Cited by 143scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of author-selected keywords on citation counts

Uddin, Shahadat, Khan, Arif·2016·Journal of Informetrics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.004

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 58 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–143 of 143

Metadata

Authors
Uddin, S., & Khan, A.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Uddin, Shahadat
Venue
Journal of Informetrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
1166-1177
ISSN
1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2538658056
Cited by
143
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
citation counts, keyword co-occurrence network, network centrality, degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review