Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting

Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484

Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents

Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345

The structure of scientific collaboration networks

Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · Cited by 4,550

Visualizing Bibliometric Networks

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 · Cited by 3,884

Networks of Scientific Papers

Price, D. J. D. S. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510 · Cited by 3,205

Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers

Kessler, M. M. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · Cited by 3,122

Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality

Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016132 · Cited by 2,631

Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results

Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016131 · Cited by 2,094

Visualizing knowledge domains

Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106 · Cited by 1,930

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356

Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure

White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630320302 · Cited by 1,232

Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview

McCain, K. W. (1990) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199009)41:6 · Cited by 987

How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures

Eck, N. J. V., & Waltman, L. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21075 · Cited by 966

Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient

Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10242 · Cited by 799

Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?

Cronin, B. (2001) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.1097 · Cited by 500

The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

Waltman, L., Calero‐Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E., Tijssen, R., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., van Raan, A. F. J., Visser, M. S., & Wouters, P. F. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22708 · Cited by 452

Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice

Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (2014) · Cited by 335

Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method

Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.001 · Cited by 297

Clustering thescience citation index ® using co-citations

Small, H., & Sweeney, E. (1985) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02017157 · Cited by 288

Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic‐coupling analysis

Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20910 · Cited by 264

A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level

Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02093621 · Cited by 211

Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks

Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02291-3 · Cited by 208

On bibliographic networks

Batagelj, V., & Cerinšek, M. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0940-1 · Cited by 186

Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science

Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2005) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20274 · Cited by 175

Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks

Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.2200/s00624ed1v01y201501icr039 · Cited by 137

Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods

Aksnes, D. W., Schneider, J. W., & Gunnarsson, M. (2011) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.002 · Cited by 125

Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research

Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., Roulin-Perriard, A., & von Ins, M. (2007) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1800-2 · Cited by 95

All author citations versus first author citations

Persson, O. (2001) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1010534009428 · Cited by 87

Towards all-author co-citation analysis

Zhao, D. (2006) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.022 · Cited by 84

The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: the government stimulation programs of China and Korea

Park, H. W., Yoon, J., & Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1978-2 · Cited by 68

Identifying research themes with weighted direct citation links

Persson, O. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.006 · Cited by 67

Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of information science

Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.004 · Cited by 67

Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · doi:10.1002/asi.20872 · Cited by 66

A classification of author co‐citations: Definitions and search strategies

Rousseau, R., & Zuccala, A. (2004) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10401 · Cited by 62

Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field

Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21495 · Cited by 48

A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications

Sen, S., & Gan, S. K. (1983) · Cited by 42

Network Analysis and Indicators

Milojević, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_3 · Cited by 30

Network analysis of Zentralblatt MATH data

Cerinšek, M., & Batagelj, V. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1419-z · Cited by 10

Untitled work

(1994) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1

Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review

Ubando, A. T., Felix, C. B., & Chen, W. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122585 · Cited by 922

AI in marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda

Mariani, M. M., Perez‐Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21619 · Cited by 631

Role of Digital Transformation for Achieving Sustainability: Mediated Role of Stakeholders, Key Capabilities, and Technology

Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A. M., Manrique, S. I. R., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Félix, R. A., & Mena, L. J. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151411221 · Cited by 826

Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead

Ferasso, M., Beliaeva, T., Kraus, S., Clauss, T., & Ribeiro‐Soriano, D. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2554 · Cited by 588

Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields

Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2017) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y · Cited by 506

Full and Fractional Counting in Bibliometric NetworksPreprint

Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Park, H. W. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.06943 · Cited by 2

Building Character Strengths through “new Islamic education” in Facing Era Society 5.0: Bibliometric reviews

Elihami, E., Safrina, K., Mashar, R., & Murcahyanto, H. (n.d.) · Selamat Datang di Repository UAD (Universitas Ahmad Dahlan)

Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method

Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.001 · Cited by 297

On fractional approach to analysis of linked networks

Batagelj, V. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03383-y · Cited by 33

Multiplicative versus fractional counting methods for co-authored publications. The case of the 500 universities in the Leiden Ranking

Perianes‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruiz‐Castillo, J. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.002 · Cited by 19