The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Algorithm for Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation After Total Hip Replacement
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a newly developed algorithm for metal artifact reduction (MAR) in Computed Tomography (CT). METHODS: A projection interpolation algorithm for MAR with threshold-based metal segmentation was developed. First, the algorithm was tested with a simulated hip phantom. On demand, the presence of metallic inserts was simulated, representing total hip endoprostheses. Second, CT data of 20 patient with total hip endoprosthesis were reconstructed with and without application of the MAR algorithm. Image quality was independently assessed by 2 experienced radiologists using a qualitative score. The results of the in vitro study were evaluated with the Student's t test. Results of the in vivo study were analyzed using a repeated-measure analysis of variance. RESULTS: Applying the MAR algorithm the phantom study showed no significant difference between images with and without simulated metal contributions. The patient study revealed improved image quality using the MAR algorithm. Results were statistically significant for fat (P=0.0097), vessels (P=0.0091), and bone (P=0.0005). Improvement of the image quality for muscle was not statistically significant (P=0.0287). CONCLUSIONS: A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction was successfully introduced into clinical routine. The algorithm led to a robust reduction of metal artifacts. The MAR algorithm may serve for an improvement in image quality in patients with metallic implants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polychromatic Streak Artifacts in Computed Tomography Images
Duerinckx, A. J., & Macovski, A. (1978) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-197809000-00020 · Cited by 72
Cited by
Winder, J., & Bibb, R. (2005) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016 · Cited by 411
Dual-Energy CT for the Musculoskeletal System
Mallinson, P. I., Coupal, T. M., McLaughlin, P. D., Nicolaou, S., Munk, P. L., & Ouellette, H. A. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2016151109 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahnken, A. H., Raupach, R., Wildberger, J. E., Jung, B., Heussen, N., Flohr, T. G., Günther, R. W., & Schaller, S.
- Venue
- Investigative Radiology
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 769-775
- ISSN
- 0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042580235
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Algorithm for Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation After Total Hip Replacement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54
- The paper
- Mahnken, A. H., Raupach, R., Wildberger, J. E., Jung, B., Heussen, N., Flohr, T. G., Günther, R. W., & Schaller, S. (2003). A New Algorithm for Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation After Total Hip Replacement. Investigative Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.