Cited by 14Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reconstruction of a subtotally amputated auricle: a case report

Yotsuyanagi, Ken Yamashita, Yosuke, Takatoshi·2001·Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery

Abstract

A 42-year-old woman presented with a subtotal amputation of the left auricle except for the helical skin. The treatment was by primary suture with debridement of some margins, and the auricle healed well. The fact that the treatment was successful without microvascular anastomoses is important, considering the anatomical features of the auricular vascular networks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/028443101317149408

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yotsuyanagi, K. Y.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery
Published
2001-01
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
425-428
ISSN
0284-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164965328
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
ear reconstruction, primary suture, debridement
MeSH terms
Adult, Amputation, Traumatic, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review