The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delayed Ear Reconstruction: Case Report of Reconstruction of an Avulsed Ear 2 Days After Injury
Abstract
Auricular reattachment and reconstruction following traumatic ear avulsion is a challenging surgical problem. Suggested reconstruction methods include direct reattachment, composite grafting, pocket methods, coverage with periauricular flaps, and microsurgical repair. A published alternative is reattachment and burial of the amputated part under a postauricular flap. If circumstances delay the surgical intervention, what is a safe window to still consider this form of treatment? In the current report, we present a case of a complete partial ear avulsion, which was reattached in the ER as a free graft. Two days later the cartilage was banked under a postauricular flap. A 22 year-old male had his ear was completely bitten off which was re-attached. Two days later the skin of the avulsed segment was dark and bloodless. The avulsed segment was removed from the ear. The overlying skin was dissected off of the attached ear leaving perichondrium on the medial aspect of the ear. The cartilage was then reattached. A postauricular pocket/flap was created and the ear tucked and secured to the postauricular fascia and skin closed overtop. Five weeks later, the patient had division and inset of the flap with a full thickness skin graft to the posterior aspect of the ear. Our results and experiences suggest that immediate reconstruction may not be crucial.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All reported cases of complete ear avulsion, but one, survived and showed a complete recovery.
“All reported cases of CEA, but one[29] survived and showed a complete recovery.”
From Auricular avulsion injuries (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
THE POCKET PRINCIPLE: A New Technique for the Reattachment of a Severed Ear Part
MLADICK, R. A., HORTON, C. E., ADAMSON, J. E., & COHEN, B. I. (1971) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-197109000-00004 · Cited by 100
Reconstruction of a subtotally amputated auricle: A case report
Yotsuyanagi, K. Y. (2001) · Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery · doi:10.1080/028443101317149408 · Cited by 14
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Jung, 2013, A review of microvascular ear replantation, J Reconstr Microsurg, 29, 181, 10.1055/s-0032-1331150 · DOI
- Steffen, 2006, A comparison of ear reattachment methods: A review of 25 years since Pennington, Plast Reconstr Surg, 118, 1358, 10.1097/01.prs.0000239539.98956.b0 · DOI · Paper page
- Safak, 1998, A traumatic ear amputation attached with a narrow pedicle, Ann Plast Surg, 40, 106, 10.1097/00000637-199801000-00028 · DOI · Paper page
- Ozcelik, 2009, Subtotal ear amputation with a very narrow pedicle: A case report and review of the literature, Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 15, 306
- Alexander, 2011, A morphometric study of the human ear, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 64, 41, 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.005 · DOI
- Shelley, 2000, Successful partial ear replantation after prolonged ischaemia time, Br J Plast Surg, 53, 76, 10.1054/bjps.1999.3234 · DOI · Paper page
- Manoli, 2010, One-stage ear reconstruction after avulsion injury, using the amputated cartilage and a retroauricular transposition flap, Eplasty, 10, e13
- Punjabi, 1997, Management of injuries to the auricle, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 55, 732, 10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90589-9 · DOI
- Bozkir, 2006, Morphometry of the external ear in our adult population, Aesthet Plast Surg, 30, 81, 10.1007/s00266-005-6095-1 · DOI
- Magritz, 2013, Reconstruction of the avulsed auricle after trauma, Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 46, 841, 10.1016/j.otc.2013.07.004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Auricular avulsion injuries and reattachment techniques: A systematic review
Gailey, A. D., Farquhar, D., Clark, J. M., & Shockley, W. W. (2020) · Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/lio2.372 · Cited by 32
Al-Ali, M. A., & Abu-Zidan, F. M. (2022) · Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.4103/2452-2473.342811 · Cited by 12
“Brockhoff and Zide [29] 2014 1 22 Male Human bite Lower 2/3 8 LA None Completely necrosed Necrosis”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Brockhoff, H. C., & Zide, M.
- Affiliations
- Parkland Memorial Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Brockhoff, Hans C.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1432.e1-1432.e4
- ISSN
- 0278-2391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034518347
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
- Keywords
- postauricular flap, free graft, perichondrium, ear trauma, full-thickness skin graft, microsurgical repair
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bites, Human, Ear, External, Humans, Male, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review