Cited by 33scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Citation Success Index − An Intuitive Pair-Wise Journal Comparison Metric

Open access
Milojević, Staša, Radicchi, Filippo, Bar-Ilan, Judit·2017·Journal of Informetrics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joi.2016.12.006

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Milojević, S., Radicchi, F., & Bar-Ilan, J.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Milojević, Staša
Venue
Journal of Informetrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
223-231
ISSN
1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2565824534
Cited by
33
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
NSF (SMA-1446078)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
journal impact factor, journal comparison, citation distribution, highly cited papers, citation metrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review