CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,518Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training

Open access
Sarkis, Joseph, Gonzalez‐Torre, Pilar, Adenso‐Diaz, Belarmino·2010·Journal of Operations Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The influence of stakeholder pressure on the adoption of environmental practices has been established in the literature. In this paper we posit that these direct effects are further mediated, causally, by the level of training in companies. Theoretically, this relationship is supported by the relationship between institutional theory (stakeholder pressure) and the dimensions of dynamic capabilities in resource‐based theory. We investigate this relationship within the Spanish automotive industry. The theoretical contribution of this paper focuses on further supporting the relationship between stakeholder and resource‐based theory as complementary theoretical frameworks. The practical implications focus on whether or not training should be integrated in order to help in the adoption of particular environmental practices, which in this study are represented by environmentally oriented reverse logistics practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dawes J., 1998, 27th EMAC Conference, vol. 5, 461
  2. Goldstein H.B., 2007, Shareholders beware! When individual shareholders may be left holding the bag for environmental liability, Journal of Taxation of Investments, 24, 226
  3. Keldmann T., 1994, Conditions for handling the environmental issue as a business issue in product development, Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing, 3, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B.
Affiliations
Clark University (US)
ORCID
Sarkis, Joseph
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-16
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
163-176
ISSN
  • 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1317
DOI
10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001
OpenAlex
W2044265223
Cited by
1,518
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 42
FWCI
63.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Operations Management (publishedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MEC-DPI2007-65827-C02-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
stakeholder pressure, environmental practices, employee training, mediating effect, institutional theory, resource-based view, dynamic capabilities, reverse logistics, automotive industry, green supply chain management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review