Cited by 73Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAcademic Writing and PublishingArtificial Intelligence in Education

The role of using ChatGPT AI in writing medical scientific articles

Benichou, L.·2023·Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical research is on the rise. This article explores the role of using ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI, in writing medical scientific articles. The material and methods used included a comparative analysis of medical scientific articles produced with and without the use of ChatGPT. The results suggest that the use of ChatGPT can be a useful tool for scientists to increase the production of higher quality medical scientific articles, but it is important to note that AI cannot fully replace human authors. In conclusion, scientists should consider ChatGPT as an additional tool to produce higher quality medical scientific articles more quickly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101456

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benichou, L.
Venue
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
124
Issue
5
Pages
101456
ISSN
2468-7855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360835341
Cited by
73
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, scientific writing, AI-assisted writing, human authorship, research productivity
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Language, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review