Cited by 19scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetrics

The Negative Effects of Citing with a National Orientation in Terms of Recognition: National and International Citations in Natural-Sciences Papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK

Open access
Bornmann, Lutz, Adams, Jonathan, Leydesdorff, Loet·2018·Journal of Informetrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.009

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies are often targeted at general public and published in national language, which narrows potential audience and reduces likelihood of citation.

    “These studies are also often targeted at the general public and, therefore, are often published in the national language, which narrows the size of potential audience and, consequently, reduces the likelihood of citation [87,96,260,265,294].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bornmann, L., Adams, J., & Leydesdorff, L.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bornmann, Lutz
Venue
Journal of Informetrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
931-949
ISSN
1751-1577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884061206
Cited by
19
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Informetrics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
citation patterns, international citations, highly cited papers, co-authorship, research recognition, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review