The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation
Abstract
A supply base is defined as the portion of a supply network that is actively managed by a buying company. The buying company, referred to as the focal company, manages the suppliers in the supply base through contracts and purchasing of parts, materials, and services. To facilitate better management of a supply base, we observe “complexity” as a key area of managerial consideration and apply the literature on complexity to the supply base. Supply base complexity is conceptualized in three dimensions: (1) the number of suppliers in the supply base, (2) the degree of differentiation among these suppliers, and (3) the level of inter‐relationships among the suppliers. Four propositions have been formulated in terms of four major areas of research within supply chain management—transaction costs, supply risk, supplier responsiveness, and supplier innovation. Corollary propositions are also stated. Although a reduction in complexity may lead to lower transaction costs and increased supplier responsiveness, in certain circumstances it may also increase supply risk and reduce supplier innovation. Therefore, reducing supply base complexity in general may be a cost‐efficient approach, but blindly reducing it may potentially decrease the buying company's overall competitiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a Theory of Multi‐Tier Supply Chain Management
Mena, C., Humphries, A., & Choi, T. Y. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12003 · Cited by 483
Self-citationSUPPLY CHAIN PROCESS INTEGRATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., & Landry, T. D. (2009) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00110.x · Cited by 317
Challenges for global supply chain sustainability: evidence from conflict minerals reports
Kim, Y. H., & Davis, G. F. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0770 · Cited by 293
Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation
Macdonald, J. R., Zobel, C. W., Melnyk, S. A., & Griffis, S. E. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787 · Cited by 214
Shin, H., Lee, J.-N., Kim, D., & Rhim, H. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.015 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-652
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2055397528
- Cited by
- 1,088
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2005.07.002
- The paper
- Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.