Cited by 16Auction Theory and ApplicationsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourUsability and User Interface Design

User acceptance of complex electronic market mechanisms: Role of information feedback

Adomavicius, Gediminas, Curley, Shawn P., Gupta, Alok, Sanyal, Pallab·2013·Journal of Operations Management

Abstract

This paper broadens the scope of evaluating the design of economic mechanisms that is traditionally done solely from an economic perspective. We introduce and demonstrate the application of acceptability to evaluate complex economic mechanisms. In particular, we apply our approach to the evaluation of continuous combinatorial auctions, which represent a complex, sophisticated market mechanism that has not been generally available in the online marketplace but has the potential to enhance the economic efficiency of trade for assets with interdependent values. Such auctions are being increasingly used in industry, e.g., to procure logistical services. Intuitively, acceptance and usage of a complex mechanism can be fostered by a design that provides information and tools that meet the users’ task demands. Based on prior research and an analysis of the auction tasks, we discuss practical and innovative information feedback schemes for reducing the cognitive burden of formulating bids in combinatorial auctions. Then, we use constructs from the technology acceptance model (TAM) – which have been consistently shown to be key determinants of technology acceptance in the extant literature – to compare the acceptability of the mechanism under three different information regimes. In addition, we borrow constructs from marketing theory to assess the potential growth in adoption of the mechanism. We compare user perceptions of the three alternative designs in a laboratory experiment with…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.015

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adomavicius et al. (2013) apply the TAM for evaluating decision aids for an economic mechanism in combinatorial auctions, but their test subjects are students rather than actual e-procurement users.

    “Adomavicius et al. (2013) apply the TAM for evaluating decision aids for an economic mechanism in combinatorial auctions, but while their study is at the individual level, the test subjects are students rather than actual e-procurement users.”

    From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Adomavicius et al. (2013)

  • System characteristics have a significant impact on individuals' perceptions of system usefulness and ease of use.

    “Overall these results are in line with Adomavicius et al. (2013) who find that system characteristics have a significant impact on individual's perceptions of system usefulness and ease of use.”

    From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Adomavicius et al. (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adomavicius, G., Curley, S. P., Gupta, A., & Sanyal, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
489-503
ISSN
  • 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1317
OpenAlex
W2075037291
Cited by
16
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Operations Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
user acceptance, information feedback, technology acceptance model, mechanism design, technology adoption, online marketplaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review