The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains
Abstract
Rivalry is increasingly being contested at the supply chain level of analysis. Rather than competing “firm versus firm,” today's organizations are battling “supply chain versus supply chain.” Within this context, best value supply chains are emerging as a means to create competitive advantages and superior performance. While traditional supply chains often focus primarily on one key outcome such as speed or cost, best value supply chains excel along an array of uniquely integrated priorities—cost, quality, speed, and flexibility. We describe how key organizational theories help to distinguish traditional supply chains from best value supply chains. To provide a foundation for future inquiry, we offer theory‐based research questions that are focused on best value supply chains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/20159575 · Cited by 813
Self-citation
Cited by
Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018 · Cited by 863
Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., & Popp, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103491 · Cited by 710
Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.970707 · Cited by 581
Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework
Govindan, K. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.003 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Ketchen, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-16
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 573-580
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2146614620
- Cited by
- 858
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.010
- The paper
- Ketchen, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
