Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New Algorithm for Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation After Total Hip Replacement

Mahnken, Andreas H., Raupach, Rainer, Wildberger, Joachim E., Jung, Bettina, Heussen, Nicole, Flohr, Thomas G., Günther, Rolf W., Schaller, Stefan·2003·Investigative Radiology

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a newly developed algorithm for metal artifact reduction (MAR) in Computed Tomography (CT). METHODS: A projection interpolation algorithm for MAR with threshold-based metal segmentation was developed. First, the algorithm was tested with a simulated hip phantom. On demand, the presence of metallic inserts was simulated, representing total hip endoprostheses. Second, CT data of 20 patient with total hip endoprosthesis were reconstructed with and without application of the MAR algorithm. Image quality was independently assessed by 2 experienced radiologists using a qualitative score. The results of the in vitro study were evaluated with the Student's t test. Results of the in vivo study were analyzed using a repeated-measure analysis of variance. RESULTS: Applying the MAR algorithm the phantom study showed no significant difference between images with and without simulated metal contributions. The patient study revealed improved image quality using the MAR algorithm. Results were statistically significant for fat (P=0.0097), vessels (P=0.0091), and bone (P=0.0005). Improvement of the image quality for muscle was not statistically significant (P=0.0287). CONCLUSIONS: A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction was successfully introduced into clinical routine. The algorithm led to a robust reduction of metal artifacts. The MAR algorithm may serve for an improvement in image quality in patients with metallic implants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Mahnken, A. H., Raupach, R., Wildberger, J. E., Jung, B., Heussen, N., Flohr, T. G., Günther, R. W., & Schaller, S.
Venue
Investigative Radiology
Published
2003-12
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
769-775
ISSN
0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042580235
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Algorithm for Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation After Total Hip Replacement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54
The paper
Mahnken, A. H., Raupach, R., Wildberger, J. E., Jung, B., Heussen, N., Flohr, T. G., Günther, R. W., & Schaller, S. (2003). A New Algorithm for Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation After Total Hip Replacement. Investigative Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.