Citation Success Index − An Intuitive Pair-Wise Journal Comparison Metric
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Values of mean-based indicators can be highly distorted by the presence of a few highly cited publications.
“the values of mean-based indicators can be highly distorted by the presence of few highly cited publications [44,45,221,224,277-279].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [279]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669 · see citing works
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/520429a · Cited by 2,828 · see citing works
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The IF is a metric introduced by Eugene Garfield in 1972 (Garfield, 1972), and its definition is rather simple.”
BackgroundThe History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770 · see citing works
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447 · see citing works
How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution
Redner, S. (1998) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1007/s100510050359 · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Moed, H. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3714-7 · Cited by 1,334 · see citing works
Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems.
Lyon, A., & Ravetz, J. R. (1973) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2218013 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806977105 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Self-citationJournal impact measures in bibliometric research
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1014848323806 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use—A Literature Review
Rijcke, S. D., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv038 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Psychological relevance and information science
Harter, S. P. (1992) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199210)43:9 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences
Archambault, É., & Larivière, V. (2009) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Differences in impact factor across fields and over time
Althouse, B. M., West, J. D., Bergstrom, C. T., & Bergstrom, T. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20936 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics
Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21232 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Moed, H., & van Leeuwen, T. V. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381186a0 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributionsPreprint
Larivière, V., Kiermer, V., MacCallum, C. J., Mcnutt, M. K., Patterson, M., Pulverer, B., Swaminathan, S., Taylor, S., & Curry, S. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/062109 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information
Stringer, M. J., Sales‐Pardo, M., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001683 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics
Bornmann, L., Marx, W., Gasparyan, A. Y., & Kitas, G. D. (2011) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-011-2276-1 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Journal Evaluation: Technical and Practical Issues
Rousseau, R. (2002) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Weale, A. R., Bailey, M., & Lear, P. A. (2004) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-14 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns
Calcagno, V., Demoinet, É., Gollner, K., Guidi, L., Ruths, D. A., & de Mazancourt, C. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1227833 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Rushforth, A., & de Rijcke, S. (2015) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-015-9274-5 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
The Journal Impact Factor Denominator
McVeigh, M., & Mann, S. J. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1301 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Power law distributions in information science: Making the case for logarithmic binning
Milojević, S. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21426 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards appropriate indicators of journal impact
Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Reedijk, J. (1999) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02459613 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications
Schubert, A. P., & Glänzel, W. (1983) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02097178 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Verma, I. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509912112 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
The Citation: From Culture to Infrastructure
Wouters, P. F. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9445.003.0006 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Multidimensional Journal Evaluation
Haustein, S. (2012) · Saur eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110255553 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Is scientists' publishing behaviour rewardseeking?
Luukkonen, T. (1992) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02017913 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
How Authors Select Journals: A Test of the Reward Maximization Model of Submission Behaviour
Gordon, M. D. (1984) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631284014001003 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias
Perneger, T. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.012 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective
Thelwall, M. A. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0669-x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Milojević, S. (2015) · Soziale Welt · doi:10.5771/0038-6073-2015-2-193 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationRankings of information and library science journals by JIF and by h-type indices
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.006 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationInteractions between journal attributes and authors' willingness to wait for editorial decisions
Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22637 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Shanahan, D. R. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1887 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0671-3 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwarzenbach, D., Kostorz, G., McMahon, B. T., et al. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0108767310041504 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
Evaluating Research and Researchers by the Journal Impact Factor: Is It Better than Coin Flipping?
Brito, R., & Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2019) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.009 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Milojević, S., Radicchi, F., & Bar-Ilan, J.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Milojević, Staša
- ORCID
- Radicchi, Filippo
- Venue
- Journal of Informetrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 223-231
- ISSN
- 1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2565824534
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- NSF (SMA-1446078)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- journal impact factor, journal comparison, citation distribution, highly cited papers, citation metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review