The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medical Rapid Prototyping Technologies: State of the Art and Current Limitations for Application in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE We describe state-of-the-art software and hardware requirements for the manufacture of high quality medical models manufactured using medical rapid prototyping. The limitations of medical models, the source of artefacts, and their physical appearance are illustrated along with remedies for their removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical models were built using predominantly stereolithography and fused deposition modeling at both institutions over a period of 6 years. A combined total of 350 models have been produced for a range of maxillofacial, neurosurgical, and orthopedic applications. Stereolithography, fused deposition modeling, computerized numerical milling, and other technologies are described along with computer software requirements. RESULTS A range of unwanted artefacts that create distortions on medical models have been identified. These include data import, computed tomography gantry distortion, metal, motion, surface roughness due to support structure removal or surface modeling, and image data thresholding. The source of the artefact has been related to the patient, imaging modality performance, or the modeling technology. Discussion as to the significance of the artefacts on clinical use is provided. CONCLUSIONS It is recommended that models of human anatomy generated by medical rapid prototyping are subject to rigorous quality assurance at all stages of the manufacturing process. Clinicians should be aware of potential areas for inaccuracies within models and review the source images in cases where model integrity is in doubt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Müller, H., Michoux, N., Bandon, D., & Geissbuhler, A. (2004) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.11.024 · Cited by 1,489
Gebhardt, A. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/10877768_4 · Cited by 461
Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial
D'Urso, P. S., Barker, T. M., Earwaker, W. J., Bruce, L. J., Atkinson, R. L., Lanigan, M. W., Arvier, J. F., & Effeney, D. J. (1999) · Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/s1010-5182(99)80007-9 · Cited by 276
A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector
Webb, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology · doi:10.1080/03091900050163427 · Cited by 276
Mahnken, A. H., Raupach, R., Wildberger, J. E., Jung, B., Heussen, N., Flohr, T. G., Günther, R. W., & Schaller, S. (2003) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54 · Cited by 227
Medical rapid prototyping and 3D CT in the manufacture of custom made cranial titanium plates
Winder, J. R., Cooke, R. S., Gray, J., et al. (1999) · Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology · doi:10.1080/030919099294401 · Cited by 139
Self-citationTechnical advances in multi–slice spiral CT
Fuchs, T. O. J., Kachelrieß, M., & Kalender, W. A. (2000) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00269-2 · Cited by 136
Sailer, H. F., Haers, P. E. J. J., Zollikofer, C. P. E., Warnke, T., Caris, F. R., & Stucki, P. (1998) · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(98)80059-3 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials
Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 · Cited by 1,734
Selective laser sintering in biomedical engineering
Mazzoli, A. (2013) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-012-1001-x · Cited by 469
What are you printing? Ambivalent emancipation by 3D printing
Bosqué, C. (2015) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-09-2014-0128 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Winder, J., & Bibb, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1006-1015
- ISSN
- 0278-2391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086590234
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Rapid Prototyping Technologies: State of the Art and Current Limitations for Application in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016
- The paper
- Winder, J., & Bibb, R. (2005). Medical Rapid Prototyping Technologies: State of the Art and Current Limitations for Application in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.