The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To avoid assigning higher weights to manuscripts with a higher number of authors, we chose a fractional counting method to build a weighted co-authorship network (i.e., edge weights are inversely proportional to the number of authors) based on the recom mended methods by Perianes-Rodriguez et al. (2016).”
From Charting the Evolution and Future of Conversational Agents: A Research Agenda Along Five Waves and New Frontiers (2024) · cites this paper as Perianes-Rodriguez et al. (2016)
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Self-citationCo‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
The structure of scientific collaboration networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · Cited by 4,550
Visualizing Bibliometric Networks
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 · Cited by 3,884
Self-citationPrice, D. J. D. S. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510 · Cited by 3,205
Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers
Kessler, M. M. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · Cited by 3,122
Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016132 · Cited by 2,631
Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016131 · Cited by 2,094
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106 · Cited by 1,930
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review
Ubando, A. T., Felix, C. B., & Chen, W. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122585 · Cited by 922
Mariani, M. M., Perez‐Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21619 · Cited by 631
Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A. M., Manrique, S. I. R., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Félix, R. A., & Mena, L. J. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151411221 · Cited by 826
Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead
Ferasso, M., Beliaeva, T., Kraus, S., Clauss, T., & Ribeiro‐Soriano, D. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2554 · Cited by 588
Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields
Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2017) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- ORCID
- Waltman, Ludo
- Venue
- Journal of Informetrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1178-1195
- ISSN
- 1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2486654687
- Cited by
- 1,416
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 170 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 230 · 2023: 224 · 2022: 229 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 32.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte
- Universiteit Leiden (CAS15/00178)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- bibliometric networks, fractional counting, co-authorship networks, bibliographic coupling, co-citation networks, network construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
