · Scientometrics
121. A sensitivity analysis of researchers’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation
     Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
122. Fractionalized counting of publications for the g‐Index
     Michael Schreiber · 2009 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
123. Insights into the relationship between the h‐index and self‐citations
     Ernesto Gianoli, Marco A. Molina‐Montenegro · 2009 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
124. Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators
     Neus Herranz, Javier Ruiz‐Castillo · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
125. Strange attractors in the Web of Science database
     Miguel Ángel García-Pérez · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
126. High-end performance or outlier? Evaluating the tail of scientometric distributions
     Wolfgang Glänzel · 2013 · Scientometrics
127. How to modify the g-index for multi-authored manuscripts
     Michael Schreiber · 2009 · Journal of Informetrics
128. Probing the effect of author self-citations on h index: A case study of environmental engineering
     Mu‐Hsuan Huang, Wen‐Yau Cathy Lin · 2011 · Journal of Information Science
129. The evaluation of scientific production: Towards a neutral impact factor
     José María Gómez Sancho, María Jesús Mancebón Torrubia · 2009 · Scientometrics
130. An Integrated Impact Indicator: A new definition of 'Impact' with policy relevance
     Caroline S. Wagner, Loet Leydesdorff A · 2012 · Research Evaluation
131. Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions
     Henk F. Moed · 2015 · Scientometrics
132. Partition-based Field Normalization: An approach to highly specialized publication records
     Nadine Rons · 2011 · Journal of Informetrics
133. A novel approach to citation normalization: A similarity‐based method for creating reference sets
     Cristian Colliander · 2014 · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
134. Finding the Easter eggs hidden by oneself: Why Radicchi and Castellano's (2012) fairness test for citation indicators is not fair
     Daniel Sirtes · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
135. Multiplicative versus fractional counting methods for co-authored publications. The case of the 500 universities in the Leiden Ranking
     Antonio Perianes‐Rodríguez, Javier Ruiz‐Castillo · 2015 · Journal of Informetrics
136. How much do different ways of calculating percentiles influence the derived performance indicators? A case study
     Michael Schreiber · 2013 · Scientometrics
137. The pragmatics of a diachronic journal impact factor
     Peter Ingwersen · 2012 · Scientometrics
138. Sub-field normalization of the IEEE scientific journals based on their connection with Technical Societies
     Fiorenzo Franceschini, Domenico Augusto Maisano · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
139. Is citation normalization realistic?
     Ronald Neil Kostoff, Wendy L. Martinez · 2004 · Journal of Information Science
140. Reversing the byline hierarchy: The effect of equalizing bias on the accreditation of primary, secondary and senior authors
     Nils T. Hagen · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
141. Measuring national output in physics: Delimitation problems
     Ed J. Rinia, C. De Lange, Henk F. Moed · 1993 · Scientometrics
142. The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factors
     Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐Dieter Daniel · 2012 · Scientometrics
143. Problems with the SNIP indicator
     John Mingers · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
144. Editorial
     Tibor Braun · 2012 · Scientometrics
145. Expected number of citations and the crown indicator
     Lawrence Smolinsky · 2015 · Journal of Informetrics
146. Effects of the durability of scientific literature at the group level: Case study of chemistry research groups in the Netherlands
     Rodrigo Costas, Thed N. van Leeuwen, Anthony F. J. van Raan · 2012 · Research Policy
147. Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database
     Teerasak Markpin, B. Boonradsamee, K. Ruksinsut, Wutthisit Yochai, Nongyao Premkamolnetr, Preeyanuch Ratchatahirun, Narongrit Sombatsompop · 2008 · Scientometrics
148. How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations?
     Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
149. The comparison of classification-system-based normalization procedures with source normalization alternatives in Waltman and Van Eck (2013)
     Javier Ruiz‐Castillo · 2013 · Journal of Informetrics
150. A case study of the modified g index: Counting multi-author publications fractionally
     Michael Schreiber · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
151. Classification of 'research letters' in general medical journals and its consequences in bibliometric research evaluation processes
     Thed N. van Leeuwen, L J van der Wurff, Anton J.M. de Craen · 2007 · Research Evaluation
152. Do Article Influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines?
     William H. Walters · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
153. A sensitivity analysis of research institutions’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation
     Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
154. The journal relative impact: an indicator for journal assessment
     Elizabeth S. Vieira, José A. N. F. Gomes · 2011 · Scientometrics
155. Calibration of bibliometric indicators in space exploration research: a comparison of citation impact measurement of the space and ground-based life and physical sciences
     A. J. Nederhof, Thed N. van Leeuwen, Paul Clancy · 2012 · Research Evaluation
156. Contributory inequality alters assessment of academic output gap between comparable countries
     Nils T. Hagen · 2015 · Journal of Informetrics
157. Enhanced self‐citation detection by fuzzy author name matching and complementary error estimates
     Paul Donner · 2014 · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
158. New insights into the relationship between the h‐index and self‐citations?
     Leif Engqvist, Joachim G. Frommen · 2010 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
159. Untitled work
     1994 · 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1