The role of quality in e‐procurement performance: An empirical analysis
Abstract
While the adoption and use of e‐procurement has been prevalent in supply chain management, there is very little research examining the critical role of quality in this context. e‐Procurement promises to cut operational costs all across the supply chain, but it also raises the expectations of buyers posing a challenge for buyer satisfaction and supply chain performance. Using the theoretical lens of Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Resource‐Based View, we postulate that online information and process act as resources that result in logistics fulfillment capabilities. These capabilities in turn lead to satisfaction with e‐procurement. We estimate our research model using structural equation modeling with survey data collected from 131 purchasing and procurement managers. We empirically examine these linkages by analyzing data collected from procurement managers. Our results indicate strong support for the relationships between information flow process quality, logistics fulfillment quality processes, and e‐procurement satisfaction performance. One of the surprising findings of our study is that fulfilled order timeliness has a significantly greater impact on satisfaction than fulfilled order accuracy. This finding points to the increasingly important role that the dimension of time plays in today's competitive environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector
Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.008 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
Brandon-Jones, A., & Kauppi, K. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0346 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
What is the value of an IT e-procurement system?
Ronchi, S., Brun, A., Golini, R., & Fan, X. (2010) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2010.03.013 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Ramkumar, M., Schoenherr, T., Wagner, S. M., & Jenamani, M. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.003 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis
Toktaş-Palut, P., Baylav, E., Teoman, S., & Altunbey, M. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.017 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Singh, P. K., & Chan, S. W. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8020061 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“performances have been studied by [81].”
BackgroundResultMasudin, I., Aprilia, G. D., Nugraha, A., & Restuputri, D. P. (2021) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics5010016 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Vaidyanathan and Devaraj [38] found that the quality of the information flow process, the logistics fulfillment process, and e-procurement satisfaction have a strong relationship.”
BackgroundAn Empirical Evaluation Of The Potential Of Public E-Procurement To Reduce Corruption
Neupane, A., Soar, J., & Vaidya, K. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v18i2.780 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
From Public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; A Critical Literature Review
Mavidis, A., & Folinas, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811252 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A Success Model for the Malaysian Government e-Procurement System: The Buyer Perspective
Kassim, E. S., & Hussin, H. (2013) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2013010101 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Positive and negative impacts of the adoption of e-procurement solutions: the Italian market case
Belisari, S., Appolloni, A., & Cerruti, C. (2019) · International Journal of Procurement Management · doi:10.1504/ijpm.2019.098553 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vaidyanathan, G., & Devaraj, S.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University South Bend (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vaidyanathan, Ganesh
- ORCID
- Devaraj, Sarv
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-30
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-425
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W1972041372
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Operations Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › E-commerce and Technology Innovations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- e-procurement, quality, purchase satisfaction, supply chain performance, dynamic capabilities theory, resource-based view, order accuracy, purchasing managers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review